In one word Denise Milani was fabulous, i still keep a collection of her videos on my hard drive for the good old times sake :))). I wish she had a sextape or something or make a sextape and somehow slip on the net..... i'm daydreaming :)))).
 
Nothing to do with photoshop mate.

I just didn't realise you had basically the only correct definition of porn in the universe, and everyone else was incorrect.

"Anyone who thinks differently lives in denial" is a statement of someone who is either an absolute authority on a topic, of blindly fucking ignorant and arrogant. I'm sure it's the former.

I just don't let Photoshop fool me :)
 
She did Softcore porn from 2007 till 2009.

Nothing accidental, she posed in many see-thru outfits.

It's not culturism, it is a husband doing well in his furniture repair business.

1. When and where did she do softcore porn?
2. I'd say its pretty accidental when even through "see thtough" outfits we need to stretch our imagination and assume things are what they are. Plus there are plenty of shots where we should be able to see something but we don't becasue she has had her nipples and vag editied out with photoshop or some other editing software. She's went to some pretty far lenghts to ensure that people cna't see her nipples, or anything else, so yeah the nipple slips were clearly accidental.
3. It's not culturalism, really??? Then why is her reason for not going nude or even topless (true topless anyways, hand-bra doenst count, in my opinion it isnt topless if you cant see nipples) because she doesn't want people to see her as a slut/whore/whatever else you want to call it? She keeps her clothes on because she wants people to think she is classy, not because her husdand doenst want her to show her tits, if that were the case she wouldn't have taken 90% of the photos she has in the first place.
 
It is the intention that counts!

A random girl in bikini at the beach is very different from someone with XXL implants who is shaking her ass and tits in dental floss thongs and transparent top.
Denise Milani did softcore porn, very softcore but still porn.
Anyone who thinks differently lives in denial.
PS @ shazz: I do think all politicians are whores, but thats another story...


Look here pal, dont get upset because you're wrong, just admit it, learn from it, and don't let it happen again.

You say based on the intention of her work Denise Milani has done softcore porn. Well, the FCC wouldn't consider her work to be softcore porn since they could all be safley printed into maxim, stuff, or any other mens magazine that is not considered pornographic. Just in case you didn't know, the FCC is the (or at least a major) authority on this suject. Also, playboy isn't even considered pronography by the magority of the population, most people would say they are nude models not pornstars or softcore-pornstars. The intention of all of these are to make money by arousing men/women (mostly men, I just want to cover al my bases) by means of printing and distributing images of attrative women in their magazines and even videos on their websites. The "worst" catagory you could put Denise Milani in would be with Playboy models however, she has never posed nude so that automatically makes takes her out of that catagory. That would put her into the catagory of plain old model. To be more specific, she is not a fachion model since she doesn't sell the clothes she poses in, this is true. There is a category of model for women like her however, there are actually several, but for Denise Milani it would be glamor model since she is obviously not a super model. A super model would be someone like Tyra Banks, who is also a fahion model, and speaking of her would you say that the Victoria's Secret models do softcore porn? Probably, but you's be wrong, even though the intention is to sell sexy lingerie and thus sex, and that is going way out on a limb on my part but it is argueable (afterall the purpose of lingerie is sex since granny panites serve the purpose of an undergarment just fine, they're just unappealing). If you told Tyra Banks she was a softcore pornstar she would probably kick your ass, the same is probably true of Denise Milani.

Sorry buddy you made a valient effort but unfortunalty for you there is no way possible that you can win this one. You could quote Mark Twain all day and you'll still be wrong, I could write you a formal, scholarly essay as to why we are right and you are wrong but that'd be going overboard. Unless the mods promised to permanently remove the user they felt was wrong from freeones completley and without refund (incase you have paid for any services), then I'd be all over it, you'd be gone for good and we would never have to read your nonesense ever again.
 
Just to add a little more fuel to the fire, I don't know all the laws and regulations print magazines have to abide by but I bet that someone that works for freeones could get an editor or someone form maxim or something to give us thier insight on this topic. I don't know how we could get them to make that happen but never the less I'm willing to bet it can be made to happen and that said person would agree with us and tell you that you are wrong.
 
Ok, so... how about we get back into posting pictures of Miss Milani? Everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how ridiculous it may seem. So what if he thinks she does softcore porn - it's just an opinion! Here are some PICS!

 
Then why is her reason for not going nude or even topless (true topless anyways, hand-bra doenst count, in my opinion it isnt topless if you cant see nipples) because she doesn't want people to see her as a slut/whore/whatever else you want to call it?
This is exactly the point!
She worked with porn stars like Jaime Hammer and Maggie Green.
She worked with porn sites like Pinup Files and Action Girls.
She promoted herself in adult conventions.
Yet like you said "She went to some pretty far lengths to ensure that people can't see her nipples, or anything else".
Life isn't black or white, there are many shades of gray in between...
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how ridiculous it may seem.
Thank you! Just two corrections: She's a Mrs. and she did (past tense) soft core porn.
 
What a plum!

In a nutshell buddy, if i bought a "porn" mag or "porn" film and it contained no nudity I'd be demanding my money back.

A woman being sexy and alluring is not porn ya dumbass otherwise every woman going out on the pull could be classed as a live softcore porn star.

get a grip
 
Well said.

I think touch wood may in fact be amish, so perhaps everything is at the very least soft core porn.

Or, he should take a long walk off a short pier.

Either way.
What a plum!

In a nutshell buddy, if i bought a "porn" mag or "porn" film and it contained no nudity I'd be demanding my money back.

A woman being sexy and alluring is not porn ya dumbass otherwise every woman going out on the pull could be classed as a live softcore porn star.

get a grip
 
@leorin
In a statement her former manager released during their legal battle he declared their income.
From that figure she had 2000-2500 paying members (now she probably have 50-100 :) )!
How come no one was demanding his money back???
Again, the intention of a woman in a pool is swimming and sunbathing, not arousing you in order to take your money.
 
This is exactly the point!

So now you are saying that being a slut makes you a softcore pornstar?! Are you for real man! Wow, well you better keep you daughter away from high school and especially college, those places are crawling with softcore porn. And don't even think about taking your family to the beach,they might be getting exposed to pornography.

Seriously though, your an idiot, just plain dumb and you need to be silenced.
 
@leorin
In a statement her former manager released during their legal battle he declared their income.
From that figure she had 2000-2500 paying members (now she probably have 50-100 :) )!
How come no one was demanding his money back???
Again, the intention of a woman in a pool is swimming and sunbathing, not arousing you in order to take your money.


Because they were not buying porn dumb shit! The reason that she had so many members for so long was in the hopes that she would eventually transition from glamor model to nude model (neither of which is a softcore pornstar). People started realizing that wasn't gonna happen so membership has dropped.

And the intention of a woman in a bathing suit is only partially to sunbath (which by the way is for the purposes of making said woman more attractive and thus the intention is now for the purposes of arousal). Said woman is more likely than not wearing a bikini, which by the way is worn with the intention of arousal since it's purpose is to make women look attractive while they are in/at/around a body of water. Why would woman want to look attrcative, hmmmm lets think about that.... oh that's right to attract a date/mate via arousal. Since social conventions dictate that a woman should not pay for anything on a first date or when being hit on at a bar/club/anywhere else that women get hit on, unless it is by another woman, that means that said woman is at the pool sunbathing with the intention of making her self more attractive so that she can find a date who will in turn pay for her drinks and/or meal. And that is leaving out the whole bathing suit (which is likely a bikini) situation. So in other words, yes the woman
 
@leorin
In a statement her former manager released during their legal battle he declared their income.
From that figure she had 2000-2500 paying members (now she probably have 50-100 :) )!
How come no one was demanding his money back???
Again, the intention of a woman in a pool is swimming and sunbathing, not arousing you in order to take your money.


Because they were not buying porn dumb shit! The reason that she had so many members for so long was in the hopes that she would eventually transition from glamor model to nude model (neither of which is a softcore pornstar). People started realizing that wasn't gonna happen so membership has dropped.

And the intention of a woman in a bathing suit is only partially to sunbath (which by the way is for the purposes of making said woman more attractive and thus the intention is now for the purposes of arousal). Said woman is more likely than not wearing a bikini, which by the way is worn with the intention of arousal since it's purpose is to make women look attractive while they are in/at/around a body of water. Why would woman want to look attractive, hmmmm lets think about that.... oh that's right to attract a date/mate via arousal. Since social conventions dictate that a woman should not pay for anything on a first date or when being hit on at a bar/club/anywhere else that women get hit on, unless it is by another woman, that means that said woman is at the pool sunbathing with the intention of making her self more attractive so that she can find a date who will in turn pay for her drinks and/or meal. And that is leaving out the whole bathing suit (which is likely a bikini) situation. So in other words, yes the intention of the woman at the pool is to arouse you and take your money.

So according to you any woman who sunbathes, wears a bikini (or any other bathing suit that isn't a one piece), shows any skin above the knee, shows any cleavage, wears her hair down (or up in some cases), does her hair, wears makeup, wears perfume, shaves her legs, wears heels, flirts, shows any stomach skin, wears tight clothes, etc. is a softcore pornstar because the intention of all of these things is to make a woman more attractive thus the intention is to arouse you and take your money.

We all know this can not be true since there is not a single woman on Earth who does not meet this criteria in one way or another. Just admit that you are wrong and stop arguing, I'm smarter than you and I'll only keep proving you wrong no matter what you say.
 
Glamor model? have you ever seen her on a catwalk or in a campaign of armani or dolce&gabbana? :)

Denise Milani was the most hypocrite model in the history of soft core porn.
 
That's because you still incorrectly believe she does softcore porn. Despite many people trying to inform you otherwise. Ya know, like the Oxford Dictionary.

She's not a glamour model. She just a bikini model. Who will never go nude.

How is it any more complicated than that?

Glamor model? have you ever seen her on a catwalk or in a campaign of armani or dolce&gabbana? :)

Denise Milani was the most hypocrite model in the history of soft core porn.
 
I still don't think her stuff qualifies as softcore as put forth by others. She poses in a bikini in front of a camera. So do many women during a family outing at the beach or local pool, but they aren't considered pornographic.

But I get what the soft core folks are saying.

Anyone have pics from her recent stuff? As in her fitness material, even if it's tame/lame?
 
Top