I bet she does have scars around the areolas (ala Veronica Zemanova).
Then we should all cut around our own areola's to let her know we don't care about the scars...
I bet she does have scars around the areolas (ala Veronica Zemanova).
All the juvenile whining notwithstanding about how much she annoys by not revealing 'the puppies' (Seriously; this is the stuff of a Kevin Smith movie, wherein girlfriends, sisters, mothers, friends become privy to some of the foot-stamping, breath-held-until-blue rants of posters here...), she's a very cagey businessperson. Once they're revealed, her stock goes down immeasurably: Annemarie, Jana Defi, Anya Sakova, Bea Flora, yadda, yadda, yadda. The gal's in control. It's HER game...and everyone's hangin' around, paying attention while she does things her way. How much it infuriates some of you, aggravates...matters not one whit, because-
*remembers that he's now lecturing guys who have so much time on their hands that they spend at least some of it online, obsessing about naked chicks... ARRRRRRRGGGGHHHHH!*
Anyway; Photoshop magicians, start your engines!
LOL
Pic. nr. 2. Look at how short her legs are. She wears some 5in heels there and still her legs look short. Look at the knee-to-ankle distance on her standing leg. How can some people say she has perfect legs ???
Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that this thread needs a good cleaning up??
I mean get rid of some of the pointless posts about her tits being real or not, has she got nipples etc....
Why can't we just appreciate her for what she does, and those who can't accept that, stay away from this thread. :2 cents:
Why don't we start from getting rid of those, who don't accept others' different opinions ? How many times do you fan-folks have to be reminded that this is not a worship forum, but a discussion forum ? For definiton of the word "discussion" get any damn dictionary. If You want to only see pictures and read ouh-ah's on her, go to her website or Yahoo group and don't write the same calls on and on here. The issue whether her tits are real or not is fundamental to some.
Why don't we start from getting rid of those, who don't accept others' different opinions ? How many times do you fan-folks have to be reminded that this is not a worship forum, but a discussion forum ? For definiton of the word "discussion" get any damn dictionary. If You want to only see pictures and read ouh-ah's on her, go to her website or Yahoo group and don't write the same calls on and on here. The issue whether her tits are real or not is fundamental to some.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Well said. The fanboy worship in this thread borders on teh ghey. And the only new posts available are discussions on if her tits are real, and if she'll ever show them. It's better to post that, then endless fucking repeats of the same pictures and how you can see 1mm of areola, perhaps, maybe, mightbe, there'sashadowofanipple, magnified 200X.
Fucking Rachel Aldana has shown more nipple than this chick, and she's just getting started.
Pic. nr. 2. Look at how short her legs are. She wears some 5in heels there and still her legs look short. Look at the knee-to-ankle distance on her standing leg. How can some people say she has perfect legs ???
A women don't need to be tall to have perfect Legs....and Denise are one of those women's. She is so fit.
Pic. nr. 2. Look at how short her legs are. She wears some 5in heels there and still her legs look short. Look at the knee-to-ankle distance on her standing leg. How can some people say she has perfect legs ???
Well......I think her legs look just fine here!
http://galleries9.petiteteenager.com/3/denisevillaterrace/14.jpg
Who fucking cares what you think? Don't like 'em, don't read 'em. Don't you come from that tiny little insignificant island of bad teeth, that no one cares about...internet tough guy? PS, I am thick as shit :thefinger
Hey guys, just have small question...is there any more thread in the entire forum which contains 109 pages???? really like to know that....