close-ups

[coffe85]

I still cannot understand why the pornclips are ~ 50% close-ups of the genitals. I like to see a pair, and especially a pretty girl in action, but the close-ups of sex parts are hard to distinguish from one clip to another.
Are there some experts who can say which vag belongs to which performer? are the genitals so erotic? For me they are always nearly the same.
So why to fill the clips with them
please comment

 

[YMIHERE]

It's for training of the aspiring gynecologist porn fans.

 

[Legzman]

dunno, but I like the closeups

 

[gunslingingbird]

I'm not a fan of closeups. I'd rather see the whole woman than just her labia.

 

[calpoon]

you mean there's more to a woman than just her labia?

I don't know, i guess people want to see "the goods".

 

[tartanterrier]

Possibly so that people don't put a page of a magazine,monitor or tv screen right up
to their face for a closer look.Which stops people from damaging their eyes

 

[senob44]

I tend to not like too many closeups. If you've got a typical free gallery of 15, I would prefer one semi-closeup and one full closeup. I think that's all you need. I **** when you've got a full set of a chick posing and it's like 200 pics and the last 20 are full-screen closeups of the pussy. Seems like a waste. Then again, I find a lot of the pics in large full sets to be quite redundant.

 

[gunslingingbird]

I tend to not like too many closeups. If you've got a typical free gallery of 15, I would prefer one semi-closeup and one full closeup. I think that's all you need. I **** when you've got a full set of a chick posing and it's like 200 pics and the last 20 are full-screen closeups of the pussy. Seems like a waste. Then again, I find a lot of the pics in large full sets to be quite redundant.

You're not implying that 5 pics in a row in every large full set are the same thing, only with the girl's mouth opening or closing, or her eyes looking left and right are you?

 

[senob44]

You're not implying that 5 pics in a row in every large full set are the same thing, only with the girl's mouth opening or closing, or her eyes looking left and right are you?

LOL exactly. In one of the contests on here, I won a week's membership to Brazzers. So I just downloaded all the picture sets I wanted. I swear, for a good 3 weeks on and off, I was paring down the sets determining what pics were just redundant, what I would keep, what I wouldn't. Some of their sets have 600+ pics. If it wasn't the fact that it was porn, it would have been positively grueling mulling over the pics. I had the hard drive space, I just couldn't see keeping all the redundant pics.

 

[gunslingingbird]

LOL exactly. In one of the contests on here, I won a week's membership to Brazzers. So I just downloaded all the picture sets I wanted. I swear, for a good 3 weeks on and off, I was paring down the sets determining what pics were just redundant, what I would keep, what I wouldn't. Some of their sets have 600+ pics. If it wasn't the fact that it was porn, it would have been positively grueling mulling over the pics. I had the hard drive space, I just couldn't see keeping all the redundant pics.

I remember that contest! It's the only time I've won anything on Freeones!

Yeah, I know what you mean about the redundant pictures. Some of those sets could probably have natural fluid movement if you clicked through the pictures fast enough. Kind of like when you look at consecutive frames in a film reel.

 

[D-rock]

It's an easy simple formula that the people that make porn can go by. If they didn't they would have to get slightly more creative and actually use their brains a little. They might have to think about angels and combining film together in a more pleasing manner, which is just too hard for them when they can just put a bunch of junk together in almost any way and get people to buy it anyhow.

 

[TL13]

Personally its down to a personal preference between close up and the wide shot...the 50 50 thing is down to pleasing both preferences...or at least that's how i would justify it.

In my little work i do prefer to see the wide shot rather than the close up. You can actually see the women enjoying it...or at least making it look she is.

 

[Torre82]

I enjoy the midline.

On the first hand it's nice to see her face to see if actual pleasure is recieved, yes.

Then again without seeing the rest.. in extreme detail hopefully, it's just ****** IMO. You have to see the source of the pleasure.

I find my imagination slowly returning to me inbetween metal gear solid 4 and being cable-free for years upon years. (mgs4.. best movie I've ever played. Who needs imagination when a lil japanese guy is telling/showing you exactly what he meant all those other times.. I mean games.) My imagination likes knowing not only what her body looks like.. but closeups of everything give a 'texture' to it all, dont you think?

One of my favorite sets would be of the lovely miss Nella. 90% closeups. Face normal, smiling, laughing.

Full body, close up of tits. From the front, from the side, of the nipple.

and it just shows everything. Eventually her toes and armpits. It was all the areas I wish I knew on most hotties. Not because any of those are necessarily *amazing*, no. Simply makes her a real person.

Overexplaining a bit. Honestly, tho.. while you're having actual sex what do you really get to see most of the time? Face, tits and puss. Unless you're doing a solo tantric thing to your porn at home, most porn is pretty shallow with good reason.

 

[BlueBalls]

It's for training of the aspiring gynecologist porn fans.

Exactly, taught me all I know.

 

[Legzman]

Torre's explanation makes perfect sense to me!