Madison Ivy

Well, I was wrong...

Grew the balls to ask Madison if she is retired on her official instagram page and actually got a reply:

"no, i did not retire im under contract with #Brazzers so that's the only place you'll see new stuff of me"

so, nice of her to reply but does raise a couple of questions:

1) I thought her contract ended in July: did they re-sign her and just not publicize it?

2) If true, is Brazzers really that stupid to just not release any new content of her for months? I mean she is a superstar in the business, why sign her and then not use her?
 
I'm just baffled by brazzers inability to shoot the **** out of her and pump out a scene like every month

That's what I don't get. You have one of the top 3-5 stars in the business signed to an exclusive deal, you do the anal scene which is great, but basically nothing else.... it makes zero sense...

It should NEVER come to fans thinking she is retired.
 
I'm just baffled by brazzers inability to shoot the **** out of her and pump out a scene like every month

That's what I don't get. You have one of the top 3-5 stars in the business signed to an exclusive deal, you do the anal scene which is great, but basically nothing else.... it makes zero sense...

It should NEVER come to fans thinking she is retired.

I've commented many times on the topic as well. It just makes no sense. Of course it makes sense from the girl's perspective - she gets a guaranteed payday and doesn't have to produce much content. But I don't get why the company, in this case Brazzers, would sign them and then not use them. I understand the financial advantage of having her as an exclusive to your site, but don't you lose that advantage if you don't have her work? Like what's the point? We're over 9 months into the year and she has only appeared on Brazzers 4 times in 2014. I understand she performs for other sites for the same company, but how can your premiere contract star only have 4 scenes in a year?

A good example of what we should be seeing is Kayla Kayden, the new it-girl on Brazzers. She has a new scene every couple weeks, that's how it should be done. I mean Madison should at worst have 1 scene a month. Is 12 scenes in a year really so much to ask? I wouldn't mind having a job where I only had to work 12 days a year. Not blaming Madison, if she can get that deal she should of course. I'm just questioning what in god's name Brazzers is thinking. They're basically paying top dollar to take a girl off the market.
 
I've commented many times on the topic as well. It just makes no sense. Of course it makes sense from the girl's perspective - she gets a guaranteed payday and doesn't have to produce much content. But I don't get why the company, in this case Brazzers, would sign them and then not use them. I understand the financial advantage of having her as an exclusive to your site, but don't you lose that advantage if you don't have her work? Like what's the point? We're over 9 months into the year and she has only appeared on Brazzers 4 times in 2014. I understand she performs for other sites for the same company, but how can your premiere contract star only have 4 scenes in a year?

A good example of what we should be seeing is Kayla Kayden, the new it-girl on Brazzers. She has a new scene every couple weeks, that's how it should be done. I mean Madison should at worst have 1 scene a month. Is 12 scenes in a year really so much to ask? I wouldn't mind having a job where I only had to work 12 days a year. Not blaming Madison, if she can get that deal she should of course. I'm just questioning what in god's name Brazzers is thinking. They're basically paying top dollar to take a girl off the market.

I completely agree and I would love to read that contract.
My only real doubt is...what if Madison wanted to shoot only...I don't know, maybe 5 scenes to Brazzers this year?
As I said I agree and it makes no sense at all but what if Madison is the one part that wanted only a few scenes? Brazzers could have put that in balance and still thought it would be a good deal.
She would come up with only a few scenes but all of these would be Brazzers scenes...
 
I completely agree and I would love to read that contract.
My only real doubt is...what if Madison wanted to shoot only...I don't know, maybe 5 scenes to Brazzers this year?
As I said I agree and it makes no sense at all but what if Madison is the one part that wanted only a few scenes? Brazzers could have put that in balance and still thought it would be a good deal.
She would come up with only a few scenes but all of these would be Brazzers scenes...

I think you're right. Both Brazzers and Madison took a lot of heat during the first contract for delays in releasing the overly hyped anal debut scene. I figured both would go their separate ways after July 1, 2014 and Madison would cash in by shooting lots of new content for other companies.

As others have stated, Brazzers has been releasing 1-3 monthly scenes lately for their other contract girls Kayla Kayden and Nina Elle. It looks like Madison only wants to shoot a few scenes each year and Brazzers is willing to continue to pay her exclusive rates for them.
 
I think you're right. Both Brazzers and Madison took a lot of heat during the first contract for delays in releasing the overly hyped anal debut scene. I figured both would go their separate ways after July 1, 2014 and Madison would cash in by shooting lots of new content for other companies.

As others have stated, Brazzers has been releasing 1-3 monthly scenes lately for their other contract girls Kayla Kayden and Nina Elle. It looks like Madison only wants to shoot a few scenes each year and Brazzers is willing to continue to pay her exclusive rates for them.

That's what baffles me the most. Not that I'm an expert on Brazzers' financials, but it just seems hard to believe it's worth it for them. She's popular but there's lots of popular girls on that site. Hard to imagine they're getting their moneys worth.
 
Back
Top