If babies had guns...Really? REALLY????!?!?!

I recognise that there are differing perspectives on abortion.

I recognise that there are differing perspectives on gun control.

I welcome the debate, the discussion, and I think that through civil, reasoned discussion we can all learn from one another. I'm for the debate. When the discussion stops, freedoms disappear.

However, when your argument looks like this, I'm done with you. Not because we have a disagreement about gun control or about abortion, but because you're just plain stupid.

Thoughts?

babies.jpg
 
You pretty much said it already. It's pretty bad that people can be so cavalier about their insistence on what is essentially medical fascism ("your body is mine to dictate") that they can take such a flippant approach and still believe themselves to be coming from a moral high ground.
 
Babies don't get aborted, fetuses do. A fetus can't work a gun. Too small, not enough manual dexterity.

Regardless, the pro-gun advocates have already stated that arming blacks would have prevented slavery. Oh, and also that arming students would prevent school shootings.

The message is clear; Problems only ever exist due to a lack of firepower. More guns? Fewer problems. Always.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
Babies don't get aborted, fetuses do. A fetus can't work a gun. Too small, not enough manual dexterity.

Regardless, the pro-gun advocates have already stated that arming blacks would have prevented slavery. Oh, and also that arming students would prevent school shootings.

The message is clear; Problems only ever exist due to a lack of firepower. More guns? Fewer problems. Always.

Fetuses don't get aborted, embryos do. (at least in Canada anyways, only legal abortion is 12 weeks and under, where its not technically or legally a fetus yet) And embryos are even more useless when handling a gun because embryos are like, the size of a walnut or smaller.
 
I recognise that there are differing perspectives on abortion.

I recognise that there are differing perspectives on gun control.

I welcome the debate, the discussion, and I think that through civil, reasoned discussion we can all learn from one another. I'm for the debate. When the discussion stops, freedoms disappear.

However, when your argument looks like this, I'm done with you. Not because we have a disagreement about gun control or about abortion, but because you're just plain stupid.

Thoughts?

View attachment 278743

You pretty much said it already. It's pretty bad that people can be so cavalier about their insistence on what is essentially medical fascism ("your body is mine to dictate") that they can take such a flippant approach and still believe themselves to be coming from a moral high ground.

Babies don't get aborted, fetuses do. A fetus can't work a gun. Too small, not enough manual dexterity.

Regardless, the pro-gun advocates have already stated that arming blacks would have prevented slavery. Oh, and also that arming students would prevent school shootings.

The message is clear; Problems only ever exist due to a lack of firepower. More guns? Fewer problems. Always.

blah, blah, blah, so tired of these dumb fucking gun threads.....

 
Putting reality aside for a moment, how about having a loaded gun inside a woman's uterus with a baby that could work it? Idea situation, right? Mother dies if the gun is shot, so does the baby.

Clearly thought through. Just so stupid it is hard to believe.
 
Putting reality aside for a moment, how about having a loaded gun inside a woman's uterus with a baby that could work it? Idea situation, right? Mother dies if the gun is shot, so does the baby.

Clearly thought through. Just so stupid it is hard to believe.

Are you sure the idea isn't that... uh, somehow the fetus is going to shoot the doctor performing the abortion? I mean, it would be tough to get a clear shot, but if firing out of the vagina... it's a maybe. Well, I mean, you know... if you don't have a working knowledge of biology and aren't aware of the amniotic sac or the mucus plug protecting the uterus...
 
Are you sure the idea isn't that... uh, somehow the fetus is going to shoot the doctor performing the abortion? I mean, it would be tough to get a clear shot, but if firing out of the vagina... it's a maybe. Well, I mean, you know... if you don't have a working knowledge of biology and aren't aware of the amniotic sac or the mucus plug protecting the uterus...

I suppose if you believe that women can shut down the process of conception during rape, you might be stupid enough to come up with what you're suggesting.

Somehow, that's not as far fetched for some as it should be.
 
I suppose if you believe that women can shut down the process of conception during rape, you might be stupid enough to come up with what you're suggesting.

Somehow, that's not as far fetched for some as it should be.

Well it's important to have a working knowledge of what you're dealing with...

"When a physician removes a child from a woman, that is the largest organ in a body. That's a big thing. That's a big surgery. You don't have any other organs in your body that are bigger than that."

- Alabama State Chairman, Mary Sue McClurkin (R)
 
Fetuses don't get aborted, embryos do. (at least in Canada anyways, only legal abortion is 12 weeks and under, where its not technically or legally a fetus yet) And embryos are even more useless when handling a gun because embryos are like, the size of a walnut or smaller.

Hmm, somehow I missed this.

This is generally true. Most abortions take place at the embryo stage. There are later abortions performed both in the US and Canada though. Canada actually has (or at least had, don't know about current figures) about 10% of abortions as late term. Generally these are done in scenarios where the mother's life is in danger, or there are other issues.
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
I suppose if you believe that women can shut down the process of conception during rape, you might be stupid enough to come up with what you're suggesting.

Somehow, that's not as far fetched for some as it should be.

Actually, if the woman had a gun during rape, she could shut down the process of rape...but I do agree, it's a pretty fucked up premise to suggest that Jr.'s packin heat in the womb, even from someone as pro gun as myself.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Ladies...Gentlemen...Babies with guns? Fetuses with guns? Embryos with guns? All of this can be addressed at a later, dare I say, more appropriate time. But for now, can we stick with what's important? I'm speaking of course, of Sharks With Frikkin' Laser Beams Attached To Their Heads!



Carry on.
 
Ladies...Gentlemen...Babies with guns? Fetuses with guns? Embryos with guns? All of this can be addressed at a later, dare I say, more appropriate time. But for now, can we stick with what's important? I'm speaking of course, of Sharks With Frikkin' Laser Beams Attached To Their Heads!

Well, by the popularity of Shark Week we can all safely surmise that people love sharks and would like to see them better protected for their own good. Thus, logically, giving them all lasers could only make the world a better place. :yesyes:
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
And just where are these babies supposed to get these guns? I suppose the representative has a plan for that, too, jobs for babies in the womb. The lunacy is strong with this guy. :rolleyes:
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
Guys like this feel really strongly about babies....until they're born and their parebts need help paying for them.
 

GodsEmbryo

Closed Account

*sigh* Babies would have no idea of the concept 'gun' in the first place, let alone what it's for and what to do with it. That knowledge and awareness comes with age, together with the 'morale' (for lack of a better word) of it's use. Same goes for the concept 'abortion'. I'm not going into an endless debate of pro or contra guns or abortion. Every human should develop his own morale and respect the others opinions and believes (if these are within reasonable boundaries), and not shove it down someone's throat because it's different. But it this case it's just another ridiculous and meaningless campaign slogan that proves stupidity instead of reasoning. Once again another fail for mankind.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
Hmm, somehow I missed this.

This is generally true. Most abortions take place at the embryo stage. There are later abortions performed both in the US and Canada though. Canada actually has (or at least had, don't know about current figures) about 10% of abortions as late term. Generally these are done in scenarios where the mother's life is in danger, or there are other issues.

Legal late-term abortions here in Canada are only granted if the mothers life is in danger, or if there are serious health issues for the baby. Legally, though, abortions can only be given here up until the 12 week mark.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
So..........how about that cocksucker in Philadelphia murdering babies and calling it abortion? Just tossing it out there. That's about all I have to say except maybe we should start jamming snub nosed .38s up a few uteruses....uteri? That red squiggly thing tells me that it is indeed uteri. Educating the low information crowd is definitely not the answer. Condoms distributed at schools doesn't seem to be doing the trick, either. Fuck it, we should petition the White House to start drone strikes on every public high school in 'Murica. Retroactive abortions across the boards. Now if some ballsy politician were to run on that platform I would proudly endorse him/her.
 
Top