House defeats $700B financial markets bailout

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080929/ap_on_bi_ge/financial_meltdown

WASHINGTON - In a stunning vote that shocked the capital and worldwide markets, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, ignoring urgent warnings from President Bush and congressional leaders of both parties that the economy could nosedive without it.

Stocks plummeted on Wall Street even before the 228-205 vote to reject the bill was officially announced on the House floor.

As a digital screen in the House chamber recorded a cascade of "no" votes against the bailout, Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley of New York shouted news of the falling Dow Jones industrials. "Six hundred points!" he yelled, jabbing his thumb downward. The decline was about 530 points shortly before the close of the trading day.

Bush and a host of leading congressional figures had implored the lawmakers to pass the legislation despite howls of protest from their constituents back home. Not enough members were willing to take the political risk just five weeks before an election.

"No" votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill.

The overriding question for congressional leaders was what to do next. Congress has been trying to adjourn so that its members can go out and campaign. "We are ready to continue to work on this," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

"The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat.

"What happened today cannot stand," Pelosi said. "We must move forward, and I hope that the markets will take that message."

At the White House, Bush said, "I'm disappointed in the vote by the United Sates Congress on the economic recovery plan."

The president was to meet with members of his economic team later in the day "to determine next steps," said spokesman Tony Fratto.

Republicans blamed Pelosi's scathing speech near the close of the debate — which attacked Bush's economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets — for the vote's failure.

"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Minority Leader John Boehner said. Pelosi's words, the Ohio Republican said, "poisoned our conference, caused a number of members that we thought we could get, to go south."

Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi's speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.

Frank said that was a remarkable accusation by Republicans against Republicans: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decided to punish the country."

Monday's action had been preceded by unusually aggressive White House lobbying, and Fratto said that Bush had been making calls to lawmakers until shortly before the vote.

Bush and his economic advisers, as well as congressional leaders in both parties had argued the plan was vital to insulating ordinary Americans from the effects of Wall Street's bad bets. The version that was up for vote Monday was the product of marathon closed-door negotiations on Capitol Hill over the weekend.

"We're all worried about losing our jobs," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. "Most of us say, 'I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it — not me.' "

With their dire warnings of impending economic doom and their sweeping request for unprecedented sums of money and authority to bail out cash-starved financial firms, Bush and his economic chiefs have focused the attention of world markets on Congress, Ryan added.

"We're in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us," he said.

The legislation the administration promoted would have allowed the government to buy bad mortgages and other rotten assets held by troubled banks and financial institutions. Getting those debts off their books should bolster those companies' balance sheets, making them more inclined to lend and easing one of the biggest choke points in the credit crisis. If the plan worked, the thinking went, it would help lift a major weight off the national economy that is already sputtering.

More than a repudiation of Democrats, Frank said, Republicans' refusal to vote for the bailout was a rejection of their own president."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080929/ap_on_bi_st_ma_re/wall_street;_ylt=AqAs_1yEHI1b7Xq6H5pJb_VI2ocA

Stocks tumble as bailout plan fails in House
NEW YORK - Wall Street has ended a stunning session with a huge loss, with the Dow Jones industrials plunging more than 660 points after the failure of the financial bailout plan in the House.

Stunned traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange watched on TV screens as the House voted down the plan. And they saw stock prices tumbling on their monitors.

The plan's failure means no one knows how the financial sector hobbled by hundreds of billions of dollars in bad mortgage bets will recover. The credit markets remain close to frozen as banks are too afraid to lend — including loans to to other banks.

The Dow is down about 667 points at the 10,475 level."





I had posted something on this in another thread but it is so important it deserves its own.
This decline in the stock market is the single biggest points decline in history.
And this defeat of the bill in the house is almost entirely the american peoples fault.They have overwhelmingly been telling their members of congress that are against it.40 something days before an election you can hardly expect politicians to do things even if they are vital to the interests of the nation in opposition to the masses.I despise wall street and corporate types I bet almost as much as anyone but we are going to all be very sorry later if due to not wanting to bail out wall street we let the economy collapse which is where were now seemingly headed.People all over the world will lose jobs ,wealth etc. if this is not done.The great depression will not be just something you read in a book or saw in TV documentary,it will be your every day life.And trust me it won't be a life most enjoy or possibly even survive.
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
And the DOW drops 770 points. Start hoarding pork and beans. :eek:
 

Torre82

Moderator \ Jannie
Staff member
One step of many in the right direction. We're not starting back at zero - a clean slate - equilibrium... but I think it's rather nice to weaken the corporations a little further. Maybe this time around they'll care more about the consumer.. since we line their fuggin' pockets. :p

Call me an anarchist.. but if they dont wanna play ball, screw 'em. They can die like the dodo. We're all going to edge a little bit closer to reality with this. Harsh.. expensive reality. A generation of millions suddenly saying.. "Oh fuck.. I have an SUV.. what was I thinking?"
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
I have only one word:

Shit.
 
I'm still not convinced doing nothing isn't an option. This bailout language has got to stop, it will go into a never ending cycle which is why Bernake and Paulsen wanted no restraints on the bill.
 
I'm still not convinced doing nothing isn't an option. This bailout language has got to stop, it will go into a never ending cycle which is why Bernake and Paulsen wanted no restraints on the bill.

I'm convinced doing nothing will mean huge decline in stock market and economy and a depression.
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...

Torre82

Moderator \ Jannie
Staff member
I'm convinced doing nothing will mean huge decline in stock market and economy and a depression.

And.. the possibility of China buying up absolutely everything, integrating itself into the American persona foreverafter? They've got sheer numbers, a growing economy and what're we gonna do? Launch the nukes? I mean.. possibly, but..

Eh, this whole situation fuckin' reeks. You think a few months to a year from now we'll still be on our broadband connections, talking to each other on here? :shrug:
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
And.. the possibility of China buying up absolutely everything, integrating itself into the American persona foreverafter? They've got sheer numbers, a growing economy and what're we gonna do? Launch the nukes? I mean.. possibly, but...

Well, it worked in the thirties...
 
You want people to have wealth ? :confused: ;)


Bailout is not indicative of free mkt.


Yes I want people to have wealth.People 401ks may just be worth nothing as an example.I am all for wealth especially when it's fairly distributed!:)

But your right a bailout is not lessie faire free market capiltalism.I think its clear that kind of unbridled,unregulated economic system is not up to the demands of modern times.
 
You know, there's a part of me that wonders whether this legislation might be exactly what this country needs simply because it is so distasteful to both parties. I can't remember the last time both parties worked so hard to pass a piece of legislation that they both hated so much, and all because it doesn't serve their own party's personal interests.
 

Facetious

Moderated
^ ^ * "fairly distributed"
I knew that there was more to it than meets the eye. ;)



^ Whenever members of the two opposing parties are in unison, the people get the shaft. :yesyes: :helpme:
 
If we're lucky maybe this will be a blessing in disguise. Fundamental flaws with our whole economic system have been slowly destroying us and eroding our society for decades now. Maybe what needs to happen is for it to get so bad that there is no possible way anybody can deny it any longer so that we will be forced to finally do something to fix what has been broken and finally make a moral, ethical, economic system that is fair to everybody. If the phoenix that rises from the ashes is stronger than the one that proceeded it maybe it will work out for the best.

Of course if we're not lucky...then there's a chance we could be screwed.
 
I've been in and out all morning but the CNBC anchors sound optimistic about doing nothing which is what they feel will happen if the bill isn't signed.
 
Pelosi's big mouth, someone should stick their dick in it.

Anyways are there any shoes still made with leather soles?
 
Like the boy who cried wolf.

Part of what puts me on alert about this, is it's the same administration telling everyone this is an emergency that can't wait, that also told everyone, they didn't get it, the economy is fine. How long ago was that? A year? It's also the same administration that went into full alert with emergency multi year contracts and military strikes for the invasion of Iraq which we know was also their own fabrication. Maybe they couldnt' wait, but it looks like the rest of us could have.
 
Top