Actually... would it?
Since part of the issue was treatment of the pornstars (i.e. women), I would think anime wouldn't be covered.
Or would it?
Japan stops shooting porn after new law passed
- Thread starter hoochimama
- Start date
Since part of the issue was treatment of the pornstars (i.e. women), I would think anime wouldn't be covered.
Or would it?
Milky Cat seems to be fighting the good fight. I love their content.
https://www.tokyokinky.com/new-adult-video-parodies-porn-law-restrictions/
Cartoons are also not immune to censorship.
Last edited:
Yes, and correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK the new controversial laws don't apply, or at least have any implication to them.
Unless we're saying that voice actors in anime porn also have the veto power - which would be a clear overreach.
Spotlight on private and amateur porn as new adult video law loophole
https://www.tokyokinky.com/private-amateur-porn-japan-new-adult-video-law-loophole/
This seems like a huge oversight. I have to wonder if it's legally sound.
https://www.tokyokinky.com/private-amateur-porn-japan-new-adult-video-law-loophole/
This seems like a huge oversight. I have to wonder if it's legally sound.
So here's one with a female star with a strapon in the role of shotacon male superhero, getting raped/molested by a female supervillain. There is a male actor, but he's just floating around the background and doesn't really participate in the sex. No vaginal/anal of the "male" superhero - it's all about the strapon.
Would this be questionable content?
I know the definition of porn, its when the penis goes in.
So by that definition girl-on-girl isn't porn
Lewd acts and exposure of the genitals. One or the either or both.
Production is down but for many reasons. The ROI is just not what it used to be.
Live sex and STIs are in though.
Production is down but for many reasons. The ROI is just not what it used to be.
Live sex and STIs are in though.
Then you obviously don't.
Similar threads
