Do you get turned on by vintage porn?

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Hells yeah. Not all vintage porn was great, or even good. But I would say that even the worst porn films (yeah, shot on film!) from the 60's and 70's was better than the best of the generic, politically correct, assembly line beach ball fake tits on a plastic surgery nightmare of a bleach blonde, who has Wesson oil dripping off her ass, shot with a handheld video camera crap of today.

IMO, it's the same with mainstream TV shows and movies. It's hard to turn on the TV or go to a movie and find an original concept. Everything just follows a tired, PC formula these days.
 
Hells yeah. Not all vintage porn was great, or even good. But I would say that even the worst porn films (yeah, shot on film!) from the 60's and 70's was better than the best of the generic, politically correct, assembly line beach ball fake tits on a plastic surgery nightmare of a bleach blonde, who has Wesson oil dripping off her ass, shot with a handheld video camera crap of today.

IMO, it's the same with mainstream TV shows and movies. It's hard to turn on the TV or go to a movie and find an original concept. Everything just follows a tired, PC formula these days.

How is today's porn "politically correct"?
 

Rane1071

For the EMPEROR!!
If we're talking 80's, then hell yes!

 
  • Like
Reactions: BCT
oh yeah. just look at that.

(click to enlarge)



I'm thinking this was some kind of golden age. I'm going to nut to that 3rd pic btw. I'm calling it now.
 
Oh hell yes! Anything from the 70s-90s is awesome! :D:D

11%20%283%29.jpg
50170354a7f1fd8ffa4.jpg
205645549f00ac9ecc2.jpg
13.jpg
16%20%282%29.jpg
 
I do ...however, the quality is of course not as good as today's quality so I much prefer newer porn. But sure .....hot chicks and pussy turn me on whether the content was produced 10 minutes ago or 40 years ago.

I find the decrease in quality due to obsolete technology is more than made up for by the greater effort that was put into production back then.
 
I find the decrease in quality due to obsolete technology is more than made up for by the greater effort that was put into production back then.

The top 10-20% or so were filmed in 35mm by people that knew how to light a set, position the actors and get good audio, but yes most of stuff were lesser quality.
 
The top 10-20% or so were filmed in 35mm by people that knew how to light a set, position the actors and get good audio, but yes most of stuff were lesser quality.

There has also been crappy work in any era. The top stuff was of course also the best as it is with an era, but it's not just that. I wasn't just talking about the technical aspects of the photos or film. More importantly the content they tried to put into it was generally better. I get the sense that on the whole the people who made it back then actually cared about there product more. True, given the subject matter, then and now, maybe that's not saying much for a lot of it. However, I feel even in the products of people that weren't at the top in the technical aspects of filmaking they at least tried and more effort was put into it more often. They also get more of a break from me as it was actually harder to make good looking films back then and more actual knowhow was required.

Today, the people that make the stuff generally do the cheapest, easiest, quickest thing they can do that they can get away with and that lets them make money as fast as they can at their level notoriety of the industry. They can better get away with it because they have the crutch of new technology to fall back on, and porn has fallen off so far most of their competition is going to be as bad as they are.

If one considers the content they filmed, and not just how it was filmed, it's no contest. The old stuff blows what's made today out of the water.
 

CrimsonBolt

I AM A SLUT FOR RYAN GOSLING
Yes i am

Here's some review from my two first porn movies. (It takes time to take the screenshots so i hope you will like it)

First porn movie that i seen was a cumpilation movie called Cameroun from the collection champions du monde (worlds champ)
It was an amateur one not plot only fucking :)
The movie wasn't that good, there where only one scene that really liked.
It was the fourth scene with Jordan Mcknight and the scene provide from the movie "More black dirty debutantes 2" and i watched that scene over and over again.

It was an anal scene and i think is the first and only anal scene that Jordan did.
She get fucked by Ed Powers and her moans looked like she wasn't comfortable doing anal and it making so hot.
At the end Ed showing her ass to the camera and her ass was too fucking red!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My seconde porn was really amazing i watched the movie a lot of time especiallythe three first scenes.

The movie name was "Selen video magazine 2"

The plot, I guy played poker with some friends and of course he lost.
So the winner takes his wife and invite his friend to enjoy the lady, the friend was only allowed to put his dick to the lady face the rest is only for the winner.

Scene 1 Selen AKA Selen De Rosa

In a hot threesome getting fucked in the pussy then in the ass, very hot the second guy touch Selen pussy when the other fuck her ass and you see i nice close up of the pink, Also the lady who do the moans in the french version had i really exiting voice making the scene much more hard to watch.



When the scene end you see Selen husband sit in a chair driking and smoking, he thinking to an old friend that was an lady man.

Scene 2 Anita Blond

She get fucked in the lady man office, that scene was very hot too, you got and blowjob that offer POV angle.
And some great positions (has you can see in the caps) all with great cameran angle.



after the scene the Selen husband still thinking about that guy (lol) and wondering what he's become.

Scene 3 Deborah Wells (love that lady sooooo much! :))

She's also fucked by that lady man another great scene with great positions and cameran angle.
The lightning of that scene was also very good and i love the way that Deborah watch behind with her sexy eyes when she get fucked doggy.



Scene 4 Meryl Box

Well i tell you i enjoy more the three first scenes, that one wasn't that good for the simple reason Meryl isn't attractive at all.
Ok she got big tits but her face and the haircut... (Mireille Mathieu style, google it if you curious to see how it looks)

the plot was the husband of Selen cast Meryl (she wants to be a model) and of course she need to fuck him to get the job.
At the end he said he gonna call her and telling if she receive the job.

Then
Scene 5 Diana Stevens AKA Diana Stevenson

She wasn't particulary attractive neither but this scene was nice to watch.
Good position good lighning.
In this scene she fuck the colleague of Selen husband and mysteriously disappear at the end.



Scene 6 (Final) Diana Stevens AKA Diana Stevenson

Diana again this time fucking Selen's husband outdoor, actully that one wasn't that good due to the natural light (to many light)
When they finish the lady disappear again.

at the end of the movie Selen's husband where in his colleague office and talking with him about that mysterious lady, and his colleague said that's strang i had the same thing, then the lady appear in the office and takes both of them with her.

The End.
 
There has also been crappy work in any era. The top stuff was of course also the best as it is with an era, but it's not just that. I wasn't just talking about the technical aspects of the photos or film. More importantly the content they tried to put into it was generally better. I get the sense that on the whole the people who made it back then actually cared about there product more. True, given the subject matter, then and now, maybe that's not saying much for a lot of it. However, I feel even in the products of people that weren't at the top in the technical aspects of film making they at least tried and more effort was put into it more often. They also get more of a break from me as it was actually harder to make good looking films back then and more actual knowhow was required.

Today, the people that make the stuff generally do the cheapest, easiest, quickest thing they can do that they can get away with and that lets them make money as fast as they can at their level notoriety of the industry. They can better get away with it because they have the crutch of new technology to fall back on, and porn has fallen off so far most of their competition is going to be as bad as they are.

If one considers the content they filmed, and not just how it was filmed, it's no contest. The old stuff blows what's made today out of the water.

Also for some back in the 60s-70s (Kay Parker, Annette Haven, Marilyn Chambers come to mind) felt their work contributed positively to the Sexual Revolution. Today that's not the case. Although the bigger companies still make a couple each year with big (+$50k) budgets, solid scripts, sets, talent. If you look at the dozen or so movies that get nominated at AVN awards there's time & effort in all of them.
 
Top