I would guess that the membership is a lot lower (less than 500) - I read somewhere that her best year with Phil Flash netted her about 200K (I imagine Phil probably pulled 100k off of her). But she and Mumbles aren't hurting for cash. They've got their affiliates and cash for clicks plus they own several rental properties and a bar. I'm sure they've got a bunch of passive income through investments as well. In assets alone they've got be worth at least 5 million. A conservative estimate: they're probably pulling in 150K off the site, another 60K off affiliates, 60K off their rentals, 300K off the bar, 150K off of other ventures and 30k off of investments. Say $750K/annum. Living in rural Illinois, $750k is plenty. Could it be more than that? Absolutely, it could be double, but I doubt that it would be much beyond that.
Nikki Sims / Next Door Nikki / Nikki's Playmates
- Thread starter glk35
- Start date
I would guess that the membership is a lot lower (less than 500) - I read somewhere that her best year with Phil Flash netted her about 200K (I imagine Phil probably pulled 100k off of her). But she and Mumbles aren't hurting for cash. They've got their affiliates and cash for clicks plus they own several rental properties and a bar. I'm sure they've got a bunch of passive income through investments as well. In assets alone they've got be worth at least 5 million. A conservative estimate: they're probably pulling in 150K off the site, another 60K off affiliates, 60K off their rentals, 300K off the bar, 150K off of other ventures and 30k off of investments. Say $750K/annum. Living in rural Illinois, $750k is plenty. Could it be more than that? Absolutely, it could be double, but I doubt that it would be much beyond that.
whatever the income, she and her dude have it dialed in regardless of her going full nude or not. Bottom line - they run a business of her teasing and bringing in the other girls to show the goods. I can't **** on that.
You know, you bring up a good point....The "other girls" I did not take that into consideration. They of course get their cut too. But of course I agree they are still laughing all the way to a bank.
Quote Originally Posted by BriX View Post
I would guess that the membership is a lot lower (less than 500) - I read somewhere that her best year with Phil Flash netted her about 200K (I imagine Phil probably pulled 100k off of her). But she and Mumbles aren't hurting for cash. They've got their affiliates and cash for clicks plus they own several rental properties and a bar. I'm sure they've got a bunch of passive income through investments as well. In assets alone they've got be worth at least 5 million. A conservative estimate: they're probably pulling in 150K off the site, another 60K off affiliates, 60K off their rentals, 300K off the bar, 150K off of other ventures and 30k off of investments. Say $750K/annum. Living in rural Illinois, $750k is plenty. Could it be more than that? Absolutely, it could be double, but I doubt that it would be much beyond that.
I would bet that almost all of those numbers are way too high. I'm in the real estate rental business, as well as the hospitality business, and $60K is a lot to expect from a few rental properties, and most bars barely make money (most make none). I seriously doubt they're in $750k territory.
I would guess that the membership is a lot lower (less than 500) - I read somewhere that her best year with Phil Flash netted her about 200K (I imagine Phil probably pulled 100k off of her). But she and Mumbles aren't hurting for cash. They've got their affiliates and cash for clicks plus they own several rental properties and a bar. I'm sure they've got a bunch of passive income through investments as well. In assets alone they've got be worth at least 5 million. A conservative estimate: they're probably pulling in 150K off the site, another 60K off affiliates, 60K off their rentals, 300K off the bar, 150K off of other ventures and 30k off of investments. Say $750K/annum. Living in rural Illinois, $750k is plenty. Could it be more than that? Absolutely, it could be double, but I doubt that it would be much beyond that.
I would bet that almost all of those numbers are way too high. I'm in the real estate rental business, as well as the hospitality business, and $60K is a lot to expect from a few rental properties, and most bars barely make money (most make none). I seriously doubt they're in $750k territory.
60K might be a bit high on the rentals (they have about 5 that I'm aware of). They're all larger homes - $1K/m*5 houses*12months = $60K?. I stand by the 300k on the bar (might pull it back to 200-250 depeneding on the clientele). Their bar is in a pseudo-rural/suburban area and is basically the only show in town; it's pub/sports bar by day, nightclub(esque) by night. A friend of mine runs the same sort of setup and nets 300K and his place is a dive in a blue-collar neighbourhood.
It's really hard to clear $1k per month on rental houses, unless they paid cash for them, but I'll stay a doubter on that.
Again, industry trends are that most bars fail in their first couple of years, very few last more than that...most that do are backed by corporations.
Good for her if they actually did invest it well.
But back to my other question...are any of you still paying for her site? I can't imagine doing so any more.
Again, industry trends are that most bars fail in their first couple of years, very few last more than that...most that do are backed by corporations.
Good for her if they actually did invest it well.
But back to my other question...are any of you still paying for her site? I can't imagine doing so any more.
