Karla Spice

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
To be honest, I really like this girl's looks, but once you hit the 50-page mark, you've officially got Next-Door-Nikki syndrome. "Oooo, a nipple!" And then - nothing for another year or two.

Tease models are like politicians... they promise the world for years, don't deliver, and then give a hint of backing up their word so that the suckers come flocking back saying, "I knew it! She's going to show it all!" Just don't expect this lady to show up on Jerry Springer. Time for greener pastures...

I agree, that's why I wait until they start doing more. I'm not anyone's lap dog or sugar daddy.
 
To be honest, I really like this girl's looks, but once you hit the 50-page mark, you've officially got Next-Door-Nikki syndrome. "Oooo, a nipple!" And then - nothing for another year or two.

Tease models are like politicians... they promise the world for years, don't deliver, and then give a hint of backing up their word so that the suckers come flocking back saying, "I knew it! She's going to show it all!" Just don't expect this lady to show up on Jerry Springer. Time for greener pastures...

True, but she is way hotter than all these other skanks on the net.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
True, but she is way hotter than all these other skanks on the net.

She is? She's nice looking and who are you to judge the others by calling them "skanks"? "nono"

She's stringing people along and taking their money.
Like Next Door Nikki. Then Nikki turns up on Springer and shows them more than she was showing her paying fans. That was nice of her. :crash:
Thankfully, I never bought into her act.


"Oooo, a nipple!"

:D
 
She is? She's nice looking and who are you to judge the others by calling them "skanks"? "nono"

She's stringing people along and taking their money.
Like Next Door Nikki. Then Nikki turns up on Springer and shows them more than she was showing her paying fans. That was nice of her. :crash:
Thankfully, I never bought into her act.




:D

For years Karla's site had a easy to read statement that said "this is a non-nude site"; so how is that stringing someone along? Easy to read, easy to understand, so anyone expecting more have no one to blame but themselves. Swear before God, I wish I had a cute face, two coconuts and bouncy rump, because thats all the string I need.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
For years Karla's site had a easy to read statement that said "this is a non-nude site"; so how is that stringing someone along? Easy to read, easy to understand, so anyone expecting more have no one to blame but themselves. Swear before God, I wish I had a cute face, two coconuts and bouncy rump, because thats all the string I need.

Non-nude would mean no boobies either.

But, now she does show them. :tongue:

So, it is stinging people along. They think she's going to show more and more.
Hopefully she will.
 
Non-nude would mean no boobies either.

But, now she does show them. :tongue:

So, it is stinging people along. They think she's going to show more and more.
Hopefully she will.

First you agreed that she's like a politician, promising something for YEARS then you write in your next post that she is stringing someone along, which is another way in my book of saying she's trying to deceive someone. When has she promised you or anyone something and not delivered?

Yeah, here's your own words: *they think* she is, but Karla never promised to show more and more. Moaning about how long it's taking her to lose the bra and panties is a waste of time, i take what i can get then move on.
 
Karla's site now has the statement "This is a Non-Nude and Topless Site." Which raises the question: just how far can you go and still be considered non-nude? In the end I think it isn't how much or little the model is wearing, but how much she is showing. From the looks of other "non-nude" sites it appears you can show your tits and your ass but not your pussy, which would make every Playboyboy Centerfold before 1973 "non-nude."

BTW, I just perused Karla's latest gallery (11/14) and it is absolutely sensational, by far the best set she's done in some time.
 

Kellie

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Karla's site now has the statement "This is a Non-Nude and Topless Site." Which raises the question: just how far can you go and still be considered non-nude? In the end I think it isn't how much or little the model is wearing, but how much she is showing. From the looks of other "non-nude" sites it appears you can show your tits and your ass but not your pussy, which would make every Playboyboy Centerfold before 1973 "non-nude."

BTW, I just perused Karla's latest gallery (11/14) and it is absolutely sensational, by far the best set she's done in some time.

The reason its states it a Non Nude and Topless Site, is because she still updates with NN sets along with her Topless ones, and her site was NN for a few years (so most of the site NN from previous sets). So it says it's both, so people don't join the site assuming the ENTIRE site is Topless.
 
Top