I see someone doesn't understand what an example used to illustrate a point is.
And altho you have indeed said you don't drink and drive you've also stated many times you think drinking and driving isn't that dangerous even tho there are plenty of tests to show otherwise so it could happen.
I see someone doesn't understand that a reasonable example requires some reasonable likelihood of happening.
"tests"? Do you know what "tests" I go by on this subject?? The ones that have practically demonstrated mere amounts of alcohol having minimal effects on the ability to perform a task like driving to the degree that it's virtually inconsequential.
Do mere amounts have an effect?? Yes!! No different than mere amounts of alcohol having an effect on one's ability to perform a task like writing their name. But will mere amounts cause a person to inadvertently substitute letters in their name for incorrect ones or write it so illegibly as not to be recognizable? Most likely not. In other words, even though they are affected...it still has little bearing on their ability to adequately perform that task.
I said, mere amounts of alcohol has an effect that is virtually inconsequential when it comes to adequately performing a task like (normal) driving.
THAT IS BACKED UP by the fact that people do it on the magnitude of some exponential amount of times which don't result in accident as compared to when it is the cause. EVEN WHEN accidents do occur and they are attributable to alcohol the numbers are comparatively low. That is despite those numbers being loaded with incidents where alcohol clearly had no causal relationship to the accident but merely a person involved had alcohol in their system. I mean, pretty soon they'll labeling accidents which happen in front of liquor stores as alcohol related.
The number of times people drink, drive then cause accidents is more than likely less than 1 percent. Does that mean anything to you in this discussion?
There are some in this thread who have claimed that when they drink they do so in small amounts and when they drive they drive more conscientiously because of it. I think you lambasted them for being delusional. Setting aside for a moment that the suggestion is utterly reasonable, practical and possible...how would you even be in a position to refute such a claim?? I'm under the assumption you have little to no experience with doing it, so from where would your perspective be derived? I don't do it but I've done it. I know that mere amounts of alcohol don't cause a person to mistake a green light for a red light, or not look both ways before proceeding, or prevent you from turning a steering wheel or keeping a car in a straight line, etc.
If it did, fuck drinking then driving....I would be against people even drinking then go out walking.