CNN is Starting to Piss me Off

[titsrock]

^
Let's review...
1. Redeye is basically an entertainment program.
2. You admitted that Breitfart took a piece of tape out of context and created a story that ended up getting someone fired....and most recently an apology to the fired person from the White House.

Shouldn't Breitfart be sued by Shirley Sherrell? The white family she allegedly slurred seems to like her? :dunno:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2010/07/23/kaye.breitbarts.fingerprints.pkg.cnn?hpt=C2

If Breitfart gets sued he'll just make another propaganda piece and run over to Fox for a tears and pass-the-kleenex session with Billo the Clown, the Manatee and maybe even Greta?

 

[pete rose]

You weren't pissed before? Stop watching all political news outlets.

 

[LukeEl]

There's still a CNN on the air, whoa and all this time I have been watching porn

 

[GregCentauro]

I<3 CNN

I'm praying daily for a full-blown war in the Middle East so that I can constantly see CNN's Israel correspondent Paula Hancocks on TV. :iloveyou:

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

There's still a CNN on the air, whoa and all this time I have been watching porn

They were the only ones who were broadcasting (live) people jumping to their horrible death on 9-11. I was watching Fox that morning when my buds called and informed me CNN was showing that shit. (I know, sick, right?) I just wanted to know what was truly going on.

But again, I was watching Fox and apparently they had the "good taste" to stay away from those images. Either way, I watch both networks for my morning (hungover) "news". :o

 

[Hot Mega]

They were the only ones who were broadcasting (live) people jumping to their horrible death on 9-11. I was watching Fox that morning when my buds called and informed me CNN was showing that shit. (I know, sick, right?) I just wanted to know what was truly going on.

But again, I was watching Fox and apparently they had the "good taste" to stay away from those images. Either way, I watch both networks for my morning (hungover) "news". :o

:dunno:Wanna continue being a zombified, sleepwalker ...knock yerself out...:glugglug:

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

There is a reason CNN was referred to as the Clinton News Network back in the 90's. They are the typical, left biased news channel.

Fox is biased toward the right, and CNN, MSNBC, and many others are all biased toward the lefties.

When you watch them all you can do is take it all for what it's worth, knowing they are biased.

 

[Hot Mega]

There is a reason CNN was referred to as the Clinton News Network back in the 90's. They are the typical, left biased news channel.

Fox is biased toward the right, and CNN, MSNBC, and many others are all biased toward the lefties.

When you watch them all you can do is take it all for what it's worth, knowing they are biased.

The only goobers who referred to CNN as that were GOPers who were programmed to expect CNN to pick up and run with every rightwonk conspiracy peddled against Clinton...If Rush said it..of course it must be true and why isn't CNN reporting it.

Likening Fox to the simple opposite of CNN is pretty absurd. CNN is simply run of the mill, milquetoast news reporting.

If they were the lefty organization you and other delusional GOPers claim they were they would have done to Bush the same thing Fox does to Obama.

Run with ever goofy conspiracy and claim in order to besmirch Bush.

GOPers are either too stupid, intellectually dishonest or both to accept reporting not slanted for their view doesn't automatically mean it's slanted for the opposing view.

CNN reports on GOPers no different than it reports on Demos you cannot find one CNN hatchet job on a conservative anywhere near some of the "reporting" on Obama and his so called terrorist ties Faux did.

Like I said, to try and lump CNN in as the other end of the spectrum reporting to Fox is absurd.

MSNBC's main hosts on their opinion shows are mostly progressives...but they do something Fox doesn't. Allow opposing view hosts to headline their own shows.

I understand why Fox wouldn't because first it's not in their political interests to have a host spin facts away from their agenda unopposed and their viewership is overwhelmingly mindless dribblers who don't think for themselves and the show wouldn't be successful.

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

The only goobers who referred to CNN as that were GOPers who were programmed to expect CNN to pick up and run with every rightwonk conspiracy peddled against Clinton...If Rush said it..of course it must be true and why isn't CNN reporting it.

Likening Fox to the simple opposite of CNN is pretty absurd. CNN is simply run of the mill, milquetoast news reporting.

If they were the lefty organization you and other delusional GOPers claim they were they would have done to Bush the same thing Fox does to Obama.

Run with ever goofy conspiracy and claim in order to besmirch Bush.

GOPers are either too stupid, intellectually dishonest or both to accept reporting not slanted for their view doesn't automatically mean it's slanted for the opposing view.

CNN reports on GOPers no different than it reports on Demos you cannot find one CNN hatchet job on a conservative anywhere near some of the "reporting" on Obama and his so called terrorist ties Faux did.

Like I said, to try and lump CNN in as the other end of the spectrum reporting as Fox is absurd.

MSNBC's main hosts on their opinion shows are mostly progressives...but they have something Fox doesn't. Conservative hosts headlining their own shows.

I understand why Fox wouldn't because first it's not in their political interests to have a host spin facts away from their agenda unopposed and their viewership is overwhelmingly mindless dribblers who don't think for themselves and the show wouldn't be successful.

Mega, you are entitled to your opinion, but you're quite simply wrong. You see Fox as this ultra right wing channel because they are so different from what you think. I see the others the same way. You are not going to convince anyone of what you're trying to say here.

 

[Hot Mega]

Mega, you are entitled to your opinion, but you're quite simply wrong. You see Fox as this ultra right wing channel because they are so different from what you think. I see the others the same way. You are not going to convince anyone of what you're trying to say here.

Convincing you or others inclined to believe like you is irrelevant to my thinking as the facts are the facts.

When you can find me clips of CNN hatcheting GWB or other Cons....the way Fox routinely does to Demos..you will have yourself a point.

In most cases they care about the reporting than the politics...case in point had their care about the politics more than the reporting they would have torn Breitbart's hoaxes apart before airing them.

Speaking of which...has Fox done what any other reputable news agency would have when it played party to a hoax..issue a retraction??? No! Because they care more about Breitbart and his politiko operatives than the facts.

 

[1ManRevolution]

American cable news is NOT "news". They don't care about reporting the story. All they care about are ratings. If you want a real understand of what is going on in America. CHeck out BBC or a foregin news agency. America's suck.

 

[Trident1]

CNN doen't even have a decent line up of anchors anymore. I mean Rick Sanchez? Or "Mr. I'm Related to the Vanderbilts" Anderson Cooper.......gimme a break.

 

[CunningStunts]

American cable news is NOT "news". They don't care about reporting the story. All they care about are ratings. If you want a real understand of what is going on in America. CHeck out BBC or a foregin news agency. America's suck.

Mostly agree, though the BBC sometimes engages in left wing slant with the best of them.

The problem with modern mainstream media is simple: No one really wants to find out the TRUTH. In an age of rabid political activism, PC, corporate owned news outlets, and the ever-present shadow government, the news has become either a ratings ploy/reality show, or a propaganda bullhorn. Very few journalists care about finding the truth because they are first of all mostly morons, and to succeed at one of the big news outlets, they have to please their masters, who give a shit about the truth. :2 cents:

 

[Crazy4theBrat]

I could also bring up the liberals on network news. One name should suffice for an example: Dan Rather.

 

[CunningStunts]

:dunno:Wanna continue being a zombified, sleepwalker ...knock yerself out...:glugglug:

A recent poll shows your nation's capital, Washington, DC, gives President Barrack Hussein Obama an 87% approval rating. I don't care what your personal views are, but there are your zombies... in DC... with no original ideas or objective thoughts... running your government, and with increasing zeal and power, your lives.

 

[Trident1]

A recent poll shows your nation's capital, Washington, DC, gives President Barrack Hussein Obama an 87% approval rating. I don't care what your personal views are, but there are your zombies... in DC... with no original ideas or objective thoughts... running your government, and with increasing zeal and power, your lives.

Take two steps outside the beltway and the approval rating for the Ungifted One drops to something like 25%.:1orglaugh

 

[CunningStunts]

Take two steps outside the beltway and the approval rating for the Ungifted One drops to something like 25%.:1orglaugh

Exactly my point. The drivel most people in this town spout is truly frightening... it's a land of irrational zombies, completely insulated from the real world.

 

[Trident1]

Exactly my point. The drivel most people in this town spout is truly frightening... it's a land of irrational zombies, completely insulated from the real world.

Oh but we're called sheeple by his Majesty's supporters since we have a different opinion.

 

[Hot Mega]

A recent poll shows your nation's capital, Washington, DC, gives President Barrack Hussein Obama an 87% approval rating. I don't care what your personal views are, but there are your zombies... in DC... with no original ideas or objective thoughts... running your government, and with increasing zeal and power, your lives.

Geez...talk about zombie..

I know this is going to require novel thinking on your part but wouldn't that be evidence of the reverse??

That some aren't quick to knee-jerk and attribute things to his administration which preceded it and know that as bad as it was and getting worse before, that it takes time as it has in other similar cases??

He's basically done the things his campaigned on...the platform which got him elected...so who are the zombies?? The wheat grass electorate who are whimsically looking at all the bad news and attaching it (fairly or unfairly) to a president or those who approve of the job he's doing which is basically the same he told them he would be doing upon election??

 

[1ManRevolution]

Geez...talk about zombie..

I know this is going to require novel thinking on your part but wouldn't that be evidence of the reverse??

That some aren't quick to knee-jerk and attribute things to his administration which preceded it and know that as bad as it was and getting worse before, that it takes time as it has in other similar cases??

He's basically done the things his campaigned on...the platform which got him elected...so who are the zombies?? The wheat grass electorate who are whimsically looking at all the bad news and attaching it (fairly or unfairly) to a president or those who approve of the job he's doing which is basically the same he told them he would be doing upon election??

On foregin policy he is eqaul to Bush...domesticlly though, he is much better.