Yes.
Really? That's means I'm gonna have to work and put a list together?
Yes.
does anyone else find it hilariously ironic that Palin
1) railed Barack Obama in 2008 for not having 'executive experience' like her, because she was governor
2) and mocked Obama's credentials being a "community organizer"
lmao
1) Palin quit the very thing that was supposed to give her credibility (did not finish half her term as governor)
and
2) now spends her days as nothing more than an attention-whoring COMMUNITY ORGANIZER
lololololollollllll aaaaaahhhhhh
if only there were a thread about Republican hypocrisy
I find the entire political process in America ridiculous and absurd. The stupidity of the GOP is an insult to everyone's intelligence, but the arrogance of the incumbent's to knowingly have sold out their base of 2008 and have pretty much told those people to "Fuck off, what are your other options?" is just as disgusting. However, this race to the bottom by the GOP is what is seriously fucking this country up
:1orglaugh
You gotta get out more often.:rofl2:
What a mean spirited post.
Palin didn't do those things?
Palin didn't do those things?
I'm beginning to think there is a script somewhere...
(The thread ironically started by someone going by the name 'parrothead'...)
I think the reference was to the picture that was posted, not the Palin verbiage.
The picture is in poor taste. So, one could think of that as mean.
Others, who may have poor taste, or are mean, may just think the picture is funny.
So, you're baiting me because people notice "mean spirited" posts.
I'll take that.
So, you're baiting me because people notice "mean spirited" posts.
I'll take that.
So when I click on the "script" link I go to a post where you were commenting on someone else's dopey remarks.
When I first read monica's post I thought she was disagreeing with the stupid things Palin is doing and I didn't get it. I agree, the picture is offensive.
It is a porn site, so I wouldn't get too offended. On the other hand I wouldn't get too offended by someone saying it is a stupid post or picture.
You are being baited by the guy who posted the "script" link. Looks like he spends his life on here baiting anyone who he disagrees with him. He either works for freeones or it is a bit sad. No sense arguing since you don't seem to have a fraction of the posts he does.
go play with your extra chromosones (its porn board for christ sakes, not better homes and gardens)What a mean spirited post.
So when I click on the "script" link I go to a post where you were commenting on someone else's dopey remarks.
When I first read monica's post I thought she was disagreeing with the stupid things Palin is doing and I didn't get it. I agree, the picture is offensive.
It is a porn site, so I wouldn't get too offended. On the other hand I wouldn't get too offended by someone saying it is a stupid post or picture.
You are being baited by the guy who posted the "script" link. Looks like he spends his life on here baiting anyone who he disagrees with him. He either works for freeones or it is a bit sad. No sense arguing since you don't seem to have a fraction of the posts he does.
go play with your extra chromosones (its porn board for christ sakes, not better homes and gardens. we're posting pics of Ava Devine's prolapsed asshole and you're worried about decorum?)What a mean spirited post.
go play with your extra chromosones (its porn board for christ sakes, not better homes and gardens)
'Analyze This'
Uh...no 'teach'...the post wasn't even addressed to you.
Secondly, some people could notice it as YOU baiting by descending into a thread and creating your first post in it not addressing the topic but characterizing someone and/or their post in a derogatory fashion.
Welcome to group of people he hates.
He broke his own silly rule by addressing you when you didn't reply to him.
Congratulations. I'm not sure you if you were trying to piss him off, but you did.
Maybe you'll read it correctly this time.:dunno:
Who said it was a rule? But certainly if someone discusses me...I think it qualifies as a circumstance I'm going to reply to.
Typical, you posted only an edited portion of the message to dishonestly attempt to make a point. :nono:
You left out
"Uh...no 'teach'...the post wasn't even addressed to you."
It was read and interpreted correctly.