i need help id'ing these hos
- Thread starter nicksinif
- Start date
Hmmm.....We do have OCSM here and how do you think they are going to feel looking at the title of your thread. We are honoured to have them here and posting with their insight and answering our questions. Just because this is a porn board, doesn't mean all respect of others goes out the window!. After all they are just doing a job like everyone else. Except their's brings pleasure to millions to us.
Not to stir up trouble but...
While I don't agree with calling women "hos" simply because I don't like the term, we are talking about porn stars here gentlemen. Video taped prostitutes, to which their respective governments are their pimp (as they take a cut in the form of taxes to keep it nice and legal.) And many of them are paid to call themselves all sorts of garbage in their videos. Many of them enjoy it. Many others still pretend to enjoy it, but just wait until the cameras are off to cry.
It's somewhat hypocritical to enjoy what they do while chastizing them for doing it, but let's face it guys, they are what they are. It's not a respectable job, it's the world's oldest profession, which brings as much displeasure as it does pleasure.
It just strikes me as comical that anyone would sit here on a porn forum, and say "How dare you call these women loose, or promiscuous!" While then referring to their "body of work" in such films as "Trailer Trash Gutter Sluts" "Cum Filled Holes." "Hos Need Black Cum" "Teach My Slut Ass" and so on.
While I don't agree with calling women "hos" simply because I don't like the term, we are talking about porn stars here gentlemen. Video taped prostitutes, to which their respective governments are their pimp (as they take a cut in the form of taxes to keep it nice and legal.) And many of them are paid to call themselves all sorts of garbage in their videos. Many of them enjoy it. Many others still pretend to enjoy it, but just wait until the cameras are off to cry.
It's somewhat hypocritical to enjoy what they do while chastizing them for doing it, but let's face it guys, they are what they are. It's not a respectable job, it's the world's oldest profession, which brings as much displeasure as it does pleasure.
It just strikes me as comical that anyone would sit here on a porn forum, and say "How dare you call these women loose, or promiscuous!" While then referring to their "body of work" in such films as "Trailer Trash Gutter Sluts" "Cum Filled Holes." "Hos Need Black Cum" "Teach My Slut Ass" and so on.
AkaRai said:
According to who? The church??? If there's one thing that DOESN'T deserve respect, it's organised religion (they're the ones who put a ban on such stuff & TRIED to make it look bad in the first place)!
You might disagree with me, but then I ask you what makes porn & prostitution disrespectable. Before you answer, I'd like to remind you that the body is just flesh, while the mind is that which deserves respect!
If you still disagree with me, I'd like to remind you, that by WATCHING this stuff & thus giving these people a market to operate on, you're 'much worse' (I don't believe in this myself, since I don't believe either profession is disrespectable) than them. (in other words, you're being a hypocrite)
I also disapprove of the use of the word ho when talking about prostitutes, since in MY eyes, it IS a respectable job, just like any other.
Gordar said:
First off let me say, I'm an Atheist, and you should seriously keep your mouth shut if you're going to spout ignorance like that, because you make us look bad. Generalizing all of religion because you don't agree with rules most of them agree on, that are also agreed upon by those outside of the religion? Seriously ***, research what you're spouting. By generalizing, and stereotyping them, you become them. You discredit those of use who genuinely disbelieve in religion for scientific reasons, with your choosing not to believe in it simply to vindicate your lack of morality. You don't need an omnipotant imaginary friend to know right from wrong. Seriously man, you're a major discredit to atheists like myself.
Would you want your ******** selling her body on the streets? Prostitution is a bad thing because it devalues your genetic material, that 1. You're lazy enough to try to sell sex, and 2. low to the point that you can't get sex for free, and have to pay for it, genetically devaluing yourself.
It's sex without love, without even lust really. Turns something as beautiful as sex, into no more than a business exchange. No more pure than buying a ***** for the day, or paying someone to go out with you.
In short, your internet tough guy act isn't going to get you anywhere. Defending whores (look it up in the dictionary. The exchange of money for sex = whore. I'll get a link if I have to.) isn't going to get them to think you're more sensitive, or make them want to ***** with you, and if you're willing to pay for sex, you're a truly sad individual.
Am I a hypocrite? Well if you read my original post, instead of just spouting off unrelatedly about religion for no apparent reason, yes. It is a bit hypocritical to enjoy the fruits of something immoral. That's why it's called a "guilty pleasure" though. Revel in the wrongness. On top of that, it's not really a direct hypocrisy unless you're also doing pornography yourself. Personally, I see it as a form of acting, because with precious few exceptions, most porn is not real sex, but just women trying their darndest to look like they enjoy what they're doing, and faking orgasms. I find them physically gorgeous. Would I actually have sex with them given the chance in real life? No. It's the same way you can watch and enjoy an action film where the main character ***** hundreds of people, without actually condoning mass ****** in real life. It's fantasy. They're called porn actresses for a reason kiddo.
That said, rather than nitpicking about the ***'s poor choice in words, can't we just continue enjoying our guilty pleasures, and find out who girls in the pictures are?
Last edited:
I think the middle two pics are Katie Morgan, not Kaitlyn Ashley.
no, i mean hos. sort of like ur mum? remember her?
katie morgan is correct. :glugglug:
the other one, i don't think it's nikki fritz. even if it's a pre-silicone shoot.
