It's definitely better, but safer? I'm not sure about that. I'm practicing more unsafe sex than ever!
exactly what is better?
I guess if your'e a mega millionare or on welfare I would say youre right,
I was responding to the post above mine.
see, I believe that if you respond to the post above you that there is no reason to quote it in yours.
I also believe in The Loch Ness Monster.
Is the world safer? Absolutely not!
Do you mean as in America? No. As the rest of the world? No.
Sure if you're gonna add the hairy armpits that will always be unattractive as will the untamed bush that spreads down the thighs, hips, and up to the belly button.
Now a bush such as Bobbi Starr's here will show bush is good in moderation and if have a control over him, er, I mean, it.
http://pornstars.foxmagazine.com/072909/05/images/05.jpg
Yummy.
Bush is ok if kept at a minimum. Don't need a jungle but a nice walk in the lightly patched forest is nice.
I like body hair on an attractive woman.
Starr is definitely a great example.
i hate forests i just wanna burn them
You-are-just-fukin'-wrong!!!
I mean, you're right and all but that pic is just fuckin' wrong... I am so in favor of de-forestation
Some neatly trimmed, under control shrubbery is a welcomed change but the world is a better/safer place with out wild-wild Bush....:tongue:
I would worship a girl like Scotti Andrews from head to toe.
http://gallys.scoreland.com/pics/208.Claire.Lee.2411/
I like hairy dudes too, but I tend to put more qualifiers on that gender.
Just one bitch's opinion.
:dunno: I think the world would be a better, safer place if Bush was reined-in more.
Another time when we have to agree to disagree.
Oddly, this time my position is more liberal than yours.