http://www.**********/channel/Felix_Flow/Kari_Sweets/Self_Pics
-
Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
-
FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!
Kari Sweets
- Thread starter MASAMUNE
- Start date
finally she's shaved again :nanner:
something new to me, enjoy
h t t p :// ********** .*********** . com/ ?q=kari+sweets
Awesome post!
The problem with Kari is the following:
Kari's issue with not showing nipples or twat is not a moral issue.
This is what is pissing off so many guys who are less able to write what they are feeling than am I.
In a nutshell, Kari is an Internet Whore.
Let me be clear about this:
Any woman who posts pictures of herself on the Internet with her pussy hair visible, 3 fingers over her twat, a finger over each nipple, and so on, is a whore who has no moral qualms whatsoever about showing any part of her body.
She doesn't show her pussy or nipples because it is less profitable to show them than to not show them.
Get it?
Internalize that.
She's not going to "get it over with." She's not going to have some revelation.
It's a numbers game.
Does anybody with a brain who is reading this really believe that this woman in not showing her nipples because she thinks it would be wrong to do so?
Or because she is shy or embarrassed?
People, wake up.
If she can make more money with her hands on her nips, she'd be a fool to show more.
She's one of the few models who has, right from day 1, not allowed any images to leak out showing nips or slit.
Think about it.
The only people signing up on Kate's Playground site are those who haven't figured out how to find the 5 dozen or so videos on the Net of her dildoing herself or fingering or whatever.
Likewise, Nicole from Camwithher had some pics and video get out with nipple and slot showing, but they worked like mad to suppress them as much as possible.
Why? Because there are a lot of guys who impulse buy a month subscription because they are unaware that the full nudes and such are out there to be found.
Who buys a Kari subscription?
Type A - hard core Kari fans who just love her and want to get her releases instantly.
Type B - guys who stumble upon her one day, spend 3 hours searching the Internet for her, then finally blow the 27 bucks only to find out there's nothing at KS.com that isn't at google.com.
As for some guy's comment that her splash page says "no nudity". Sure it does. It's the last line on the page and it's in 4 point font.
If Kari ends up posting nude pics, then 1/2 to 4/5th of the Type B guys will blow their loads before they get to KS.com, and then revenue goes down.
This chick is a businesswoman. She will stuff a bat up her ass for you when and only when it's sufficiently profitable.
Kari's issue with not showing nipples or twat is not a moral issue.
This is what is pissing off so many guys who are less able to write what they are feeling than am I.
In a nutshell, Kari is an Internet Whore.
Let me be clear about this:
Any woman who posts pictures of herself on the Internet with her pussy hair visible, 3 fingers over her twat, a finger over each nipple, and so on, is a whore who has no moral qualms whatsoever about showing any part of her body.
She doesn't show her pussy or nipples because it is less profitable to show them than to not show them.
Get it?
Internalize that.
She's not going to "get it over with." She's not going to have some revelation.
It's a numbers game.
Does anybody with a brain who is reading this really believe that this woman in not showing her nipples because she thinks it would be wrong to do so?
Or because she is shy or embarrassed?
People, wake up.
If she can make more money with her hands on her nips, she'd be a fool to show more.
She's one of the few models who has, right from day 1, not allowed any images to leak out showing nips or slit.
Think about it.
The only people signing up on Kate's Playground site are those who haven't figured out how to find the 5 dozen or so videos on the Net of her dildoing herself or fingering or whatever.
Likewise, Nicole from Camwithher had some pics and video get out with nipple and slot showing, but they worked like mad to suppress them as much as possible.
Why? Because there are a lot of guys who impulse buy a month subscription because they are unaware that the full nudes and such are out there to be found.
Who buys a Kari subscription?
Type A - hard core Kari fans who just love her and want to get her releases instantly.
Type B - guys who stumble upon her one day, spend 3 hours searching the Internet for her, then finally blow the 27 bucks only to find out there's nothing at KS.com that isn't at google.com.
As for some guy's comment that her splash page says "no nudity". Sure it does. It's the last line on the page and it's in 4 point font.
If Kari ends up posting nude pics, then 1/2 to 4/5th of the Type B guys will blow their loads before they get to KS.com, and then revenue goes down.
This chick is a businesswoman. She will stuff a bat up her ass for you when and only when it's sufficiently profitable.
I have two things to say:
1. She's not a whore, she's a stripper... either way your argument holds as far as the morals go. Whores sell phisical and involve a partner, strippers sell visual only, and have no partner. Just wanted to mention that. Strippers by the way, make more money than whores in the real world as well. A stripper services multiple customers simultaneously in a club, while a whore services one customer at a time....More paying customers = more revenue....
UNLESS the whoreness is mass produced and sold as porno, in which case whores can make more money than strippers. So does your second argument hold? Lets see....
2. Going back to your comment, I think there's another group: type C. This is the group that refuses to join simply because she wont go nude (Pretty much the people on these boards). This group claims that they would join immediately as soon as she does... of course this is not a promise they will keep. They will get their hands on the content and keep their cash in their wallets. So you're right about her maximizing her profitability!
Conclusion:
If she wants to stay away from hardcore porno (mass produced) then she should stick with what she's doing already and not reveal any more and everything you mentioned is completely logical and valid.
If she wanted to simply maximize her profitability she WOULD get into hardcore porno and she WOULD shove a bat up her butt cuz you KNOW you would join just to see that! LOL
There's my 2 cents
1. She's not a whore, she's a stripper... either way your argument holds as far as the morals go. Whores sell phisical and involve a partner, strippers sell visual only, and have no partner. Just wanted to mention that. Strippers by the way, make more money than whores in the real world as well. A stripper services multiple customers simultaneously in a club, while a whore services one customer at a time....More paying customers = more revenue....
UNLESS the whoreness is mass produced and sold as porno, in which case whores can make more money than strippers. So does your second argument hold? Lets see....
2. Going back to your comment, I think there's another group: type C. This is the group that refuses to join simply because she wont go nude (Pretty much the people on these boards). This group claims that they would join immediately as soon as she does... of course this is not a promise they will keep. They will get their hands on the content and keep their cash in their wallets. So you're right about her maximizing her profitability!
Conclusion:
If she wants to stay away from hardcore porno (mass produced) then she should stick with what she's doing already and not reveal any more and everything you mentioned is completely logical and valid.
If she wanted to simply maximize her profitability she WOULD get into hardcore porno and she WOULD shove a bat up her butt cuz you KNOW you would join just to see that! LOL
There's my 2 cents
what is this? the pornographic legislation act?
if the day comes and she does put a bat in her butt let it be plastic cuz I'm pretty sure the wooden ones might leave splinters.
http://www.petitenympha.com/st/niches/kari-sweet.shtml
http://www.petitenympha.com/st/niches/kari-sweet.shtml
Nowhere, she's a non-nude model (until now)
lol that first one looks almost real
First image is fake
No shit sherlock
Similar threads
