Re: [2/2] Partnership, no "blame" only "unhealthy" and moving forward ...
In fact, in many states, adultery is rather interesting as well when it comes to a marriage.
But that matters not, what matters is that two people care for each others values and pleasure.
That is clearly not happening here -- it's not about "respect" or "right/wrong" or "required/optional."
It's about two people finding happiness with one another, and it's clear one is not happy.
And yes, that includes having little to no sexual relations, and it's not wrong to desire such.
And it's not wrong to ask of your wife, your partner, to please you, and ask her to go to counseling with you for it.
Being a wife of his children is more than just a mother, it's still about her being a wife, which he desires.
If she is "disinterested" in sex, then that is "unhealthy" for the marriage when he wants it.
I'm not "blaming" her, I'm just saying it's "unhealthy" and she should not be against trying to change that.
Now yes, we're only getting one side of the story, but a marriage without sexual relations when one partner wants them is "unhealthy."
I'm not being judgmental or anything else, but it's the fact that one partner has an unfulfilled need.
And the need is not unexpected in a typical marriage, not that I'm into "typical," but he's not asking her to have a 3-way.
My continued point is that he needs to use a less argumentative phrase to get his point across, whether she changes or not.
But you also used other comments that I think do not apply here.
And I took the time to explore all these, in depth, so you should see my point.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
This will be my only response, as all I can say further is, "you're doing it again."data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
This guy actually cares deeply for his wife and family, and it really takes love and dedication to do what he does.
I didn't agree with it either, but my point is, and I hope you recognize this, that the whole "abuse" or "respect" concept doesn't matter.My point was that he typed the following:
'I view her disinterest in sex as abuse...'
And I disagreed with that.
There are many things not explicitly stated in the contract, including not running out on the family, etc...There is no sexual agreement in a marriage contract.
In fact, in many states, adultery is rather interesting as well when it comes to a marriage.
But that matters not, what matters is that two people care for each others values and pleasure.
That is clearly not happening here -- it's not about "respect" or "right/wrong" or "required/optional."
It's about two people finding happiness with one another, and it's clear one is not happy.
And yes, that includes having little to no sexual relations, and it's not wrong to desire such.
And it's not wrong to ask of your wife, your partner, to please you, and ask her to go to counseling with you for it.
Then why is she married to him? Why is she still his wife?And if she is 'disinterested' in having sex with him then that does not mean she is not a good wife either because we do not know why she is 'disinterested'.
Being a wife of his children is more than just a mother, it's still about her being a wife, which he desires.
If she is "disinterested" in sex, then that is "unhealthy" for the marriage when he wants it.
I'm not "blaming" her, I'm just saying it's "unhealthy" and she should not be against trying to change that.
Now yes, we're only getting one side of the story, but a marriage without sexual relations when one partner wants them is "unhealthy."
I'm not being judgmental or anything else, but it's the fact that one partner has an unfulfilled need.
And the need is not unexpected in a typical marriage, not that I'm into "typical," but he's not asking her to have a 3-way.
And I wholly agreed that using the word "abuse" is just inappropriate.I am typing what I think. And I do it in the hope that it will help him. It does not read to me that he respects his wife as much as he seems to think he does. And I think he should be made aware of that possibility.
My continued point is that he needs to use a less argumentative phrase to get his point across, whether she changes or not.
But you also used other comments that I think do not apply here.
And I took the time to explore all these, in depth, so you should see my point.
Then you didn't read what I said, and utterly missed my points.You apparently believe he respects her. I am not so sure.
This will be my only response, as all I can say further is, "you're doing it again."
This guy actually cares deeply for his wife and family, and it really takes love and dedication to do what he does.