Obama's approval rate drops......

We need less religion not more.
Your god is dead.
Get over it!

How can they call themselves the Constitution party when almost everything they stand for is unconstitutional?

:rolleyes:

:nono: I hear Canada or Mexico would take you and anyone else who doesn't like it.

Real CHANGE you can believe in! :D
 
Sanctity of Life: The pre-born *****, whose life begins at fertilization, is a human being created in God's image. The first duty of the law is to prevent the shedding of innocent *****. It is, therefore, the duty of all civil governments to secure and to safeguard the lives of the pre-born.
Actually, it should be unborn. But, the thing is no more abortion.

I've always wondered about advocates of this. How do you account for chimera's?

Is the individual born with two souls trapped within one body, or what?
:1orglaugh
 
First it would be putting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights back in full power.

The Federal Reserve would go and we would go back to Constitutional money. Gold and silver and gold and silver back currency.

The states would have their rights and no one could step in and try to change their laws.

There would be tighter immigration laws and the borders would be protected.

No, more 501c3 churches. There aren't supposed to be any laws for churches.

Sanctity of Life: The pre-born *****, whose life begins at fertilization, is a human being created in God's image. The first duty of the law is to prevent the shedding of innocent *****. It is, therefore, the duty of all civil governments to secure and to safeguard the lives of the pre-born.
Actually, it should be unborn. But, the thing is no more abortion.

No, more mandatory insurance for vehicles. The police would handle accident reports.

Unjust taxes would be repealed.

No, more unjust and unfounded wars.

Many things.

No offence, but that just sounds unrealistic, what would the shamed teenager that got pregnant be treated like? what would the illegitimate ***** be treated like?

I'm not down with cussing religeon, or religeous people. I'm equally entitled to believe what I like as you are to do the same. I just think that all those constition things were written in different times. What was the situation back then with women being allowed to vote? I'm not big on history, but it was only fourty or fifty years ago that black people got rights? I might be wrong in saying this, but I think laws have to reflect the society that they're written for!
 
Quick question...may require a little research.....but sir, Obama has inherited the worst presidency since the depression era...
It doesn't really matter, he has an endless supply of monies available to fix his "worst inherited presidency", however, his policies aren't indicative of having anything to do with recovery at all, they're just increasing the size of the moochy parasitic fed govt. being that they're hiring as many as 10,000 new lifetime employees per month under this pos pres.
The nerve of these louts! :hammer:

What's going to happen is, we're gonna end up with an all the more outrageously inflated dollar, a record high and growing unemployment rate, an economy that isn't showing any signs of recovery, a multi trillion dollar debt, an obama administration flying off toward the Caribbean in all of their gulfstream jets and a PRC who holds the keys to the whitehouse.


. :hammer:
"O"
 
Of course his approval ratings are dropping. It's just sad that it took this long for so many people to realize this guy has no qualified experience to run anything and is nothing more than a glorified community organizer!
 
Obama no matter if he fucks up or if he kisses the arab nations asses, it is you with the support of fk and your leftist pinko commie backup fridayonmymind.

:rofl:
I haven't called you an ignorant racist frog lately ,so lighten up.:thefinger
I don't believe that Obama is a born and bread American since the very begining.

Let me help you with your english grammar here,this should read as follows

I didn't beleive that Obama is a born and bred American since the very beginning.


And you should keep in mind that my opinion of Obama counts just a little more than yours since I am an actual "born and bred" american like Obama.
I'm sure we could write on the head of a pin what I know about france as compared to you,and the case is even more so when we compare our knowledge of the USA between us.



As to this issue of Obama's approval rating it really says more about the american people then it does Obama.We live in a society who expects politicians to be santa claus and to provide instant painless solutions.
The only important approval rating Obama has to worry about will be the one he gets in 2012.And then it will again be a choice between him and some other real person (not santa btw).The republicans have to come up with someone better then anyone on the horizon now to really threaten Obama IMO.
 
Did people really think that they were going to say high all 4 years? People on the left are pissed becasue he is not left enough, people to the right are pissed casue well he is on the left and people in the middle are pissed casue they can't make up their damn minds what they are.
 
In the stark reality it sort of takes allot to tear down a popular guy's poll numbers and very little to skyrocket them...

When there is nothing to blame a President for, polls merely reflect to the mood of the country for the most part.

Fact is, the economy was going from bad to worse when Obama took office and the actions taken then averted a disaster. Why should Americans be excited about having averted a disaster?? Relief and/or guarded optimism maybe but probably not excitement.

So we're "muddling through" some tough times, nothing dramatic has happened and we're taking casualties in a war for a cause that is all but forgotten by some of the same people who claimed "to never forget".:******:

Casualties should be expected to increase when you leave bases and go into places that were virtually abandoned to the enemy.

Add that to the fact that many people seem to want to make up their own truth about his stated positions out of sheer ignorance and/or intellectual dishonesty on both sides and its a wonder how his poll are still even this high.

None of this stuff is rocket science.:*****:
 
  • Like
Reactions: on
so obama averted disaster?
how?
with the stimulus spending?
man that was just redistribution of money man, half of it being ****** on the distribution processs itself.
it didnt do ****.
if you wanted to really see some stimulus they couldve just gave a trillion dollar tax break to the people who earned it, then you would have seen some stimulation.
All that he did was put us more in the hole and give other peoples money to his core voters.

but with your point its hard to lose because we dont have a crystal ball. just like bush and the repubs and dems who chose to take out saddam may have averted disaster, or that magic rock i keep in my pocket that keeps tigers away from me.
 
so obama averted disaster?
how?
with the stimulus spending?
man that was just redistribution of money man, half of it being ****** on the distribution processs itself.
it didnt do ****.
if you wanted to really see some stimulus they couldve just gave a trillion dollar tax break to the people who earned it, then you would have seen some stimulation.
All that he did was put us more in the hole and give other peoples money to his core voters.

but with your point its hard to lose because we dont have a crystal ball. just like bush and the repubs and dems who chose to take out saddam may have averted disaster, or that magic rock i keep in my pocket that keeps tigers away from me.

Well duh, the banks could be bankrupt now and not repaying TARP right....GM, Chrysler could not exist anymore....and the stock market could have crashed instead of being back over 10K...

How about that "Meester....."??

Read what the stimulus actually went for then get back to us...:thumbsup:
 
Well duh, the banks could be bankrupt now and not repaying TARP right....GM, Chrysler could not exist anymore....and the stock market could have crashed instead of being back over 10K...

How about that "Meester....."??

Read what the stimulus actually went for then get back to us...:thumbsup:

All of that MAY be true... but here's what we know: the US debt is almost $12 Trillion and the interest payment is now bigger than the DoD annual budget.

Congress just increased the debt ceiling against yesterday, while promising over $100 Billion for "poor nations" and "global warming".

The dollar continues to weaken as a result of the debt.

And what does the President and Congress want to do to combat a problem so large that it threatens to tank the entire country? Spend even more money on health care "reform" (which it's not). Brilliant. I know when I'm broke, I like to go out and charge luxury items on my credit cards because it really helps my financial situation in the long run. :cool:
 
All of that MAY be true... but here's what we know: the US debt is almost $12 Trillion and the interest payment is now bigger than the DoD annual budget.

Congress just increased the debt ceiling against yesterday, while promising over $100 Billion for "poor nations" and "global warming".

The dollar continues to weaken as a result of the debt.

And what does the President and Congress want to do to combat a problem so large that it threatens to tank the entire country? Spend even more money on health care "reform" (which it's not). Brilliant. I know when I'm broke, I like to go out and charge luxury items on my credit cards because it really helps my financial situation in the long run. :cool:

Indeed. Never lose sight of the fact that politics is only the art of the possible. The president is just one man and his administration is only one part of the puzzle. The vast majority of the "puzzle" being beyond both his control and remit. Long term difficult decisions that would benefit the nation as a whole have to be balanced against a short term electoral reality. Good luck to any party running on an austerity policy designed to bear fruit over a generation. Or two. (The idiotic health policy of spending thousands of dollars an hour to keep a bed ridden geriatric alive was mentioned recently. Every single doctor on the planet knows that this obsession with using all available medical technology on people whose time has come is a seriously dumb allocation of resources - yet how was the debate framed for consumption. "**** death panels." )

I would remind posters on here that the changing fortunes of the Post WWII US economy are more a reflection of other nations getting stronger in their own right then a failure to enact the right domestic policies, although this is not to imply mistakes have not been made. This process will continue regardless of decisions made in Washington by parties of whatever stripe. (The repercussions for the US and the world resulting from this change would be the subject for another thread.)

Currently in Copenhagen we can see the painfully slow process of attempting to satisfy noble long term goals across many political fault lines. It is sausage making of the first stripe. Personally I am pleased that BO is the US representative in this endeavour. He is the most pragmatic and thoughtful president of recent memory and has so far by some distance delivered the best speeches in which US policy has reflected the actual reality of the world as it currently stands and the direction it is taking. Speeches alone do not make a presidency but they do set the tone and shape the agenda. If a drop in popularity some distance from the next election is the price to pay for this then I would say it is good politics. Walking away from Copenhagen a la Kyoto is no longer an option for the US. A failure to engage in this process will diminish american standing. There is a future payoff for the nations that are at the forefront of green technology, an inability to compete in this arena will leave sections of the US economy trying to sell the equivalent of the SUV to a world wanting to buy a prius.

Lastly, can people stop going on about this straw man that confused Jesus for Obama? It doesn't mesh with the many polls that show how little citizens distrust politicians.
 
Congress just increased the debt ceiling against yesterday, while promising over $100 Billion for "poor nations" and "global warming".

Bolded item is a scam IMO
 
All this bitching and moaning about Obama annoys the **** out of me. He can't kiss it and make it all better. For God's sake the guy hasn't even been in office for a year. Apparently everyone thought that he could fix everything over night. The worst economic slump we have had in years,unemployment, healthcare, 2 wars, patching up international relations...trying to clean up the previous adminstration's mess. Sorry, but I don't give a **** who you are that's expecting too much. Georgie *** had 8 years to put everything into a talespin and fuck everything up. Or would everyone prefer to have King George and his court of jesters back? :mad: :dunno:
 
All of that MAY be true... but here's what we know: the US debt is almost $12 Trillion and the interest payment is now bigger than the DoD annual budget.

Congress just increased the debt ceiling against yesterday, while promising over $100 Billion for "poor nations" and "global warming".

The dollar continues to weaken as a result of the debt.

And what does the President and Congress want to do to combat a problem so large that it threatens to tank the entire country? Spend even more money on health care "reform" (which it's not). Brilliant. I know when I'm broke, I like to go out and charge luxury items on my credit cards because it really helps my financial situation in the long run. :cool:

Sighhhh.....

Course 101: Debt, Indebtedness, Borrowing, Broke and Bankruptcy:2 cents:

Briefly though, borrowing and debt aren't inherently bad. For example, lending institutions were "broke" verging on bankruptcy and they borrowed money....now most returned to solvency and are repaying what they borrowed.

Borrowing for some expense doesn't mean you're broke or bankrupt as some of you seem to think...broke and bankrupt have to do with your ability to afford your expenses and repay your debt.

Not to confuse debt with expenses....those are two different things..

Some think it's a natural reality that if you borrow for some thing that by definition means you can't afford it. That's not altogether true...

Somethings not only require the capital of others but in some cases it would be dumb not to borrow for them.

You are borrowing too much when you can not or foreseeably can't afford the expense of repayment.

But you don't consider yourself broke or bankrupt just because you've borrowed to buy a home or car.:2 cents:
 
This new year will only get better once Obama buys this unicorn! :hatsoff:

Premium Link Upgrade

Somebody out there really, really loves Obama to have painted this! :1orglaugh
 
Back
Top