MomPov
Approved Content Owner
James, There seems to be a huge difference, a difference between night and day between the Male Talent pool and female talent pool on Mompov VS. Girlsdoporn. You really blow the male talent of GDP out of the water, with everything, including the facials/cumshots-heck you might even top Peter North on thatThe guy that fucked Miss Teen Delaware on GDP comes closest to you as far as talent level but no where near your league. As far, as the girls go, I think GDP is light years ahead of mompov in their talent and recruitment of women. Therefore, I ask you these 2 questions that only you can probably answer: Question #1. With GDP being such a good site with gorgeous girl next door type girls, how come they cannot find good male talent to fuck for them, at least someone that can do 50-75% of your performance on camera? Question #2. On the flip side, not that your women on MOMPOV are garbage, but how come your recruiting and female talent are not even close to GDP's? I would think you use the same methods for recruiting, pay the same, etc? So why such big discrepancies regarding both male and female talent on each sites?
I can't comment on the male talent for GDP cause I don't really watch the videos... but I do know good Male talent isn't easy to find.
As far as the models/recruiting. Theres one HUGE, MAJOR difference between mompov and girlsdoporn... the age of the models. I could go pretty deep into some theories having to do with the differences between the two age groups on a psychological level....there's plenty. The other age difference factor is that women tend to lose their bodies with age... whether its having kids, not taking proper care of themselves and the effect of gravity. I personally know women who were GDP material at age 19 and later in their 20's/30's got fat and ugly.
The other problem is a LOT of the best MILF candidates who contact me have already been in porn.... not true amateurs. GDP's model candidates have only been legal for a year or 2, maybe 3 so there's a much higher chance they will be an amateur first timer.
I am not giving excuses but its not possible to compare GDP models to MomPov. Anyway, some of the models I thought were my worst, ended up being very popular. For example, I didn't want to add Rachel to the site, she definitely wasn't my personal 'cup of tea', and she went on to be one of the members favorites.
Will always try to get the best first time amateurs I can... of course, sprinkled in with a few who have done a few gigs in the past. Its always a challenge.
