George Soros: Is He A Good Guy Or No?

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Anytime you hear about Soros, it's coming from spooge choked "conservatives" that can never really explain what horrible things Soros has done other than support liberal causes. It's still legal in this country to support and fund candidates, causes, and issues that you care about, even if they're not in line with conservative thought. Give an example, perhaps of what Soros is accused of? Pretty easy to debunk, I'm sure, if you look beyond Fox News, talk radio, and the "conservative" internet.

georges wasn't up to the task^ before, I don't know why he bothers bumping this thread now.
 
Hmm, it's above my pay grade to say which, if not both. :dunno: I've been aware of him for roughly thirty years and have read a fair amount him, as far as his involvement in the financial markets - his name came up in a Money & Banking class when I was getting my MBA (a few hundred years ago :D). IMO, he's not dissimilar from the Koch brothers, except that ideologically he's on the left instead of the right. Both are ultra-wealthy, market oriented influencers, who are strict globalists (their main similarity). Where they're somewhat dissimilar is that Soros leans more toward the left and centralized government structures, while at least one of the Koch brothers is an extreme libertarian. They could both be loosely described as "neocons/neolibs". Both are supporters of a New World Order type globalist world economy. Why? Because it greatly benefits them both. The Kochs are industrialists, so having global free trade makes their operations MUCH more profitable (i.e. being able to freely move labor to the most cost efficient location - they were great supporters of NAFTA). Soros, with his initial funding and ongoing ties to the Rothschild international banking family(s), basically crippled the Bank of England back in the 90s, with a rather ingenious forex play, which netted him roughly a billion dollars on one trade (really, short series of trades) over just a couple of days - and cost the Bank of England about $6 billion. The episode became known as "Black Wednesday" and changed the basic structure of the BofE's operations going forward. For those who have at least a rough understanding of commodity and/or currency trading, you'll understand the damage done by Soros - but he was "playing by the rules." So Soros benefits from open, cross-border financial market trading.

What I've always found humorous (if not sad) are the people who think that one or the other is "for them". It's like watching fat, slow chickens cheering for a fox over a wolf... not seeming to realize that both intend to eat them. Both Soros and the Kochs throw just enough chicken feed into the lot to keep the chickens happy, content and loyal. But most of all, they seek to keep them fat (and naive). :yesyes:

Great question, Dino. :hatsoff:


ETA: Can't rep ya, man. Owe ya some. 👍
Just read this. Best of the thread.
I originally thought this might be a trolling thread until I read this post.
Belated “well done”
 

gmase

Nattering Nabob of Negativism
I thought his commentary was self-evident and wholly unremarkable.
Dick is catching up since he didn't reply to it originally. Which proxy will be responding as this progresses?

As I commented earlier, I am not sure why Sheldon Adelson gets a free pass while Soros gets a bad rap.
 
I thought his commentary was self-evident and wholly unremarkable.
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my commentary.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
You're welcome. You sang his praises, I thought it was also-ran. I'm sure he appreciates your patronage.
 
Top