HELP ID this massive rack!!

Doug Warmer said:
I don't agree Mr Hustler sir. I looked at his online portfolio & found very few photoshopped pics.
Click to expand...

I did too, Doug. 100 pages worth, and I found a whole bunch. Granted he's very good at, but it's still quite obvious in many cases. One of the most obvious is this photo, which has made the rounds of the ID section in a few different threads Premium Link Upgrade

If you look at her right breast you can absolutely tell it's been shopped. You never see a natural breast of that size and configuration in the real world, but it's a very common configuration for breast morphs. Note particularly the angle of the undercurve. Also note how the picture is fairly crisp and well defined from her collar bone up, but is fuzzier below it. In a situation like this that's always a dead giveaway the pic has been shopped. He posted this pic 3 times in his portfolio, but posted conflicting dates for when the pic was taken; another red flag, imo.

You might also note that the breasts in that pic are very similar to the breasts in post #1 above. The shop job above was more skillfully done, but the concept is almost identical.

But despite all that, I do agree with everybody on this thread that it's a very sexy picture.
 
pool_hustler said:
I did too, Doug. 100 pages worth, and I found a whole bunch. Granted he's very good at, but it's still quite obvious in many cases. One of the most obvious is this photo, which has made the rounds of the ID section in a few different threads Premium Link Upgrade

If you look at her right breast you can absolutely tell it's been shopped. You never see a natural breast of that size and configuration in the real world, but it's a very common configuration for breast morphs. Note particularly the angle of the undercurve. Also note how the picture is fairly crisp and well defined from her collar bone up, but is fuzzier below it. In a situation like this that's always a dead giveaway the pic has been shopped. He posted this pic 3 times in his portfolio, but posted conflicting dates for when the pic was taken; another red flag, imo.

You might also note that the breasts in that pic are very similar to the breasts in post #1 above. The shop job above was more skillfully done, but the concept is almost identical.

But despite all that, I do agree with everybody on this thread that it's a very sexy picture.
Click to expand...

That is a real photo. The girl is russian and I remember seeing a couple videos of her squeezing milk out of those beautiful massive breasts.

Dowson has some great skills with the women. He has also worked with this Russian girl named "Kate".
Premium Link Upgrade

What lead me to this thread was this web page.
Premium Link Upgrade
There you will find a few more of his works.
The first girl is very attactive. There are a couple more of here down the page.

Any ID's on the first girl or the OP's girl would be great.
 
Last edited:
pool_hustler said:
I did too, Doug. 100 pages worth, and I found a whole bunch. Granted he's very good at, but it's still quite obvious in many cases. One of the most obvious is this photo, which has made the rounds of the ID section in a few different threads Premium Link Upgrade

If you look at her right breast you can absolutely tell it's been shopped. You never see a natural breast of that size and configuration in the real world, but it's a very common configuration for breast morphs. Note particularly the angle of the undercurve. Also note how the picture is fairly crisp and well defined from her collar bone up, but is fuzzier below it. In a situation like this that's always a dead giveaway the pic has been shopped. He posted this pic 3 times in his portfolio, but posted conflicting dates for when the pic was taken; another red flag, imo.

You might also note that the breasts in that pic are very similar to the breasts in post #1 above. The shop job above was more skillfully done, but the concept is almost identical.

But despite all that, I do agree with everybody on this thread that it's a very sexy picture.
Click to expand...


There is also this Q&A from his tumblr site.

annibalcomfort asked: Do you retouch your pictures in Photoshop or a similar program? And if so, what kind of retouching do you do? Do you do it yourself? Sorry if the question has already been asked! Anyway, great work!

I ‘retouch’ only if it is absolutely necessary..but i am lazy and can’t even be bothered to remove the dust spots..i try to clean skin a little, take away spots etc..but i prefer the photographs to be in their original state if it is possible.

I am gonna give him the benefit of the doubt. I feel they are real pics and don't have that shopped feel to me.
 
To me that Pic in Post #1 is not Photoshopped, but I think it was run thru Lightroom most likely #2, not #3 as a batch for correctness. I see he has a Fetish for the same "Blue Dress" & the "Same Room & Window", and he takes a lot of his Pics in the same Pose. The Blue Dress & Walls & Floor & Skin Tones & Hair Highlights, "Colors" seem to be "Tweaked" about the same amount, suggesting Lightroom 2 to me. I Downloaded and enlarged Post #1 Pic and on a 30" Monitor I don't see any "Cutting", "Layering", etc, and the right breast of hers could have been enlarged in Photoshop CS5, but nothing shows on my Metadata from Download on 10-9-2011. Could someone who Download the Pic when it was first Posted Please check there Metadata? That would clear things up really quick!! Danged Nice Rack & Gal!! ;) Just My Thoughts :2 cents: Later!! :glugglug:
 
After I went offline the other night after posting above, was doing some downloading into Lightroom3. I have my presets, things was going good, GF comes in with a coffee, asks whats up, told her about my downloading going on and what I WAS going to do next. Then I told her about the Pic Posted on Freeones in question about being Photoshopped, and that the Gal in question had a big Rack. She wanted to see the Pic, soooo, after download was done, back to Freeones, she liked the Pic, she also thought NOT Photoshopped. She said one way to find out, try to repeat the Pic, I agreed, I went and got my Camera, she shucked her clothes, Shorts & Ty-Top & Panties. Found out the Lense has to be about Belly-Button in height, slight upward shot. Then I did something I VERY VERY Rarely do, I went from Manual to Auto. Low & Behold it locked right on her right nipple as closest object. I'm using a Canon EOS 5D MarkII. You can try this on your monitor, mine locked on her right nipple of Post #1 Pic. That explains a little of the Effect that I think some are taking as being Photoshopped. Next when I downloaded my GF's Pic's in my Lightroom3 with my Presets, Wow, I Got the same effect with her 38DD's staring at me. Then I went to Photoshop CS5, I wanted the "Curve" of the Bottom of the Breast as in Post #1 Pic. Third try was a charm, I used the "Wrap" feature just a little and it made a Real Sweet Curve to the bottom of her Breast, Yes she LIKED!! I LIKED!! But I now have a question nagging at me, why would he be shooting in Auto???:dunno: Unless he's just messing around at a get together, party, reunion etc. Thats the only time I use Auto, cause Model's Time, Client, Helpers, Props & People, Caterer, Building or Room etc. all equals MONEY!! I don't waste on Auto, and I shoot mostly tethered, that is my Camera has a cable attached to my Laptop. I shoot a Pic it's in Lightroom for the Client to see at once. I want to go wireless, but haven't saw one I really like yet. Anyway, hope I cleared up how that Post #1 Pic might have been taken, this is the best I can come up with!! Later All!! Take Care!! :glugglug:
 
Renegade1Oh said:
After I went offline the other night after posting above, was doing some downloading into Lightroom3. I have my presets, things was going good, GF comes in with a coffee, asks whats up, told her about my downloading going on and what I WAS going to do next. Then I told her about the Pic Posted on Freeones in question about being Photoshopped, and that the Gal in question had a big Rack. She wanted to see the Pic, soooo, after download was done, back to Freeones, she liked the Pic, she also thought NOT Photoshopped. She said one way to find out, try to repeat the Pic, I agreed, I went and got my Camera, she shucked her clothes, Shorts & Ty-Top & Panties. Found out the Lense has to be about Belly-Button in height, slight upward shot. Then I did something I VERY VERY Rarely do, I went from Manual to Auto. Low & Behold it locked right on her right nipple as closest object. I'm using a Canon EOS 5D MarkII. You can try this on your monitor, mine locked on her right nipple of Post #1 Pic. That explains a little of the Effect that I think some are taking as being Photoshopped. Next when I downloaded my GF's Pic's in my Lightroom3 with my Presets, Wow, I Got the same effect with her 38DD's staring at me. Then I went to Photoshop CS5, I wanted the "Curve" of the Bottom of the Breast as in Post #1 Pic. Third try was a charm, I used the "Wrap" feature just a little and it made a Real Sweet Curve to the bottom of her Breast, Yes she LIKED!! I LIKED!! But I now have a question nagging at me, why would he be shooting in Auto???:dunno: Unless he's just messing around at a get together, party, reunion etc. Thats the only time I use Auto, cause Model's Time, Client, Helpers, Props & People, Caterer, Building or Room etc. all equals MONEY!! I don't waste on Auto, and I shoot mostly tethered, that is my Camera has a cable attached to my Laptop. I shoot a Pic it's in Lightroom for the Client to see at once. I want to go wireless, but haven't saw one I really like yet. Anyway, hope I cleared up how that Post #1 Pic might have been taken, this is the best I can come up with!! Later All!! Take Care!! :glugglug:
Click to expand...

As I perused his tumblr page a while back I remember (though I cannot locate it again yet, its like a 100+ pages now) him commenting that these pics (the ones with the blue top) were done with a "inexpensive" camera. I will continue to look for the statement. Perhaps that would explain the "auto" setting?

zaga4
 
irishfan1988 said:
As I perused his tumblr page a while back I remember (though I cannot locate it again yet, its like a 100+ pages now) him commenting that these pics (the ones with the blue top) were done with a "inexpensive" camera. I will continue to look for the statement. Perhaps that would explain the "auto" setting?

zaga4
Click to expand...

Yes, the "Point & Shoot" cameras is basically just Auto-Shoot camera's for the first camera, just starting out people. That would help explain the look of that Post #1 Pic. Thanks irishfan1988 for the info!! Later!! :glugglug:
 
irishfan1988 said:
There is also this Q&A from his tumblr site.

annibalcomfort asked: Do you retouch your pictures in Photoshop or a similar program? And if so, what kind of retouching do you do? Do you do it yourself? Sorry if the question has already been asked! Anyway, great work!

I ‘retouch’ only if it is absolutely necessary..but i am lazy and can’t even be bothered to remove the dust spots..i try to clean skin a little, take away spots etc..but i prefer the photographs to be in their original state if it is possible.

I am gonna give him the benefit of the doubt. I feel they are real pics and don't have that shopped feel to me.
Click to expand...

This quote appears on page 31 of his tumblr page. Of course, the page number will go higher as he adds posts. Here is the link for page 31.

Premium Link Upgrade

The name of the model in question is Yawen, and she is from England.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Solved
Scene or Girl? Redhead and brunette with 2 black dudes
Replies
2
Views
491
blackeyed
B
S
  • Solved
id hot busty girl
Replies
1
Views
372
Connor Macleod
Connor Macleod
A
  • Question Question
Who is she
Replies
4
Views
298
Andrewildlife
A
fire horse
[NEEDS ID] Pls ID this Lesbian with cool tattoos on her stomach
Replies
2
Views
855
fire horse
fire horse
M
[NEEDS ID] Need ID on hot asian possibly hispanic
Replies
2
Views
2K
mgomes
M
Back
Top