• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Natasha Marley

There's good news and there's bad news.

The good news: Natasha Marley just shot a porn remake of Bonnie and Clyde (their spelling, "Bonny and Clide") for Bluebird Films. She plays the title role of Bonny. According to an interview conducted with the head of the company at the film's wrap party, Marley does boy/girl in the film. However, through their own admission they are going to tease the hell out of this thing up until its release. I guess Bluebird is keeping it hush-hush, sort of... And therein lies the bad news:

The film doesn't come out until September...
 
Here's the interview to which I was referring earlier:

http://sinninginla.com/articles/that%E2%80%99s-wrap-bluebird-films-celebrate-their-latest-adult-opus-%E2%80%9Cbonny-clide%E2%80%9D-big-time-bash

And here's the excerpt mentioning Marley:

“Natasha Marley is my co-star playing Miss Bonny Parker. She’s actually a porn virgin and had never done any boy-girl scenes on film before,” Chaplin explained. “She really nailed it and had a great feeling for the character. The thing about a big movie like this is that you have to have that trust with the director and the people you are working with.”

“When you see this trailer with no sex in it, it’s a great opportunity for people to look at her and go, ‘she can’t be a porn star.’ This is a girl that’s been on the front cover of GQ, Maxim and FHM. So we’re gonna tease people all the way through to September (the film’s release date) because you know it’s a great secret.”

Can't wait!! :nanner:
 
Here's the interview to which I was referring earlier:

http://sinninginla.com/articles/that%E2%80%99s-wrap-bluebird-films-celebrate-their-latest-adult-opus-%E2%80%9Cbonny-clide%E2%80%9D-big-time-bash

And here's the excerpt mentioning Marley:



Can't wait!! :nanner:

I don't want to rain on this parade, but I'm noticing a distinct absence of them saying "She is fucking guys in this film". Don't get me wrong - it'll be awesome if she is, but I'm sensing a build up to nothing here.

Does anyone have anything concrete?
 
She’s actually a porn virgin and had never done any boy-girl scenes on film before,”

Maybe this is arguing semantics here but I took his saying that she "had" never done any boy-girl as a confirmation, more or less. As in, past tense, i.e. - she had never until this film. Why would he be saying its a great secret if she were to only be doing girl-girl? Bluebird has already released a film with her doing girls. Not much of a secret. Just a thought.
 
The trailer looks sharp:

http://www.*************.com/wordpress_new/?p=3140

It seems like in a Bonnie and Clyde story, Bonnie would have to fuck Clyde...
 
Maybe this is arguing semantics here but I took his saying that she "had" never done any boy-girl as a confirmation, more or less. As in, past tense, i.e. - she had never until this film. Why would he be saying its a great secret if she were to only be doing girl-girl? Bluebird has already released a film with her doing girls. Not much of a secret. Just a thought.

I can't say whether it's true or not, but deceiving people has always been a big part of porn. It's not exactly the most ethical industry out there. Playing off semantics to make people believe something that may or may not be true is something most porners would have no qualms about doing. It's better to take everything that's said, and most definitely everything that implied with a huge pinch of salt and not to believe anything until it happens.

It's often best to ignore it anyhow until people know for sure otherwise people just feed the whole mechanism that makes producers think they should do it. Doing that also might make them say what's really going to happen sooner just let people know and keep them interested. (Not that holding back information like this is actually a tactically smart move for them. Building real notoriety is an important part of marketing people in this industry, and wasting time doing it just deprives the model and the producer of it. All it can accomplish is wasting a true valuable buildup if true and pissing fans off it if doesn't come to pass. I notice a similar things happening with other performers Bluebird is going to work with. Maybe somebody there is just that cerebral, knows what they are doing more than anybody else, and somehow this will work out, but I doubt it. More than likely they are just outsmarting themselves.
 
Maybe this is arguing semantics here but I took his saying that she "had" never done any boy-girl as a confirmation, more or less. As in, past tense, i.e. - she had never until this film. Why would he be saying its a great secret if she were to only be doing girl-girl? Bluebird has already released a film with her doing girls. Not much of a secret. Just a thought.

Dude, I'm with you. I would LOVE to see it, but like the bloke above me has said - porn isn't exactly the most honest industry out there. Also, when saying that Bonnie and Clyde have to fuck because they fucked in real life?This isn't a remake, it's a "reimagining" if you will, and the directors could easily get around this when making the movie (I don't know about you, but I've never been half way through watching a skin flick and stop whacking it because the plot isn't factual).

Like I said - don't get me wrong, I'm hoping against hope to see this beautiful woman take it like a champ, but until I see a screenshot or clip that shows her taking dick, I ain't gonna believe it because let's face it - we've all been lied to before... MANY times!! If it wasn't for the fact that for every 10 out of 10 stunner that WON'T fuck on film, there's a shit load of 8 out of 10 (plus the occassional fucking glamour!!) who will, I'd give up on porn for good!!

tl;dr: don't count your chickens...
 
Top