Hustler fined $14K for not using condoms in porn

[knowone]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110331/ap_en_mo/us_porn_industry_condoms

 

[squallumz]

too lazy to read the article but i gotta give it up to flint. i really hope they dont start using them. i hate seeing condoms in porn.

 

[Will E Worm]

There's no law for this. Who cares if there is one?

Just move out of California.

More regulations will not fix anything.

 

[knowone]

I think it's going to get kicked out of court. Cal OSHA can't get a specific law passed so they aren't stretching the intent of an existing law. Are they going to try to apply it to married couples who who film their sex life? What about pornstars who are just living together? This has got 1st amendment rights and years through the court system written all over it.

 

[rizwano]

absurd law.

 

[abejarano12]

This a law that just can't be enforced. It should up to the stars if they want to use a condom. Plain and simple get rid of it

 

[prof_porn]

Actually safety is paramount.

 

[izabelplayer]

i didn't know there was such a law.

 

[bhangraised]

haha damn

 

[Raptor3831]

thats just a stupid law haha

 

[Tittyman5000]

$14,000 for not wearing condom's? I wonder how much does it cost Hustler to run tests for STD's?

 

[mastergarcia]

remember what pope said in Africa?

"Do not use condoms"

lmao

 

[GregCentauro]

Actually safety is paramount.

Not to me. I'm a 20th century fox.

 

[mastergarcia]

if they make condoms must, there wont be any ATM scenes... that sucks

 

[D-rock]

Actually safety is paramount.

If that was true then they should immediately ban all sports or organized recreational business activities that have great potential for harm like professional football, hockey, boxing, MMA, and racecar driving or institute dramatic and heavily increased number of rules and measures to make them safe. (While also destroying their ability to function in the first place without making a mockery of what they were.) They would also have to ban dangerous professions involved in entertainment that have great risk of bodily harm for no other purpose to society other than entertainment, like stuntmen for movies, unless they also had restrictions on the making of movies that would normally require stuntmen to do a lot of dangerous acts and make that impossible. Of course that would be stupid and every body would think it was ridiculous, but if they aren't willing to do that then OSHA is just being both hypocritical and totally arbitrary about truly and fairly caring about safety in the workplace. It would be one of those things people would find stupid if it wasn't a subject that involved a taboo subject like porn. In fact I would reason that compared to all of the other things I listed above porn is probably much safer than them.

 

[PamCarmen69]

$14,000 for not wearing condom's? I wonder how much does it cost Hustler to run tests for STD's?

Performers pay for their own STD testing.

 

[Danglyparts]

another example of when the government sees massive amounts of money being made, and has to "legally" stick their hand in there for no reason

 

[analpornlover]

In my opinion porn is a "no condom zone". So it would be very bad if they are going to use condoms in porn in the future. I don't wanna see a gloved dick fucking a pussy or asshole. It should be a naked dick.