EEOC sues trucking company for refusing to accommodate Muslim beliefs
- Thread starter Jack Davenport
- Start date
Mr. Daystar
In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
A company that big could have easily switched around freight and dispatched different drivers....but they shouldn't have had to. When you go to work for a huge road operation, even at the newbie stage of truck driving you can safely assume a few things. First of all, they will keep you on the road as long as they can, and even though they promised you home that weekend, an emergency popped up, and they have no one else. You can also be sure, you will haul any, and everything, to almost any place. These guys took the job, and I'm sure have had to deal with a lot of silly bullshit on the road, no one asked them to consume, or handle the cargo.
Not only that, but do you know how many Muslims own convenience stores? Not one that I know of refuse to sell beer, wine, pork rinds, even pornographic CD's and magazines. They took the job knowing what the company hauls and was a way for them to pursue a lawsuit. This Obama EEOC chomps at the bit to go after shit like this. So transparent and I am so sick of it, I could scream.
save your screams for the language police :eek:
it's "champing at the bit" not "chomping at the bit"
save your screams for the language police :eek:
it's "champing at the bit" not "chomping at the bit"
No motherfucker, in this country it's "chomping at the bit" Of course you wouldn't know anything about that because with the dental hygiene in your country, you are lucky to be able chew porridge without choking. BTW it's "defense" not "defence" "checks" not "cheques" "favor" not "favour" .
Could somebody post this where that giant douche nozzle can see it so he shuts the fuck up about it? Because if there's one thing we can count on, it's that as soon as he's presented with some contradictory facts, he'll stop pushing disproved arguments.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/british-teeth-arent-that-bad-american-teeth-are-far-worse/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/british-teeth-arent-that-bad-american-teeth-are-far-worse/
no cuntyballs,
did you even read the link you posted.
to quote from that
"Still, if you’re writing for school or for readers who are versed in English, champing at the bit is probably the safer choice."
as for
"it's "defense" not "defence" "checks" not "cheques" "favor" not "favour""
without wanting to offend any non-brit english speakers - except you, you prick,
there's a reason english is called english - it's because it was invented in england
so do me a favour, whether you want to take offence or not, check what the original spellings were before noah webster & co. started "reforming" the language
this is the way we still spell these words in the home of the language - the UK, others can do as they wish
honestly, you're such a dumb-ass, and you seem proud to constantly exhibit this fact to everyone on here
Yes I did read the link jism lips and there were as many examples in that article of the "American version" of the phrase as there were old English. We speak American English in this country and "chomping at the bit" is perfectly acceptable from where my post emanates.
Your English is about as relevant now as those royal welfare recipients your little country picks up the tab for.
Even slang in pop culture, music and everything else originates from American English so run along to your foods high in sugar content and fat and your bad sit-coms and sore gums and leave the language of the modern world up to the rest of the world. You right proper prat.
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
Now they will have to accommodate everyone's beliefs.
This can be used against any business. Good job, morons.
This can be used against any business. Good job, morons.
well, let us be clear - this slang you're referring to mostly originates from black american english,
with a sprinkling of gay slang too
which i bet you love, you brainless racist homophobe
and for someone who doesn't care about the uk & the brits you sure talk plenty of shit about us
Ace Boobtoucher
Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
It's definitely "Chomping." You'll notice, fuckwit, that when you go to quote me the red squiggly line under "fuckwit." That means something is misspelled. There's no squiggly under "chomping." Go be a fuckwit somewhere else.
well, let us be clear - this slang you're referring to mostly originates from black american english,
with a sprinkling of gay slang too
which i bet you love, you brainless racist homophobe
and for someone who doesn't care about the uk & the brits you sure talk plenty of shit about us
If you think American pop culture and music and its influences arw mostly black and gay...wait never mind, of course that is what you think. Your smiles don't make you any less of a chutney ferret.
Ace Boobtoucher
Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
That cock chugger probably mispronounces "aluminum," too.
This is where your fundamental misunderstanding of SCOTUS' role comes into play. They are in place to interpret the constitution not make laws. They interpreted it correctly in this instance. Something that has been in short supply lately.
If any religion objects to something and are protected within the parameters of that decision then I will side with them.
Do you know of some muzzie plot to turn it on it's ears? It really is a dumb question, because religions won't fight it, non religious groups will.
BlkHawk
Closed Account
So you agree Kim Davis should be impeached for not doing her job? The muslim flight attendant should lose her job for not serving alcohol.
Personally if you can't do a job due to religious or personal beliefs find a new job that doesn't conflict with your views.
Similar threads
