.
Me no understand what
Jander711 and
Petra were referring to. I guess the post or posts in question were removed.
Hey,
Sweetmullet! When I laid eyes on this photo you
put up a few pages back...
... I thought of the most "violent" rejection girl. (The one who exploded at our hero, saying that the only one she gets naughty with is her husband.) I'm sure this lady isn't her, especially since there is a name attached to the photo's link from the NVG site
("Maude"), but regardless, what I'm interested in... for some inexplicable reason... is the story behind that one who blew her top. (I see Sweetmullet has gone on to
refer to the rejection lady in connection with Maude, so maybe they are one and the same.)
And this connects with the ending question I put forth in my
last post:
"There's an implication there that these were 'real' women, and not those who were in on the gag."
Netvideogirls kindly
stated that he would respond to that post one'a these days; I hope he will (or at least this one part of the post), because I'm sure it's not just Monsieur
Markypage and I who are interested in the mechanics behind the rejection girls. When
Netvideogirls stated outright that these women rejected the infamous proposition, it didn't make any sense.
Since we have brought Sweetmullet into my invaluable monologue, I'd like to add that while I'm not trying to prove how smart I am (although I'd sincerely appreciate if you would acknowledge my genius), I wanted to tell you that as soon as I read that
Netvideogirls wrote Sweetmullet would be banned, I immediately knew
Netvideogirls was joking. (This is after
Netvideogirls had thrown me for a loop when he joked about a connection he had made between me and Kendra Cole -- and I
took him seriously. See, I have not always been as brilliant as I am now.)
I've come to realize that our hero has a wonderful and arch sense of humor which -- once I get past that vertigo moment of ... "hold on, did he really
mean that"... I greatly appreciate. Of course, there is risk for those who dare to go beyond the safe boundaries, and when the audience takes things the wrong way, it can be a tricky situation.
Netvideogirls was very sensitive with his explanation and apology, more than I would have been, which is much to his credit.
While
Will E Worm was entirely correct in writing,
"She was in porn, she's not too bright" (in regards to
Jane, whom I'd like to hear more about), I still felt an adverse reaction. I think the last thing we should do (ideally what everyone should do, especially the false moralists who condemn pornography while privately getting off on it) is to blame the participant. There is a variety of reasons why women get into porn, not all admirable, but some do so because they are free-spirited. These ladies need to be celebrated; in the cases of those who are not desperate, it takes courage to make the fateful decision, with the knowledge of the ostracization they will face by fools who take the opportunity to act superior. If anyone deserves criticism, it is our hypocritical and repressed society.
(Will E. went on to
state that those who make the free choice should not try to hide the facts and presented a link to one example - I do not blame that man for trying to cover his tracks one bit. He does not live in an environment that is forgiving, and he has his livelihood to consider. He apologized for lying, which was commendable, but he also apologized for his "bad judgment" -- as though what he did was a crime.)
==============
I liked
CompletelyAverage's
message. He's obviously not average (wish he would listen to Will E. and not try to hide the facts) and hopefully he will sound off more.
I enjoyed
Netvideogirls's "Going Back in Time "
post, lots. If I may address you directly,
Netvideogirls (did you... actually speak with
Santa? You mean Virginia was not lied to, and that there actually
is --- awww, you got me again, didn't you, you rascal? Joking again, for Pete's sake...), believing that this thread probably helped inspire you to travel down this road, it must been somewhat cathartic for you to dive into that mountain of records (used to use a Canon XL-1, I see from the
Wayback page you linked to...
sigh! But, hey, the plot you wrote for
Mandy was completely inaccurate; she wasn't rejected at all. Besides, who would reject Mandy?). As challenging as it must have been for you to begin sorting things out, what a pleasure it must have been for you as well, to sort through these reminders of your life.
Speaking of Mandy, thank you very much for renewing your promise to
Lolzpron to try and find the missing hardcore episode. I see you have chosen to remaster her two known episodes, which indicates your realization of what a special NVG lady Mandy is. See, even
LeftHanded has
joined the chorus of Mandy adorers. If you cannot find this hidden treasure, then I am sorry, you are simply going to dig her up from whatever she is doing and shoot the episode you should have shot way back when. (Let's see, assuming her age of 22 was factual from the
Wayback page, and some fifteen years have passed... why, that would put her at the height of her sexual peak.)
.