*GASP*
...And that would be bad, why?
Her site is generally lame and only occasionally exciting. I am a fan of her body not her concept.
She hides behind the"tease" label like a bureaucratic shield. As though the site has a tacit disclaimer stating, "Warning: 'Tease' material herein. Site content may be frustrating and/or disappointing to viewers who dislike getting kicked in the junk." (NOTE: I didn't say you liked to have your testes stepped on, I just stated what the attitude rubs off as.)
"Teasing" in the context of sex is generally a prelude to a more satisfying, consummate experience. The whole point of a tease routine (in the grand old tradition of say, Gypsy Rose Lee) is to delay gratification; it isn't to withhold it. Sex denial is a different type of fetish more of the femdom variety.
I don't believe Nikki is a kinky femdom-type; if anything she's a bit of a sexual sub. However, where she's entirely Dominant is the money department. She's just about cash. Giving as little as possible to get the most out of the mark. And this is what I don't like about her: disproportionate quid pro quo. She's cheap with her product and transparently so. This, in turn, makes her comes off a bit hard and a bit mean.
*Cue: White Knight cavalry.![]()
So you tried to sound smart, but only continued to show an inability to debate against the fact that she advertises as a tease, members pay for a tease, and therefore they get a tease.
Holy shit! She works a job for money? Since when did people start doing that!??!?! Where was this revelation before I spent my own money on anything!??!?!
She is edging material. Your definition of "tease" is just that: YOUR definition of tease. She's not denying anyone sex, because she doesn't promise anyone sex. She's teasing with her body. She's showing people almost everything they want to see, gives them a little peek of it all every once in a while, and keeps people coming back. It's not about sex, it's about her body.
She's teasing. Just because you want her to do more doesn't mean she's owes you anything. If she were cheap with her product, people just stop paying for it. If people felt they were getting ripped off, they stop buying. If she came off as mean, hundreds of thousands of people wouldn't be so damned fond of her.
Your opinion is in the slim, SLIM minority, and based on...well...nothing but nonsense. You try to cover it with a vocabulary that isn't your own to come off as intelligent, when really your argument is invalid. She says she's a tease, she teases people with her body, and leaves it at that. Like a dancer at a juice bar. Look, but don't touch. Believe it or not, Nikki is far cheaper than one of those...
So take your whining and leave, and let the people here to enjoy, enjoy. If you're going to pull a, "I can be here if I want," or, "opinions...blah blah...freedom of speech..." then apply the same consideration to others who don't share your (wrong) viewpoint.