Kari Sweets
- Thread starter MASAMUNE
- Start date
The part that cracks me up about all this is that it seems that a large proportion of the guys who are upset that KSweets is a "non-nude" model seem to actually believe one or both of the following:
1) That she would make more money if she went nude.
2) That she has some sort of moral prohibition about going nude.
As to 1, it's clear as day that the whole "non-nude" scam is the best way to separate horney guys from their money.
It's like I said before, who the hell would ever pay to join a Sylvia Saint site? I mean, you could download free stuff all day from all over seeing her doing every thing.
So it's like that. As soon as KSweets puts out the nude pics, they are all over the Inet and every forum and ******* server will post and pump them out until every horney guy has shot his jizz looking at them. And at that point, who the hell wants to pay 29 bucks a month to see more of the same.
So the scam is, get the suckers to believe they might see more if they join. If you've already shown the "more", then you **** the incentive to join.
As to 2, I find the thought that this woman may have some sort of moral issue with showing her nipples to be quite hilarious. The fact is, she sells her body for money. I have no doubt that if you offered her double the amount she's now earning for the next 20 years, she'll have the pink beaver out before you could get your checkbook out. Further - and I think this applies to any woman who is willing to show most/all of her body on the Inet, this is about prostitution. I show you my tits/ass/cameltoe/whatever, and you give me money. If you offered this woman 2 million dollars to do a hardcore scene, you'd see her in a hardcore scene.
Why? Because women with a moral prohibition against using their bodies to give men erections for money won't use their bodies at all for that purpose, and women without that moral prohibition will do anything - if the money is right.
So, I predict that if/when she thinks that showing her nipple will result in more money, you'll see that.
IMO she's looking older all the time. Went from cute teen to soccer *** really quickly.
:thumbsup:
1) That she would make more money if she went nude.
2) That she has some sort of moral prohibition about going nude.
As to 1, it's clear as day that the whole "non-nude" scam is the best way to separate horney guys from their money.
It's like I said before, who the hell would ever pay to join a Sylvia Saint site? I mean, you could download free stuff all day from all over seeing her doing every thing.
So it's like that. As soon as KSweets puts out the nude pics, they are all over the Inet and every forum and ******* server will post and pump them out until every horney guy has shot his jizz looking at them. And at that point, who the hell wants to pay 29 bucks a month to see more of the same.
So the scam is, get the suckers to believe they might see more if they join. If you've already shown the "more", then you **** the incentive to join.
As to 2, I find the thought that this woman may have some sort of moral issue with showing her nipples to be quite hilarious. The fact is, she sells her body for money. I have no doubt that if you offered her double the amount she's now earning for the next 20 years, she'll have the pink beaver out before you could get your checkbook out. Further - and I think this applies to any woman who is willing to show most/all of her body on the Inet, this is about prostitution. I show you my tits/ass/cameltoe/whatever, and you give me money. If you offered this woman 2 million dollars to do a hardcore scene, you'd see her in a hardcore scene.
Why? Because women with a moral prohibition against using their bodies to give men erections for money won't use their bodies at all for that purpose, and women without that moral prohibition will do anything - if the money is right.
So, I predict that if/when she thinks that showing her nipple will result in more money, you'll see that.
IMO she's looking older all the time. Went from cute teen to soccer *** really quickly.
:thumbsup:
Well put! I have thought this myself, but was too lazy to type it all out. Another point about Kari or whatever her name is...after she shows what it is that she has, it may not be that impressive....i.e., britney and her upskirts. I would have to say, britney's beav wasn't up to the std I thought it would be.
I was with you all the way until the last sentence dude. Matter of fact I almost typed something like this myself though not nearly as long. If she went nude, her membership would probably skyrocket for a couple of months, and then it would probably plummet for good. The tease thing is what keeps guys interested, and her and her webmaster know it. She's smart for not showing it. It gives her longevity.
But she still looks great, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about there.
JoeBlooso,
I kind of disagree. I have one internet membership online, which happens to be the Playboy Cyber Club, and have for years. I understand what you are saying about how she is making money by not showing anything, but there are a hell of alot more people who would probably join the site if she did do nude. I wonder how many people see this beautiful girl online, go to the site, and then sees non-nude on the title for 30.00 a month and says, yeah right? At least I'm logical about this, I'm not gonna pay it. Alot of others probably say that.
I know some people enjoy the non-nude thing and all, but for 30.00 a month, c'mon. As for you argument about her going nude would get out on the internet, true, but people are looking at the same content here as they are on the site, so what is the difference? It would be the same. If she went full nude I'm sure it would get out on the internet, but not all of it and that is what makes people join. The unknown content. If that was the case I probably would pay for the content, and I'm sure many others.
I kind of disagree. I have one internet membership online, which happens to be the Playboy Cyber Club, and have for years. I understand what you are saying about how she is making money by not showing anything, but there are a hell of alot more people who would probably join the site if she did do nude. I wonder how many people see this beautiful girl online, go to the site, and then sees non-nude on the title for 30.00 a month and says, yeah right? At least I'm logical about this, I'm not gonna pay it. Alot of others probably say that.
I know some people enjoy the non-nude thing and all, but for 30.00 a month, c'mon. As for you argument about her going nude would get out on the internet, true, but people are looking at the same content here as they are on the site, so what is the difference? It would be the same. If she went full nude I'm sure it would get out on the internet, but not all of it and that is what makes people join. The unknown content. If that was the case I probably would pay for the content, and I'm sure many others.
You know what I really think about this???too much blabla let's see some tits!!!!!!hahaha I'm joking of course ...what you say makes a lot of sense but to be honest I don't come on this forum once or twice a week to read that kind of stuff,so please stop that...thanks you.
No hard feelings...
No hard feelings...
I agree... that´s not the reason why we´re here! 
Fact, we´re the horny guys and we´re the one who scour the web for new hot pics of her! If she goes nude this Forum will be the first base to see the pics.
For example: Nikki went nude on Jerry Springer... I dunno if she has financial problems now because nobody wants to join her site anymore. but I don´t think so!.. Everybody is still horny for her!!!
cheers,...
Fact, we´re the horny guys and we´re the one who scour the web for new hot pics of her! If she goes nude this Forum will be the first base to see the pics. For example: Nikki went nude on Jerry Springer... I dunno if she has financial problems now because nobody wants to join her site anymore. but I don´t think so!.. Everybody is still horny for her!!!
cheers,...
I agree... that´s not the reason why we´re here!
For example: Nikki went nude on Jerry Springer... I dunno if she has financial problems now because nobody wants to join her site anymore. but I don´t think so!.. Everybody is still horny for her!!!
cheers,...
You think that was her on that video...what about the big tattooo on the front
that must be new
All my money to the guy who can hack her computer, i think her boyfriend have a lot of hard pics with her....
Of curse! why not?!.. do you think she has a clone?
