Invented Unofficial Board Rules

[mentator75]

This thread is for a discussion of what you find annoying about other FO members who invent their own unofficial rules for what is, or what is not, a proper post on FO.

An example is the once-reoccurring objection (now obviated by the new sub-forums) of those you think that bi-sexual images are inappropriate for this Board.

My pet peeve is with those members who complain that a link contains images which are not "click-able" - that is, the images cannot be enlarged.

Why does that bother some members ?

This Board, I thought, was intended for the collection of free public material of all types, categorized as to particular women or themes.

Knowing that a set of photos exists on some website is very helpful information for other members, if they wish to visit or to join that website.

Any thoughts ?

 

[Spleen]

This thread violates the unofficial board rules.

 

[STDiva]

My pet peeve is with those members who complain that a link contains images which are not "click-able" - that is, the images cannot be enlarged.

Why does that bother some members ?

Because they're spoiled cunts who don't appreciate the effort other people put into finding and posting links. They'll complain but won't post any of their own. Fuck em. Their mothers wear army boots.

 

[Ravenholm]

The use of the search engine before posting incase of a duplicate thread.

Some people bitch and moan about people not using it. Like it should be a rule to use it first before posting. BUT once they do this and bring up an old thread from a year or two years back (or further back). These same muppets start fucking bitching again that old threads are being used by these people. It's like "why are you posting in a three year old thread man?!". MAKE YOUR CUNTING BASTARD MINDS UP!. It's either use the search bar and find the old thread and use it or create a new one with the same topic (or a similar topic). It's one or the other NOT BOTH!.