"Only In America"

if you think black people somehow have it easy in America, you're fucking clueless.

by black people I'm assuming you mean poor blacks. I've lived overseas and in third world countries. I've seen true poverty (including relatives) - digging through garbage heaps for food poverty.

By contrast, (and I know this is anecdotal but it's representative) here in the U.S. I've seen firsthand because I grew up with friends who were poor and yes, black and in each instance their families had:

1) A roof over their head
2) A fridge full of food
3) A car in the garage
4) A big screen tv
5) A video game console
6) Enough money to get keyed (high/*****) on a regular basis

This while both spouses didn't work and with multiple ******** in the household. So in comparison to poor people around the world, the poor in the U.S. have it damn good.

Oh, and poor people in the U.S. have a problem with OBESITY.
 
3) Only in America, could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
Present french budget minister Jerome Cahuzac is being tax-probed about a swiss-account he may have had 'til 2010
Premium Link Upgrade
 
Yup. That's it. Wasn't born in NYC or anything. Didn't grow up in one of the worst neighborhoods on Staten island. you know me so well.

"2) Only in America, could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black. "

This implies that someone the African American community no longer gets discriminated against by the Government and that by having a back President suddenly eveyrthing is a-fucking-okay for them, when that just isn't true. I've seen it my entire life.

No, you don't live here and know what's really going on. You only get what you see and hear on the news, which is only what they want you to see and hear. Yes, things are bad in black neighborhoods (in relation to other areas in the country, but a damn sight better than in Africa, like where the ******* of a certain somebody who thinks we're all our *******'s keeper but not when it comes to his own ******* who lives in a hut on like $20 a year, while this certain somebody runs a freaking country and is worth millions), but because of politicians who want to keep them there, so the politicians can promise them things, and then stay in office. The politicians want them to be poor, the politicians tell them that they can't succeed, "it's all because of people who have what you don't, and if you'll vote for me, I'll take it from them and give it to you, so you'll keep me in power, and keep you right where you are with just enough handouts to make you think I'm fighting for you."

And I don't know if you've noticed, but um, the cities and places with all the bad areas, you know, where the blacks live, they're run by Democrats. The very people who say they're trying to help blacks, but are really just keeping them trapped and enslaved for votes.

The government hasn't discriminated against blacks or any minority in years, and when there is discrimination, it's by people on the left, who supposedly are for the minorities. You've got a better shot at getting into just about anything as a black than as a white, just because it's so easy for a black person to cry discrimination regardless of it being true or not and there are racial quotas for some things, which means discrimination in favor of minorities. And either way you cut it, discrimination is wrong. It's supposed to be the content of your character, not the color of your skin. And if you'll listen to politicians, it's interesting who's seeing colors, genders, sexuality, and everything else, and who's seeing Americans, because by the way things get reported, you'd swear it'd be the other way around. Just like supposedly the right is violent, yet it's the left that time after time is violent.

Oh, and to make sure all of us Americans and Europeans are on the same page here, right and left mean different things to us. See, here in America, we actually have 2 schools of thought: big, controlling government (socialism/communism, fascism, the US left), and as small a government as possible where the people are free to do what they want (libertarianism, the US right). In Europe, you guys just have the big, controlling government in 2 forms, communism left, and national socialism right, AKA the Nazis. So let's not be confusing who's what, shall we?

You know something I really don't understand (well, I do, but for rhetorical purposes) is why is it that the people on the left are in such good standing with blacks and other minorities, when they're the ones who have run the government at all levels that did all the bad things to blacks (and still do) and are the ones who have made efforts to exterminate the blacks with Planned Parenthood, yet the people on the right who freed them and gave them rights, don't want them ******* their babies, and want them to be successful are somehow the bad guys?
 
No, you don't live here and know what's really going on. You only get what you see and hear on the news, which is only what they want you to see and hear. Yes, things are bad in black neighborhoods (in relation to other areas in the country, but a damn sight better than in Africa, like where the ******* of a certain somebody who thinks we're all our *******'s keeper but not when it comes to his own ******* who lives in a hut on like $20 a year, while this certain somebody runs a freaking country and is worth millions), but because of politicians who want to keep them there, so the politicians can promise them things, and then stay in office. The politicians want them to be poor, the politicians tell them that they can't succeed, "it's all because of people who have what you don't, and if you'll vote for me, I'll take it from them and give it to you, so you'll keep me in power, and keep you right where you are with just enough handouts to make you think I'm fighting for you."

And I don't know if you've noticed, but um, the cities and places with all the bad areas, you know, where the blacks live, they're run by Democrats. The very people who say they're trying to help blacks, but are really just keeping them trapped and enslaved for votes.

The government hasn't discriminated against blacks or any minority in years, and when there is discrimination, it's by people on the left, who supposedly are for the minorities. You've got a better shot at getting into just about anything as a black than as a white, just because it's so easy for a black person to cry discrimination regardless of it being true or not and there are racial quotas for some things, which means discrimination in favor of minorities. And either way you cut it, discrimination is wrong. It's supposed to be the content of your character, not the color of your skin. And if you'll listen to politicians, it's interesting who's seeing colors, genders, sexuality, and everything else, and who's seeing Americans, because by the way things get reported, you'd swear it'd be the other way around. Just like supposedly the right is violent, yet it's the left that time after time is violent.

Oh, and to make sure all of us Americans and Europeans are on the same page here, right and left mean different things to us. See, here in America, we actually have 2 schools of thought: big, controlling government (socialism/communism, fascism, the US left), and as small a government as possible where the people are free to do what they want (libertarianism, the US right). In Europe, you guys just have the big, controlling government in 2 forms, communism left, and national socialism right, AKA the Nazis. So let's not be confusing who's what, shall we?

You know something I really don't understand (well, I do, but for rhetorical purposes) is why is it that the people on the left are in such good standing with blacks and other minorities, when they're the ones who have run the government at all levels that did all the bad things to blacks (and still do) and are the ones who have made efforts to exterminate the blacks with Planned Parenthood, yet the people on the right who freed them and gave them rights, don't want them ******* their babies, and want them to be successful are somehow the bad guys?
You need to stop talking down to me, right the fuck now. i lived there for 20 years. Our media is nothing like yours. There is no seeing what "they" want me to see, because there is no "they". The more you type this nonsense the more apparent it become that YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU'RE EVEN TALKING ABOUT.
 
No one alive is leaving Finland to find "freedom". You've no idea what you're talking about. We're not some ex-soviet state. We beat Russia twice, actually. Our education and health systems are better, and in a lot of ways we're a lot more free than the US, mostly because there's a lot less judgement and religious fanaticism. But hey, you can go ahead and make even more assumptions. I actually had a thread in Politics about how ridiculous it is when Americans try to tell me how not free we are.

Well, there's some more of that 'education,' saying we judge people and have religious fanaticism (there are kooks, but there are kooks in everything, and you can't lump 99.999% in with the .001%, and by the way, apparently we're free enough to have 'religious fanaticism'), and apparently you don't know your country's history, because, yeah, people did leave your country and a whole bunch of others, risking their lives to come to the US.

So, how is your health system better? I haven't heard of any new medical breakthroughs coming out of Finland.
 
No, you don't live here and know what's really going on. You only get what you see and hear on the news, which is only what they want you to see and hear. Yes, things are bad in black neighborhoods (in relation to other areas in the country, but a damn sight better than in Africa, like where the ******* of a certain somebody who thinks we're all our *******'s keeper but not when it comes to his own ******* who lives in a hut on like $20 a year, while this certain somebody runs a freaking country and is worth millions), but because of politicians who want to keep them there, so the politicians can promise them things, and then stay in office. The politicians want them to be poor, the politicians tell them that they can't succeed, "it's all because of people who have what you don't, and if you'll vote for me, I'll take it from them and give it to you, so you'll keep me in power, and keep you right where you are with just enough handouts to make you think I'm fighting for you."

And I don't know if you've noticed, but um, the cities and places with all the bad areas, you know, where the blacks live, they're run by Democrats. The very people who say they're trying to help blacks, but are really just keeping them trapped and enslaved for votes.

The government hasn't discriminated against blacks or any minority in years, and when there is discrimination, it's by people on the left, who supposedly are for the minorities. You've got a better shot at getting into just about anything as a black than as a white, just because it's so easy for a black person to cry discrimination regardless of it being true or not and there are racial quotas for some things, which means discrimination in favor of minorities. And either way you cut it, discrimination is wrong. It's supposed to be the content of your character, not the color of your skin. And if you'll listen to politicians, it's interesting who's seeing colors, genders, sexuality, and everything else, and who's seeing Americans, because by the way things get reported, you'd swear it'd be the other way around. Just like supposedly the right is violent, yet it's the left that time after time is violent.

Oh, and to make sure all of us Americans and Europeans are on the same page here, right and left mean different things to us. See, here in America, we actually have 2 schools of thought: big, controlling government (socialism/communism, fascism, the US left), and as small a government as possible where the people are free to do what they want (libertarianism, the US right). In Europe, you guys just have the big, controlling government in 2 forms, communism left, and national socialism right, AKA the Nazis. So let's not be confusing who's what, shall we?

You know something I really don't understand (well, I do, but for rhetorical purposes) is why is it that the people on the left are in such good standing with blacks and other minorities, when they're the ones who have run the government at all levels that did all the bad things to blacks (and still do) and are the ones who have made efforts to exterminate the blacks with Planned Parenthood, yet the people on the right who freed them and gave them rights, don't want them ******* their babies, and want them to be successful are somehow the bad guys?

Biggest load of **** I have ever read on this forum, tell me, have you lived in Europe to be able to make these assumptions?

Also, 'Only in America' would people think that the things in that list are exclusive to them.
 
There are some very forward thinking European & South American countries, I only hope that Australia will take heed from these countries. Strangely enough the US assisted with some of the European countries constitutions after WWII & they were way ahead of their time ... (???) But I do like Obama's capping of senior executive salaries - its about fucking time! :2 cents:

By 'forward thinking' I assume you mean 'Progressive' (the ones who wanna do some truly despicable things, not far off from **** Germany), and by 'ahead of their time,' you mean basically setting things up the way they had been, but instead of a king or queen, you must be in the political ruling party instead?

So, you like that that guy capped salaries? Hmm. I don't suppose you happen to, you know, run a business or something do you? 'Cause, you know, that would mean, your income would be capped. So, do you support capping how much you make? Because it's a slippery slope that'll trickle it's way down to you.

Unlike some people, I don't care how much people make nor how they spend it, and it's amazing how many people wanna tell other people how much is enough or what a proper way to spend their money is, but when dealing with their own money, wanna be left the hell alone.




As a side note here, you know the main reason I don't like discussing politics on here, aside from it being a porn site and like completely the wrong forum for such discussions? It's not people on the left who don't have a leg to stand on with their policies (though, that can be annoying at times the way they'll try to fight their battle), it's arguing things about the US and US politics with Europeans and Aussies.
 
This guy's posts have made me take a double shot of my strongest Russian *****. please, everyone, disregard everything he says. he has no idea what he's talking about. Basically all of Europe is free, with places like Belarus and the like being debatable. either way, comparing Finland to **** Germany is just plain insebsitive and rude. Goodnight.
 
But I do like Obama's capping of senior executive salaries - its about fucking time! :2 cents:

How exactly does that help anyone? Making a rich person less rich doesn't make a poor person less poor.

A CEO's salary is generally decided by a board of directors responsible to the shareholders. If they feel he is worth the money who is a bureaucrat who is paid by tax payers to say otherwise?
 
You need to stop talking down to me, right the fuck now. i lived there for 20 years. Our media is nothing like yours. There is no seeing what "they" want me to see, because there is no "they". The more you type this nonsense the more apparent it become that YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU'RE EVEN TALKING ABOUT.

I love it when I get cussed at, yelled at, and told to shut up in political discussions :) Shows how well things are going for me :) You're pissed off, and I'm not.

So, you lived here for 20 years, huh? (Which 20 and while how old?) And you say the media in Finland is nothing like that over here? Really? You don't have a media controlled almost exclusively by the left that selectively edits things and will cover things that fit the narrative or advance their chosen policies, but will turn a blind eye to the people on their side and inconvenient facts that don't help their cause? Right :sarcasm:


Of course you're seeing what 'they' want, because you weren't there and you have no idea what happened until 'they' 'tell' you. And if all the media outlets agree, well, it must be true, right? I mean, how would you know? You weren't there. The media knows you can't be everywhere, so they use their power of giving you the 'news' to help their friends with political power. Even if they have the very best intentions, you're still only gonna see what they want you to see. A perfect example of that is when there was a car chase over here, and FNC failed to cut away or go on delay to cover up and not show that the fugitive shot himself :suicide: They apologized for showing us what had actually happened (though you couldn't tell more than he put his hand to his head and then fell to the ground) and to never let it happen again. I'm sorry, but as a reporter and news source, it is you're job to report the news uncensored in any way. If Fox was so sorry about showing something that actually happened and promised to never let it happen again, it makes you wonder what else are they're keeping from you for whatever reason :suspicious:
 
^ yet again more bollocks, what the fuck are you talking about? Maybe the apologised for showing someone ******* themselves on live TV because it just might be a bit upsetting for some people, I'm thinking young **** here, to see something like that out of the blue. And if you think that Fox New is left leaning then you really are clueless.

Also I love the irony about how you claim to get annoyed when someone from Europe or Australia tries to talk about American politics, but you are quite happy to spout your completely wrong views on European politics. I ask again, have you ever lived in Europe? or even been?

I would suggest that you stop reading Chomsky but I find it hard to believe that you would have the capacity to understand him.
 
I would suggest that you stop reading Chomsky but I find it hard to believe that you would have the capacity to understand him.

Inasmuch as you can understand the musings of a lunatic.

At the news that Bin Laden was ****** and Americans celebrating:

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden’s. . . - Noam Chomsky
 
Biggest load of **** I have ever read on this forum, tell me, have you lived in Europe to be able to make these assumptions?

Also, 'Only in America' would people think that the things in that list are exclusive to them.

So, what assumptions have I made, hmm? Because there's no assumptions in what you quoted from me, thus making an already irrelevant point about where I may have lived even more irrelevant. And I guess by saying what I was quoted as having said is such a load of excrement, you must think the exact opposite of everything I said, huh? So, by that logic, you must believe:

The news is the God's honest truth.
Black neighborhoods are actually better off than the rest of the country.
Africa is better than the US.
That guy isn't a hypocrite.
Politicians don't buy votes with handouts.
Cities and urban areas aren't run by leftists who are lying to blacks.
The government does still discriminate.
Blacks don't unfairly cry discrimination.
There are no racial quotas.
Discrimination is correct.
It is the color of your skin and not the content of your character that maters.
Democrats don't see in colors, sexes, sexuality, classes, etc.
Conservatives don't see Americans.
The right is violent but the left isn't.
There either are no differences between the US and European political spectrums, or they're reversed if there is a difference.
And the Democrats are the ones who freed the slaves and gave them rights, don't want them ******* their babies, haven't tried to exterminate them with Planned Parenthood, didn't run the south or any level of government that mistreated blacks, etc, and are the bad guys, and those on the right did do all those things and are in good standing with blacks.
 
Yes because when someone dares to disagree with you then that automatically means that they think the exact opposite to you, because there is no middle ground. You have got me figured out, god you're god. Fucking tit.

And you still havent answered my question.

You made a (false) statement about European politics, I asked you a simple question if you have ever lived in Europe to become so well informed. And seeing as you tried (and failed) to shoot someone down who talked about US politics by asking them if they had ever lived in America and claimed that they couldnt possibly know the truth as they didnt live in America it seems only fair to ask you the same if you are going to pass on opinions about European politics.
 
if you think black people somehow have it easy in America, you're fucking clueless.
Why don't you shut the fuck up! You don't live here and I don't live there! I don't talk **** about your country so keep your mouth shut about mine! I fought for MY country and I will not respect you for your opinion of mine! I've read your posts here and I don't give a fuck if you lived here or not, you don't talk **** about my country!
 
By 'forward thinking' I assume you mean 'Progressive' (the ones who wanna do some truly despicable things, not far off from **** Germany), and by 'ahead of their time,' you mean basically setting things up the way they had been, but instead of a king or queen, you must be in the political ruling party instead?

So, you like that that guy capped salaries? Hmm. I don't suppose you happen to, you know, run a business or something do you? 'Cause, you know, that would mean, your income would be capped. So, do you support capping how much you make? Because it's a slippery slope that'll trickle it's way down to you.

Unlike some people, I don't care how much people make nor how they spend it, and it's amazing how many people wanna tell other people how much is enough or what a proper way to spend their money is, but when dealing with their own money, wanna be left the hell alone.




As a side note here, you know the main reason I don't like discussing politics on here, aside from it being a porn site and like completely the wrong forum for such discussions? It's not people on the left who don't have a leg to stand on with their policies (though, that can be annoying at times the way they'll try to fight their battle), it's arguing things about the US and US politics with Europeans and Aussies.

By forward thinking I meant 'forward thinking' as in health care for all... oh sorry that's right we have all had that for years but the US is only just starting to get it together....

Capped salaries on CEO's - luv it! No one should be paid millions of fucking dollars to do quite frankly - fuck all. I say that because it's the people under them that do all the work they just say the yay or nay & occasionally cop the brunt if their people fuck it up. You may not care how much money people make & that is your 'prerogative' but my personal opinion is that the division between poverty & the wealthiest needs to decreased. I don't like the term plutonomy or peasants but if your more than happy with that then so be it - even fuckwits should be allowed to make choices, I'm not going to discriminate.

If you don't wish to discuss US politics with Aussies or Europeans on porn sites (or any sites...) then don't ~ me personally I enjoy conversing with dickheads as I find it extremely amusing!!!
:sarcasm::dickhead:
 
How exactly does that help anyone? Making a rich person less rich doesn't make a poor person less poor.

A CEO's salary is generally decided by a board of directors responsible to the shareholders. If they feel he is worth the money who is a bureaucrat who is paid by tax payers to say otherwise?

No I suppose your right... if the rich were paid less & the poor were paid more how could that possibly help anyone??? :dunno: :bang:
 
No I suppose your right... if the rich were paid less & the poor were paid more how could that possibly help anyone??? :dunno: :bang:

That's what I'm getting at. Putting a cap on some executive's pay doesn't result in some poor person getting paid more. This isn't a zero sum game.
You know what it does result in? That poor person going "Haha, that CEO got screwed! Now back to my 40." And if CEO's didn't do but "fuck all" they wouldn't be paid millions by the SHAREHOLDERS who's money is at stake.
 
Back
Top