Has PornstarsPunishment gone too far?

[titsrock]

I just clicked on a link off of Freeones's main page because I was unaware of that this site existed. I clicked on a preview of a scene between James Dean and Dylan Riley. I am aware that James Dean is one of the "rougher" male performers, and sometime I click on his shit and other times I don't. I guess it depends on my mood.

However...I did click on a preview for this scene, and I thought it went too far, both in fantasy setup and in the sex. I label this fantasy rape and it was gross, to me.

http://tour.pornstarspunishment.com/tour3/scene/4347/Dylan-Riley

Does anyone think this scene and this site, specifically, crosses the line? Is normalizing "fantasy rape" the last frontier for porn?

 

[Will E Worm]

Has PornstarsPunishment gone too far?

No, it's just fine.

Everyone on the site is hired to be on the site.
If they didn't like it, they shouldn't have taken the money.

 

[Hot Mega]

Not my bag but clearly that doesn't cross the line IMO. That was a depiction of a chick getting fucked roughly, not rape IMO. If it depicted her resisting violently and scream no....that would be a rape depiction.

 

[titsrock]

WillE--wasn't that the argument that Max tried to *float* in court?

Mega--the girl clearly says, "Get off me, asshole" in that clip...:dunno:

 

[jack123]

Don't see anything wrong with it personally, theres far more extreme stuff out there.
Thanks for bringing the site to my attention though, I hadn't heard of it before you complained about it!

 

[Doc Scurlock]

The lesson here, don't steal tips from James Dean because he will fuck you up, literally.

But, yeah this isn't that extreme, if you've ever seen some of the stuff that comes out of Europe, namely Russia, then this is nothing.

 

[titsrock]

^
True but I don't think the mainstream/vanilla porn companies---Brazzers, BangBros, RealityKings--offer the extreme stuff. I always dismiss the extreme stuff as being produced in some shady east euro country with *questionable* actors...:dunno:

 

[ChefChiTown]

I don't think that preview showed anything (to me, anyway) that went "too far". I mean, they are paid actors and they're well aware of what they're going to be doing while they're on set. Now, I don't agree with the genre, or the fetish in general (I actually think that people who are into fantasy rape are fucking disgusting), but they're actors playing a part.

 

[Will E Worm]

WillE--wasn't that the argument that Max tried to *float* in court?

Mega--the girl clearly says, "Get off me, asshole" in that clip...:dunno:

Max didn't do anything wrong either.

It's called "reality" which means it is scripted.

All girls appearing on this website are 18 years or older. Records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.. By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material.

That was on Max's site as well. It's just another case of the government over-stepping their bounds.

True but I don't think the mainstream/vanilla porn companies---Brazzers, BangBros, RealityKings--offer the extreme stuff.

That's why most of their videos are horrible. Same videos, different day.

 

[Doc Scurlock]

^
True but I don't think the mainstream/vanilla porn companies---Brazzers, BangBros, RealityKings--offer the extreme stuff. I always dismiss the extreme stuff as being produced in some shady east euro country with *questionable* actors...:dunno:

I just think they're trying to fill a niche. Like a lot of these companies they've got their Milf site, Asian site, etc. now they're venturing into the extreme niche market.

 

[Kingfisher]

Geez, thank god I have a son...

 

[BlueBalls]

Have they gone too far? No I don't think so. The two actors have agreed to star and I'm sure most if not all of the actions were discussed prior to filming. There is far worse out there that I feel does go over the line which is still seen as "acceptable" and I don't think this crosses that line yet no matter how ugly I think it might be. I've never been a fan of this particular type of porn; I can't see the attraction to it. But then again it wasn't made for me. There's a certain demographic out there that enjoy this particular type of porn and this website is just pandering to their wants.

 

[Gordar]

No, it's just fine.

Everyone on the site is hired to be on the site.
If they didn't like it, they shouldn't have taken the money.

This is the lamest excuse I've ever heard...

If I ask you to come over to kick you in the gonads for $500.= dollars & you agree with this, but once you're here I cut off your balls & give you $1000.=, you wouldn't accept the money?

Anyway, back to the original topic. If the women agreed to the script & the actor(s) (the male ones) didn't do anything that wasn't in the script, then there's nothing wrong with it. If they did, he'll/they'll be facing a court sentence as soon as someone has the guts to sue him/them (rightfully so).

I always dismiss the extreme stuff as being produced in some shady east euro country with *questionable* actors...

The only East EU country known for it's questionable porn is Russia & you can usually see from a mile away that it's fake (luckily).

 

[Will E Worm]

This is the lamest excuse I've ever heard...

It's a great one.

If I ask you to come over to kick you in the gonads for $500.= dollars & you agree with this, but once you're here I cut off your balls & give you $1000.=, you wouldn't accept the money?

That isn't what we would have agreed on.

Anyway, back to the original topic. If the women agreed to the script & the actor(s) (the male ones) didn't do anything that wasn't in the script, then there's nothing wrong with it. If they did, he'll/they'll be facing a court sentence as soon as someone has the guts to sue him/them (rightfully so).

Something you should have done in the first place. :tongue:

Just like you just said, "If the woman agreed to the script".

Apparently she did and so did many others or she would be suing them and the site would be taken down.

 

[jasonk282]

No not gone to far at all. But here is an interesting question. When they are doing these "rape/forced" things, I would like to see the girl actually bite down on the dick. I asked my wife what she would do if she ever was in a perdictment like that. She said if a guy tried to rape/force me to suck his cock, I would just bit down with all my mite.

 

[Gordar]

That isn't what we would have agreed on.

I was talking about taking the money if a star didn't agree with it. If she didn't agree with it, she shouldn't have shown up, but if I were a star & I showed up (which I'd never do if I didn't agree with the script) & they went further than written in the script, I certainly wouldn't say keep the money....

So for your sentence to be correct it should have been like this :

No, it's just fine.

Everyone on the site is hired to be on the site.
If they didn't like it (the script), they shouldn't have shown up.

This is a big difference, because now you're truly talking about the original script instead of the actual sex you're implying in your initial post (which might have very little to do with the script).

 

[Will E Worm]

I was talking about taking the money if a star didn't agree with it. If she didn't agree with it, she shouldn't have shown up, but if I were a star & I showed up (which I'd never do if I didn't agree with the script) & they went further than written in the script, I certainly wouldn't say keep the money....

Like I said they do agree with the script or they would alert their agent and the site would be taken down.

It doesn't really matter to me any way. If someone doesn't like a site they can move on. The same with someone who works in the industry.

They can choose not to work with a site, company, or person.
It's as simple as that.

 

[Shadowfax 10]

No I don't think it went too far, as long as both the performers know what in the script and happy to do it, I think it ok, if one of them didn't like it, one of them would have buggered off.

 

[sporty_carr]

Mega--the girl clearly says, "Get off me, asshole" in that clip...:dunno:

I watched a pretty rough scene with Claire Dames and James Dean a while back. Before the scene ever started they told Claire what her "safe" word was. I'm guessing in this scene, "get off me, asshole" wasn't it or they would have stopped filming.

 

[Hot Mega]

I suppose t/r the dividing line is what would a reasonable person believed the scene depicted, rough, dominant/submissive sex (some chicks believe it or not are turned on by being dominated like that) or a rape?

I think the producers merely created just another rough sex scene depicting a chick being dominated.

Clearly the premise of the whole scene was punishment (via sex) for something the chick did that was "naughty" which plays into the whole dominate/submissive genre.

Without being a fan of that type of stuff that would just my uneducated take on it....:2 cents: