Dind dong Boston's gone

Tonight, the Boston Red Sox proved that they are not the dynasty that theyre fans claimed, but just another good team that won a couple championships in a few years. They are nothing but this decades version of the Toronto Blue Jays.
 
Tonight, the Boston Red Sox proved that they are not the dynasty that theyre fans claimed, but just another good team that won a couple championships in a few years. They are nothing but this decades version of the Toronto Blue Jays.

What you just described, sir, is the definition of a dynasty.
 
The difference between Boston going to the world series and not: MANNY RAMIREZ

Now Im betting they didnt trade him.
 
Considering your username it's an expected answer and hard to take you seriously (not an ******). As for the series I'm ALWAYS glad to see a new face in their, especially a team that built itself from youth and just didn't try to buy it's way to a championship.

Personally I'll be happy whoever wins the WS, but I'll be pulling for the Philly's slightly more to root for Jamie Moyer who won the most games for my SORRY Mariners in team history. Class guy and a huge asset to the community with his charity work.
 
fucking asshole, i taped the game:thefinger
 
You have to hand it to the Rays being that they have amongst the lowest of payrolls in the league. :hatsoff:

First Series for the Ray's ! :cool:
 
Yes, a team that hasn't even won a division title in 15 years is a dynasty. :rolleyes:

Well correct me if I'm wrong, but the Jays won titles in 92 and 93, as many as the Sox have recently in fewer years, so they would have to classify as a dynasty no? yet when I mention it you make fun of it. How is this different than Boston's 2 titles. Boston has only one division title since 1996, as long as we are talking about division titles here.
 
Atlanta Braves in the '90s were a dynasty ... that couldnt win World Series.

Kinda the same with the poor 'Sox?
 
Well correct me if I'm wrong, but the Jays won titles in 92 and 93, as many as the Sox have recently in fewer years, so they would have to classify as a dynasty no? yet when I mention it you make fun of it. How is this different than Boston's 2 titles. Boston has only one division title since 1996, as long as we are talking about division titles here.

When did I say "I think Boston is a dynasty"...??? :dunno: I was just pointing out your contradicting opinion.
 
Back
Top