• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!
Brazzers is gunna have a class action lawsuit from all those people that got full year memberships on their hands if they don't shoot that anal scene with her soon they only got two more months and she is off contract.
 
Brazzers is gunna have a class action lawsuit from all those people that got full year memberships on their hands if they don't shoot that anal scene with her soon they only got two more months and she is off contract.

at this point, I am rooting for this more than the scene itself... they deserve it
 
Brazzers is gunna have a class action lawsuit from all those people that got full year memberships on their hands if they don't shoot that anal scene with her soon they only got two more months and she is off contract.

Nonsense. Nowhere in the sign-up details is it explicitly stated that they promise to provide a Madison anal scene within the timeframe of any member's membership, and when you are talking about the LEGALITY of these things, things have to be stated explicitly, or they don't hold up in court. Brazzers' lawyers would piss themselves laughing over a member or members threatening legal action over failure to provide a single scene of any nature.
 
Nonsense. Nowhere in the sign-up details is it explicitly stated that they promise to provide a Madison anal scene within the timeframe of any member's membership, and when you are talking about the LEGALITY of these things, things have to be stated explicitly, or they don't hold up in court. Brazzers' lawyers would piss themselves laughing over a member or members threatening legal action over failure to provide a single scene of any nature.

Their promotion/advertisement was that Madison Ivy, as their first contract girl, was going to be featured in her first ever anal scene. Her contract, and time as a contract girl, is over on July 1, 2014. Therefore, if we are getting into technicalities and what will hold up in court, if the scene isn't available for members by July 1, 2014 this is false advertisement and should absolutely hold up in court.
 
Their promotion/advertisement was that Madison Ivy, as their first contract girl, was going to be featured in her first ever anal scene. Her contract, and time as a contract girl, is over on July 1, 2014. Therefore, if we are getting into technicalities and what will hold up in court, if the scene isn't available for members by July 1, 2014 this is false advertisement and should absolutely hold up in court.

!!!! Nuke Brazzers! Ban them for this bullshit!
 
Man, I would love to hear the opening arguments in the court case of the fraudulent anal scene.

"Your honour, my client has paid the incredible sum of $29.99 per month under the assumption he would eventually see Madison Ivy and only Madison Ivy take cock up her asshole... not a finger, not a dildo, but a hard cock. Your honour, we don't even know if such a scene exists... if it does we demand it be released immediately so my client can stroke his cock while staring intently at the aforementioned model's gaping anus. Your honour, the delay in releasing this scene has caused my client undue stress and pain and suffering. As a punitive measure, we demand that this anal scene be interracial (preferably with Mandingo) and that ass to mouth action be mandatory with several midgets joining in at the end for a massive facial cumshot."
 
Their promotion/advertisement was that Madison Ivy, as their first contract girl, was going to be featured in her first ever anal scene. Her contract, and time as a contract girl, is over on July 1, 2014. Therefore, if we are getting into technicalities and what will hold up in court, if the scene isn't available for members by July 1, 2014 this is false advertisement and should absolutely hold up in court.

No. Basic contract law. The terms and conditions that the members read and agree to (which say nothing about any particular performer or scene) before they sign up would be read aloud, the company can prove that they fulfilled their side of their contract, and the case would be dismissed in about two minutes. Technicalities is precisely why this lawsuit conversation is a load of rubbish ; there is no legal requirement of Brazzers as per their T&C to provide a Madi anal scene. People signed up and received what they paid for as per the T&C. Zero case to answer.

On a personal note, anyone signing up for a membership on the basis of ONE scene, before said scene has been filmed and published, is a dribbling idiot.
 
No. Basic contract law. The terms and conditions that the members read and agree to (which say nothing about any particular performer or scene) before they sign up would be read aloud, the company can prove that they fulfilled their side of their contract, and the case would be dismissed in about two minutes. Technicalities is precisely why this lawsuit conversation is a load of rubbish ; there is no legal requirement of Brazzers as per their T&C to provide a Madi anal scene. People signed up and received what they paid for as per the T&C. Zero case to answer.

On a personal note, anyone signing up for a membership on the basis of ONE scene, before said scene has been filmed and published, is a dribbling idiot.

Agreed with you on the second part. I have never been a member of a porn site and never will be. So, I certainly wouldn't do it just for one scene.

While I understand your other points and thing it's a terrific argument, I still think there would be something that could be done for false advertisement, though. They advertised something and didn't deliver it. At that point it's not even so much about the members who paid as it is just a case of false advertising to anyone and every one.

Brazzers should not have advertised the scene until it was shot. And they didn't just do it once, they did it a few times. Heck, does anyone know if it has been shot at this point?
 
Heck, does anyone know if it has been shot at this point?

It has not. If it had, she would have tweeted about it, and said tweets would have been posted here by people saying "AT LAST!"

I've never known a bumhole to create so much conversation. As a big fan of Madi, it's no skin off my knob whether she does anal or not. I just enjoy watching her suck and fuck.
 
Last edited:
It has not. If it had, she would have tweeted about it, and said tweets would have been posted here by people saying "AT LAST!"

I've never known a bumhole to create so much conversation. As a big fan of Madi, it's no skin off my knob whether she does anal or not. I just enjoy watching her suck and fuck.

well said
 
Top