Came across an article a colleague forwarded to me. Thought it was very interesting!
This can have potentially faaaaaaar reaching consequences, IMHO.
cheers,
Premium Link UpgradeThe new science of resuscitation is changing the way doctors think about heart attacks—and death itself.
May 7, 2007 issue - Consider someone who has just died of a heart ******. His organs are intact, he hasn't lost *****. All that's happened is his heart has stopped beating—the definition of "clinical death"—and his brain has shut down to conserve oxygen. But what has actually died?
As recently as 1993, when Dr. Sherwin Nuland wrote the best seller "How We Die," the conventional answer was that it was his cells that had died. The patient couldn't be revived because the tissues of his brain and heart had suffered irreversible damage from lack of oxygen. This process was understood to begin after just four or five minutes. If the patient doesn't receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation within that time, and if his heart can't be restarted soon thereafter, he is unlikely to recover. That dogma went unquestioned until researchers actually looked at oxygen-starved heart cells under a microscope.
What they saw amazed them, according to Dr. Lance Becker, an authority on emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. "After one hour," he says, "we couldn't see evidence the cells had died. We thought we'd done something wrong." In fact, cells cut off from their ***** supply died only hours later.
This can have potentially faaaaaaar reaching consequences, IMHO.
cheers,