Connecticut school shooting: 18 *****ren among 27 dead

Vanilla Bear

Bears For Life
Fuck that's horrible! Didn't even hear about it until now here!

May their souls rest in peace. Condolences to all the families over there!
 
Watch out cause the Canadians and Mexicans have been seen talking. ;)

Oh, and you really brought up 9/11 for you box cutter argument? Really that's your big reason why everyone should be armed?

You said we can run from a box cutter armed person, not me. Are you upset you are wrong?

9/11 ****ed a lot of people because of crazy people armed with sharp weapons in a *** free zone. That is indisputable fact.

This morning, was there an armed security guard or cop in the school? My HS had a NYPD armed policeman in it.
 
Fighting for the right to own a firearm is also fighting for the right for criminals to own firearms. How many of these people are regular law abiding citizens until the *** they own helps carry them into criminalville? Banning guns won't happen and won't solve the problem, but to deny that *** laws are fine the way they are is silly.
 
You said we can run from a box cutter armed person, not me. Are you upset you are wrong?

9/11 ****ed a lot of people because of crazy people armed with sharp weapons in a *** free zone. That is indisputable fact.

This morning, was there an armed security guard or cop in the school? My HS had a NYPD armed policeman in it.

It wasn't the box cutters that scared people, it was the fact the hijackers said they had bombs and most people on the plane probably thought this was just a hostage type of situation. They didn't massacre a whole plane with box cutters.
 
Or a locked cockpit door you mean?

If studies indicated only a locked door is required why:

Is TSA search so thorough?
Are Air Marshals that are armed embarked on planes?
Is the door both locked and light armored?


The devilish tongue on mankind has caused more death and mayhem than any ***. Using your logic progression, we should have strict speech control? Speech control sounds dumb huh? Well, governments have speech control and use a similar logic to *** control to justify it.

Does anyone believe in all free man's civil rights?
 
Why is it that with almost 300 million guns (that are legal or illegally owned in the US, many more unaccounted) there are never sharp shooting, truth talking , god fearing guys like Sam and Will are never around to stop things like this? Is it may hap that paper targets and deer don't shoot back? Cowards, the whole lot of yous.
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
The whole criminals will only have guns argument doesn't work because the people doing these shootings are regular people who have lost their minds and thus having easy access to guns is a surefire recipe for disaster. Take me for example I'm in Canada and say I snap one day and decide I'm going to off a bunch of people, one problem is that I don't have access to a *** and I don't know anybody who does either so what do I do?

Bottomline, the easier it is to have guns around, the more this kind of **** will continue to happen especially when it's running in the media 24/7 and every suicidal nutjob sees that and decides that if they die they might as well be famous.

You do what most of this spineless pieces of garbage do...you obtain them illegally in the U.S.A., smuggle them back, and do what you wanna do. Chicago Ill. has some of the strictest *** laws in the country, yet their crime rate, involving guns, is one of the highest. Up until lawsuits were filed in Washington D.C., and *** rights restored, they had high crime rates
too.

This act was cowardly, and despicable, an atrocity...but as Mayhem posted, this isn't the only country this kind of thing happens in, and guns aren't the only way people hurt other people.
 
They effectively gained control of 3 planes using a box cutter, in a *** free zone, which allowed the ****** of thousands. The forth plane fought back, and everyone died, but the true American heroes on that plane saved untold thousands in the process.

How would stricter laws have helped this morning? The dead ****** legally purchased them in the forth most restrictive state. The *** stole them, making him a *** thief, then ****ed his m-m the owner, then the ****.

It is impossible to recall in 290,000,000 firearms.

The magazine capacity doesn't matter. Just carry more mags or more guns.

The hunting (sporting) rifles pack way more power than a military rifle. A hunting rifle is designed to take down a several hundred pound ****** from a distance. A military rifle (223) is designed to seriously wound an enemy at a moderate distance or be lethal at closer range (look up the rem 30 ultra mag or a 338 lapua)

A shotgun with 8 rounds of .30 OO buck would have been more deadly in close quarters.
 
If studies indicated only a locked door is required why:

Is TSA search so thorough?
Are Air Marshals that are armed embarked on planes?
Is the door both locked and light armored?


The devilish tongue on mankind has caused more death and mayhem than any ***. Using your logic progression, we should have strict speech control? Speech control sounds dumb huh? Well, governments have speech control and use a similar logic to *** control to justify it.

Does anyone believe in all free man's civil rights?
Because it would have stopped it, not because it was a *** free zone.
To make people FEEL better, just like everybody wanting guns. The rest is just you being stupid.
 
Fighting for the right to own a firearm is also fighting for the right for criminals to own firearms. How many of these people are regular law abiding citizens until the *** they own helps carry them into criminalville? Banning guns won't happen and won't solve the problem, but to deny that *** laws are fine the way they are is silly.


Let's apply this to something else:

Fighting for the right to ***** **** is also fighting for the right for ***** driving man slaughters to ***** ****.
(Let's bring prohibition back!)

Fighting for the right to own property is also fighting for the right for criminals to own property.
(let's be communist!)

Fighting for the right to an uncensored internet is also fighting for the right for criminals to an uncensored internet.
(Let's be China!)

Fighting for the right to own a firearm is also fighting for the right for criminals to own firearms.
(Let's be Britain and Australia and **** Germany and Stalin's USSR!)


None of that is the American way.

We screwed up prohibition, and we know we did. The reason behind prohibition was that a undrunken man doesn't ****, beat his ******, or **** himself. It didn't work.

We are even learning that pot should be legal, and yes, I am in one of those states, and yes, I voted to legalize a civil right.
 
So the American way is to accept this as an inevitability? People will get their hands on guns one way or another, so tragedies like today are just something we have to accept. People will die so I can collect guns. **** happens.
 
Because it would have stopped it, not because it was a *** free zone.
To make people FEEL better, just like everybody wanting guns. The rest is just you being stupid.

I'm using logic, reason, and argument. You don't make a valid point, and you resort to insulting me. Name calling... Perhaps you should try to address the rest of the quote you took from my post instead of name calling.


I guess me and the other 50% of my country are dumb. And by that, I don't mean Republicans.

Democrats are thieves.
Republicans are thieves that talk like patriots, but due just as much damage.
 

Alyssa Rose

Official Checked Star Member
I am horrified at the tragedy that happened in Connecticut today but I can not believe how many of you are blaming the *** instead of the MAN behind the ***!! The *** did not make this man do what he did, he was a deeply disturbed man with obvious emotional issues with his parents. He could have made a bomb, he could have drove his car through the school playground during recess, or he could've ****ed the *****ren by attacking them with a ***** like the psycho in China today!Story here The *** didn't do this, the man did, if one of those teachers had a *** on them the fatality level would have been much much less. This is overwhelmingly sad but no reason to ****** the second amendment. I believe in background and psychiatric evaluations before somebody can own a ***, I think if people had to have a license to own a *** instead of just to carry one it might make things harder for the crazy people to get ahold of one.. But like I said, if this guy wanted to inflict pain and suffering on people so badly and guns weren't available to him, he would've found some other way to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCT

Shifty

O.G.
I'm using logic, reason, and argument. You don't make a valid point, and you resort to insulting me. Name calling... Perhaps you should try to address the rest of the quote you took from my post instead of name calling.


I guess me and the other 50% of my country are dumb. And by that, I don't mean Republicans.

Democrats are thieves.
Republicans are thieves that talk like patriots, but due just as much damage.

Logic? Reason? Your posts are barely coherent.
 
This is not the thread for *** control discussion. This is the thread to talk about crazy, nut-job bastards who did this to ****. *** control is not the issue here, the issue here is crazy, stupid people. Give everyone in the world a ***, if this happens, it isn't because they have a ***, it's because there is something seriously fucking wrong with them.

Keep in mind that I'm very much for strict *** control laws. This just isn't the issue here. These are crazy, hateful people.

Well said.
 
Top