Problem is this, how are the students' performances judge? Is it based on standardize testing? Will teachers now be forced to teach to the tests due to money being invested to their school and school districts? If so, who makes the tests? Who decides what students should and should not know?
It opens up a huge can of worms we dont need to. I remember being in high school honors and being blatantly lied to about a test like this. "You need to do well because it will go on your transcripts, blah blah blah" when in reality it didn't nor did colleges even care about these tests. So why were we lied to? Because we were the "smart" ones. They needed us to take this seriously and to do well because money for the school was involved. Now, if they were just honest with us, I'm sure we all would have done our best anyway. The lying left a very bad taste in our mouths to say the least.
I'm all for teacher responsibility, of course. It's sad to go back to the same school, go see teachers that used to be so vibrant and enthusiastic when I had them, then just ten years later they become drones beaten down by the system.
The point is this: is this really how we want to go about things? All that will happen is that teachers, whether they want to or not, will be "persuaded" to teach only to the test. Again, who decides what's on that test anyway? And why do they get to decide what students should know?
Tricky situation indeed.