As much as it pains me to say so, I have to agree. It has been nearly 50 years since blacks(and all minorities for that matter) have actually been guaranteed the equal rights promised by the constitution. In that 50 year time span, we have seen more blacks graduating from high school, college, earning more advanced degrees and entering higher paying jobs than anytime in history. That information is a bit subjective since they weren't really allowed to do those things up until a few decades ago.
[ . .Black boys, in particular, are an especially endangered species in schools.
In Oakland, 54 percent of black boys quit school before graduation.
Meh he had issues like every one else.
At least he did what Johnson didn't..........make the North Vietnamese come to the peace table.
This is a good point. It's all to easy to ignore the good stuff when confronted by the tidal wave of insanity that was Milhouse ......
He was corrupt and very paranoid to the point of being mentally unstable so does adding bigoted to that list really surprise anybody about Nixon?
I do find it somewhat amusing and ironic about the whole 500 years for blacks stuff he mentioned considering who holds his former position right now with it being only about 40 years after he said that.
Well, at least the Daily Mail's relevant. I'll give er' that.
I mean, Nixon yeah . . . he was a bit of a shit wasn't he? Shame he's dead and all, we really could have thrown this 37 year old piece of complete and utter irrelevance right back in his fucking face now couldn't we....
*High 5*
![]()
There are racist/prejudiced/delusional people in world....big surprise! Lets move on before this turns into a thread pornstars who don't do interracial.:yinyang:
I guess we're supposed to be pissed off that he said it, right? :dunno:
Because it looks like he hit the nail on the head. Just sayin'...
Excelsior!
Nixon even called Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau a "fucking french asshole".
At least he did what Johnson didn't..........make the North Vietnamese come to the peace table.
yes but.....how much earlier could he have gotten that done if he wasn't obsessed with being the first president to lose a war?
As it was he ran (with transparent opportunism) on a peace platform in 1968 but didn't deliver on that promise until 1973.....tens of thousands of tragically wasted casualties later.
yes but.....how much earlier could he have gotten that done if he wasn't obsessed with being the first president to lose a war?
As it was he ran (with transparent opportunism) on a peace platform in 1968 but didn't deliver on that promise until 1973.....tens of thousands of tragically wasted casualties later.
You know what they had in Vietnam? Gunshields. How come they had to be reinvented for the scuffles we're now having in the mid-east?Nixon did in December '72 what LBJ should've done in '65 which is the unrestricted bombing of NV and mining Haiphong harbor. LBJ's insipid ROE on bombing cost us so many pilots killed, MIA and POW.
It could've ended in '65.
keep in mind it was a democratic president that got us into both the korean and vietnam wars and a republican that got us out.