Lucy Pinder OR Taylor Kennedy?

Superfly said:
^Id say shes natural,
I Believe she is 100% natural too, but she could be a natural C or D and have a little "uplift."
Given her age, I doubt that, but you never know until you see them nude and swaying.
Superfly said:
i have to agree with people who find her annoying she doesnt show her nipples.
Especially with the many shoots shes done with michelle marsh who always remains fully topless on her own.
I disagree, I think it's just fine that she teases us.
Especially since there's nothing to indicate that she's not 100% natural.

Besides, I have a serious fetish to fill up bikini tops, bras and other tops with a healthy load of semen.
So she doesn't need to take anything off to satisfy me. ;)
 
Lucy is the hottest. I dont even know who the other girl is, but round here every bloke knows who Lucy is.
 
BigSwede said:
I hope Taylor doesn´t see this if she comes back.
What a letdown.:)
Taylor is very beautiful, no doubt, and she's the more raven brunette I go for.
But Lucy has been teasing a lot of men and holding their fancy, and anticipation is sometimes the biggest draw.
Yes, Lucy looks more natural than Taylor, so I'm going to typically go for Lucy, but as I noted in another thread, I haven't seen them in motion nude, so I can't be sure.
But I love them both and I really don't like these "versus" contests -- especially when people say one babe is out of the class of another.
No, it's more like people associate Taylor with other "glamour pinups" and Lucy with more "page 3" type impromptu photos.
 
jumbo_jim said:
both in my opinion are slightley over-rated
There are a lot of men who think brunettes are the most beautiful, especially those with curves.
They also might think they are "under-rated" in return, myself included. ;)

I'm sure Lucy also gets a boost from being a non-nude model, that anticipation does a lot for popularity.
Otherwise most actresses would not be lusted after nearly as much.
 
Top