I'm Encouraged....How About You?

[bobjustbob]

"At Will" gives a protection to the employer to cut their staff without due harm. If business is down 20% then what reason would there be to keep people? Decisons have to be made. Cut a senior person with experience at $16 hr or 2 less skilled at $8 hr. You can't afford to keep them all on. It's not a domocratic decision, it is a business decision. The state should not have a say which I choose.

 

[mikexmoran]

It isn't the employees fault you chose to give him more money. People aren't raw resources. I understand the economics. To simply use that argument is a crutch.

 

[Mayhem]

Hey, I'm still encouraged....how about you?

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

Actually, to buck the trend going on in this thread, I am rather encouraged. Mittens isn't exactly a full blown conservative, so what is you libs' problem with him?

Is your problem with him that, though he's not 100% conservative, is that he isn't 100% liberal either?

Is you all's problem with him that he's rich? So's Obama, and the guy in the video above comes from a pretty well to do rich ****** and he was okay in you all's book.

Is your problem with him that he "outsourced" jobs? Obama sent taxpayer money abroad for stuff like solar panels from Mexico, delivery trucks from Great Britan, and don't forget the Fisker from Finland.

Is your problem with him that his company, Bain Capital, couldn't keep ALL business open? One word: Solyndra...

Is your problem with Mittens that "he's got all the contribution money", that the "fat cat" donors are giving him all the money? Don't forget!! Back in 2008 those same "fat cat" donors gave all the money to Obama, and not a peep was heard from the media in a negative way, but now that the shoe's in the other foot, the media (and from what I've read, some here) is all bitching and moaning that "the rich are all for Romney". Obama OWNED Wall Street back in 2008 but now those same Wall Street guys are having buyer's remorse.

And Ryan, throwing grandma off the cliff. You guys seem to easy to *********. Let the media paint the GOP candidate in a certain way and you guys complety fall for it. Like Palin and Bush, they're so stupid because Saturday Night Live says so, same thing with Ryan, he's so mean and wants to **** old people because TV says so (never mind that it was a Democrat paid ad). Now, am I saying that the media don't vet either of these GOP guys? No, but they should have vetted Obama back in 2008.

Mittens wasn't my first choice, but, heck, we got a MA Republican and with MA being mostly Democrat, hopefully he'll at least make the election more competitive in his own state than, say a Texas Republican, would have made it, though I'm don't expect him to win there anyway. But generally speaking, this election is his to loose and I am completely sure that the media will do whatever it takes to help him loose it by magnifying any little mistake he makes and ignoring or diminishing any mistakes, whether big or small, that Obama may make.

The problem is as a corporate criminal he will not hesitate to **** a pillage the American people and now he's elected a confused Asshat to be VP???? You really want this confused fool making important decisions??? He can't even run an election worth a ****. Just elect a democratic congress and a democratic president so when that wretch Scalia finally drops we can put a true American in office who doesn't push the outrageous thought that corporations are people. WYF?!?