Fucking ridiculous how much attention this tiny percentage of people has garnered and how much power is wielded in their name. Bruce Jenner isn't brave or stunning. Trannies have no right to expect society to accommodate their desire to have their contrived gender identities recognized as a valid thing. Espn fucked up because they stifled his first amendment rights, but he is a public figure and was associated with their brand. Tough call but you can probably guess who I support in this thing.
We are witnessing the death march of Free Speech courtesy of the PC movement.
Fucking ridiculous how much attention this tiny percentage of people has garnered and how much power is wielded in their name. Bruce Jenner isn't brave or stunning. Trannies have no right to expect society to accommodate their desire to have their contrived gender identities recognized as a valid thing. Espn fucked up because they stifled his first amendment rights, but he is a public figure and was associated with their brand. Tough call but you can probably guess who I support in this thing.
We are witnessing the death march of Free Speech courtesy of the PC movement.
For the billionth time, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. We keep having the covo every time one of these public figures gets fired from his gig for something he/she says. The government did not censor Schilling. He signed a contract with ESPN, they've made it clear to him that they do not want him making these kinds of political statements while he's employed by them, you know because they're a sports entertainment network not a cable news network. The 1st doesn't mean you have the right to say whatever you want and you'll be free from suffering the consequences of said speech. The 1st does not give you the right to a job. The 1st is a two way street, Schilling has the right to say what he wants and ESPN has the right to decide that they do not want to be associated with such speech. If Schilling is unhappy with with his employer's rules, he can go work somewhere else.
For the billionth time, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. We keep having the covo every time one of these public figures gets fired from his gig for something he/she says. The government did not censor Schilling. He signed a contract with ESPN, they've made it clear to him that they do not want him making these kinds of political statements while he's employed by them, you know because they're a sports entertainment network not a cable news network. The 1st doesn't mean you have the right to say whatever you want and you'll be free from suffering the consequences of said speech. The 1st does not give you the right to a job. The 1st is a two way street, Schilling has the right to say what he wants and ESPN has the right to decide that they do not want to be associated with such speech. If Schilling is unhappy with with his employer's rules, he can go work somewhere else.
Well, there is an element of his freedom of speech being infringed upon. That is not to say that ESPN did anything wrong by letting him go.
They certainly didn't violate his constitutional rights. .
That said, Curt was well aware of ESPN's policy of not tolerating controversial commentary.
He obviously didn't care.
I agree with Curt on a lot of issues. He was a phenomenal pitcher and he will land somewhere related to baseball.
Curt, during your next gig, try and keep your opinions to yourself if you think they will get you canned. Better yet, just run for Congress. I bet you might have a chance at being elected.
For the billionth time, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. We keep having the covo every time one of these public figures gets fired from his gig for something he/she says. The government did not censor Schilling. He signed a contract with ESPN, they've made it clear to him that they do not want him making these kinds of political statements while he's employed by them, you know because they're a sports entertainment network not a cable news network. The 1st doesn't mean you have the right to say whatever you want and you'll be free from suffering the consequences of said speech. The 1st does not give you the right to a job. The 1st is a two way street, Schilling has the right to say what he wants and ESPN has the right to decide that they do not want to be associated with such speech. If Schilling is unhappy with with his employer's rules, he can go work somewhere else.