Thoughts on 001/Raven/Free Speech...
Marie, Famousbabes, FreeOnes, and fellow members:
Firstly, FB and I have been friends for quite some time. I cannot reach the man anymore. He has disabled PMing and never shows up online in Yahoo or MSN when I'm there, so alerting him to this situation was not something I could have done. Trust me, as much as I worked with FB in the past when the Raven-Hunt was on, when 001 first popped up, I was all over it -- but I couldn't reach FB.
As to Marie, when 001 first came up and I IDed him, I PMed Marie about it, requesting a read receipt. The title of my PM was 001 = Lord Raven. That PM was sent about 2 months ago. I checked it around the time thfcmad and 001 and I had our "deal" to call off the "hunt." Marie either read my PM and didn't confirm receipt or she never read it. For all I know, it's still in her inbox or has been deleted.
I certainly have no authority to "make a deal" to ALLOW someone here, and I wish people would stop describing it as such. It sounds silly. "Nightfly and thfcmad had a deal to allow 001 to stay." I have no power to make such a decision, guys and gals. I only have my opinions on the matter. That's one of the reasons why 001 and thfcmad and I sat down via MSN and hammered out a truce. My understanding was that it was to be a quiet deal so that my friends and his friends would no longer badger and bait each other, take cheap shots at each other, etc. and that while we knew 001 to be Raven, we would let things lie since he had been a positive new member.
Additionally, I can only say that the parties involved in the prior ugliness with the Lord Raven persona have embraced the change as seen in 001. We've set aside our differences, talked about the mess that happened last year, and we're completely willing to get along with (and even enjoy) each other again. But that's not really what's important here. What's important is whether or not the administrator/board owner decides to let 001 stay.
We speak of free speech here in this thread and the issue of bans, etc. I am a great proponent of free speech, but WITHIN ESTABLISHED RULES. I know some will differ with me about this, but my opinion is this -- we DO NOT have a RIGHT to say whatever we want here, nor does FreeOnes HAVE to allow us to say whatever we want here. Message boards are NOT democratically elected fora where "majority rules." Message boards are little dictatorships or kingdoms. What the owner says GOES. The same applies to membership. Anyone an administrator does not want on the board can be ****** at his/her sole discretion, or by proxy through a moderator carrying out the admin's wishes.
All we can do, as members, and even some moderators who see the redemption of Lord Raven as 001, is voice our opinions and try to INFLUENCE the "king." I think 001 has shown himself a more mature and respectful person, a constructive and fun-loving poster, and valued member.
Lastly, and this is a topic which is a proximate result of all this and the Lisa Sparxxx scenario which unfolded over the last few days, is the issue of moderator consistency. It's been discussed already recently, and I hope it will be further still -- it's a tough issue, trying to get different people from different parts of the world and different tolerance levels to all apply rules equally to members and ***** members.
As an example of the consistency issue, we had members going to and fro with Lisa in the thread which was deleted, flaming all over the place, and one mod posted (right in the middle of all the hand grenades being tossed around!!!) "Great links, Lisa! Thanks!" or something like that, completely oblivious to the thread and its content!!! My JAW DROPPED when I saw that. Only after several bad post reports for flaming did someone else (mod) intervene.
I've got to wrap up this message, because it's getting so long that people might not read the whole thing. lol The bottom line seems to be this -- admin, mods, and members alike ALL want this to be a fun, enjoyable, and interesting place to read, post, and experience others and their opinions. I think we can pretty much all agree on that. 001 certainly embraces that and has long abandoned his shitty old ways. Call me a fool or naive, but I am a believer in forgiveness and redemption. And yes, I was directly involved in having MANY of Lord Raven's user IDs ******, so you might be shocked that I would embrace his return. The thing is that he is NOT coming back as Lord Raven. He's turned over a new leaf, so to speak, and I think maybe some consideration might be made of the redeeming qualities and posts to his credit as 001.
That's my :2 cents: for now.
Respectfully submitted,
Nightfly