Bought a new laptop and my trial version of Norton ends soon. Any good free anti virus software out there?
You want free? Get the latest version of "Security Essentials". Look at the reviews.If the reviews don't sell you than i don't know what to tell ya.You can't go wrong, I've never had a problem with my PC. EVER. And if you do pay for an A.V. program make sure it's not Norton. Norton is a virus in and of itself imo. Once you install it you can never fully un-install it. Fuck that.
Avast! It's free and one of the best anti virus softwares! Seriously. So DOA is wrong!
It's also easy to use. You can also use their internet security software. But that's not free.
I agree as well. I have been using Avast Home Free for over 7 years and never been infected. Also good to install and manually run a few things every once in a while to keep extra clean. I use free versions of Malwarebytes, SuperAntiSpyware, and Spybot Search and Destroy.
And only the F1 fans on the board will get that one anyway.If you're an F1 or Ferrari fan, you could always get Kaspersky's Premium Link Upgrade . I bet it'll make your computer go really fast. But if there's any sign that it's faster than Fernando Alonso's computer, you'll get an onscreen message saying, "Fernando's computer is faster than yours. Can you confirm you understand?" - and if you don't disable some of your RAM, your computer will just shut down. :stir: Yeah, I know![]()
I use Avast AND Spybot S&D. My computer is slow and ****, but I blame this on it being 5 years old & running vista. My spybot has stopped immunising and I did once get one program just slice thru both of them and infect my comp.
I have also been using it with a Mac OS X lion VM, but I think that is still beta.
What's your opinion of VirusBarrier X6 on the Mac OS? I'm running Lion right now.
Also, do you have an opinion on Mountain Lion vs. Lion? I tend to just stay with what works. Unless an OS upgrade is obviously better, faster or safer, I tend not to upgrade. That's one reason I still use XP SP3 on some older systems and under Parallels on the iMac. I use Win 7 at work and I don't care for it. For my needs, while old, XP does what I require of it. So what about Mountain Lion? Worth the risk of bugs or just a shiny toy without many advantages?
There are always bugs and even XP is still getting bug and security fixes. So don't let those reasons stop you from keeping your Mac on the latest OS version if it's supported.
Hard to imagine anyone's opinion of Lion vs Mountain Lion would matter to you if you prefer XP over Windows 7. While I use computers constantly for work and use Linux, Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, server 2003, Server 2008, and OS X of varying versions; I find Windows 7 to be much more effective for multitasking over XP. So while XP "gets the job done", I much prefer Windows 7 and my old systems with XP are only on XP because Windows 7 doesn't have drivers for those old systems.
And with that analogy, OS X Mountain Lion vs Lion could be viewed the same way. I actually use Mountain Lion and Lion virtual machines and both "get the job done" for me as well. And both are close enough that I recommend them both. As you would have to go back pretty far in OS X versions to be similar to comparing XP to Windows 7. And I think Windows 7 is a huge step up for Windows. I am still having a hard time feeling productive in Windows 8. It's a really nice OS for Touchscreens like Tablets. But on my dual screen test setup for Windows 8, it's hard to feel it's as "business" productive when compared to Windows 7.