The truth is in the end opinion is pointless 1) because neither can be completely proven and 2) Even if 'free will' didn't exist the ILLUSION does (i.e. nobody knows what's going to happen tomorrow anyway, right?).
But still, for the sake of debate (and I LOVE a good debate) what's your opinions on this.
I no longer believe in 'free will'...too many things we don't decide that ultimately leads to influencing our decisions.
I must mention though, I DO NOT believe in the common definition of 'free will'...'free will' to me does NOT equal the ability to make choices. Computers can make choices and I think we all know computers don't have 'free will'.
'Free will' to me is the ability to make UNCAUSED choices (hence the "free" in 'free will')...I believe it is logically impossible to make uncaused choices.
But still, for the sake of debate (and I LOVE a good debate) what's your opinions on this.
I no longer believe in 'free will'...too many things we don't decide that ultimately leads to influencing our decisions.
I must mention though, I DO NOT believe in the common definition of 'free will'...'free will' to me does NOT equal the ability to make choices. Computers can make choices and I think we all know computers don't have 'free will'.
'Free will' to me is the ability to make UNCAUSED choices (hence the "free" in 'free will')...I believe it is logically impossible to make uncaused choices.
