Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

[bobjustbob]

Provide evidence that this has been discredited.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/
http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/chemtrails/
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/is-there-any-high-quality-evidence-of-chemtrails.736/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread279057/pg1

Okay, there. All of those sites prove definitively that chemtrails don't exist. That's my evidence. I have now proved the actual factual reality of the matter.

I see that your well thought out post was instantly disregarded without actually refuting it properly and that EVERYTHING he writes is indisputable. Kinda reminds you of some other headstrong fool, doesn't it, Dirl? You know exactly who I am referring to.

 

[eric2136]

People disregard evidence that I post all the time, no matter how thorough it is. I have heard every argument possible, pro and con, regarding this issue, and I have yet to have anyone provide evidence that can refute the reality of the situation, which I knew was undoubtedly true, before I ever even decided to create this thread.

 

[Red XXX]

Eric it is all true - you've just got the wrong government, I have posted evidence that you can not refute of the reality of the situation ....... it's the N.W.O boyo!

 

[eric2136]

Eric it is all true - you've just got the wrong government, I have posted evidence that you can not refute of the reality of the situation ....... it's the N.W.O boyo!

More humor ! not bad for an amateur, Red ! I'd say you are on about the Mr.Bean level with your comedy routine, but you've got a long way to go to catch Benny, that guy was a legend !!

:clap: Ms Red Bean XXX, The Queen of Pornstar Amateur Comedy :clap:LOL

 

[Red XXX]

The funny thing is .... I'm not the comedian in this thread

 

[lurkingdirk]

Eric, to try to give you an understanding how talking to you is like banging one's head against the wall, please follow this demonstration:

Eric: X is totally true.
others: please show proof
Eric: X is totally true
others: please show proof
Eric: X is totally true, here are a collection of spurious sources that you absolutely can't deny
others: some of what you said contradicts things you said earlier
Eric: X is totally true, everything I've said is true, you can't prove otherwise
others: here is some proof to the contrary
Eric: X is totally true, your sources are completely false, only things I post are true, you can't deny it.
others: could you clear up the contradictions in what you said earlier?
Eric: X is totally true, I've already answered everything that you could possibly need to know, now you just have to believe me or you're stupid.
others: you didn't answer the questions.
Erix: X is totally true.
Begin at the beginning again.

You're not trying to discuss, you're trying to proselytize. Any information offered to the contrary, you will dismiss immediately. You're not interested in discussing anything except what you in your heart believe is true. It's fine to have strongly felt beliefs on any given subject, but you're acting like a foolish child in this thread. Enjoy your chemtrails. I've had it with the likes of you.

 

[xfire]

http://contrailscience.com/chemtrail-myths/
http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/chemtrails/
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/is-there-any-high-quality-evidence-of-chemtrails.736/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread279057/pg1

Okay, there. All of those sites prove definitively that chemtrails don't exist. That's my evidence. I have now proved the actual factual reality of the matter.

I only looked at the first site you linked to and didn't really need to read the others because it slams the door on everything eric has posted about "chemtrails".

Chemtrail Myths
contrails
May 182007

Some people believe that the government is spraying something into the air, and this creates unsual looking contrails. They call these “chemtrails”. Now, there is no real evidence that “chemtrails” are real, but there are several myths on the internet about “chemtrails”. All these myths can very easily be shown to be false, and I’ve gathered the most popular myths here as a little time-saver for the person who has encountered “chemtrails” for the first time.

Myth #1 – Normal contrails don’t last very long, but “chemtrails” last for hours and sometimes spread out.

False – Contrails fade away, or persist, or even spread out to cover the sky, depending on the weather conditions. you can confirm this by looking in an encyclopedia. such as the Encyclopædia Britannica

[Contrails] may last for several hours. The trail may be distorted by the winds, and sometimes it spreads outwards to form a layer of cirrus cloud.

For more info on this myth, read “Persisting and Spreading contrails”

Myth #2 - Contrails have been observed to persist and spread when the humidity was too low, so they must be “chemtrails”

False – Nobody has ever measured low humidity within a persisting contrail. The fact is it is very difficult to measure humidity in a specific region at a specific altitude, at a given time, the best you can do is make a rough prediction. Measurements are made by weather balloons at just a few stations that average 235 miles apart, at 12 hour intervals, and then local predictions are extrapolated from this. The weather balloons can drift as much as 100 miles in their ascent, so you never know where the measurements are coming from. Humidity can vary by as much as 80% in a 12 hour period, and vary by similar amount over just a few miles. The fact that the contrail is spreading is actually a far more accurate indicator of high humidity than the available humidity predictions. NASAs own experiments (right) show persisting contrails over a large range of calculated humidities, even down to 10%.

Myth #3 – Long lasting contrails have appeared in “parallel lines”, “grid” and “X” formations, which are not normal, so must be “chemtrails.

False. Well, the last bit is false. Yes, contrails make all kinds of patterns in the sky, simply because there are a lot of planes flying overhead, and they fly in all directions. This is pretty much a function of where you live, and the prevailing winds. For example, if you live the Willamette Valley, Oregon, the overflying planes are nearly all North/South, so you’ll get parallel lines. If you live live in more central place, like North Texas, you’ll get planes flying overhead in every direction, so you will get “X” patterns (and “H” and “grids”). If there’s enough wind, and the trails last long enough, then the grid might spread out to cover the sky.

Myth #4 – A bill to ban chemtrails was introduced into congress by Dennis Kucinich, but quickly had chemtrails edited out.

False – HR 2977 was written by a bunch of UFO enthusiasts intent on exposing a conspiracy to suppress alien technology. Dennis Kucinich did not write the bill, he not know what chemtrails were, and when he found out, he distanced himself from that language. The bill was re-written in order that it might pass. See the full article: Kucinich, Chemtrails and HR 2977.

Myth #5 – Public Law 105-85 gives the military permission to experiment with chemical and biological weapons on humans, without their consent

False – 105-85, Sec. 1078, actually prevents experiments except for peaceful purposes, and those can only be performed if informed consent is obtained from each test subject. It’s basically the same procedure as for human drug trials.

SUMMARY

Those myths are really the basis of the “chemtrail” conspiracy theory. There is more, of course, like the halos and sun-dogs that you sometimes see (normal atmospheric optical effects), the dark lines (shadows of varying types), the stuff on the ground (unconnected). But these things really get to the heart of 99% of the chemtrail argument. After they are dispensed with, the theory holds about as much water as alien mind-control implants.

 

[lurkingdirk]

I only looked at the first site you linked to and didn't really need to read the others because it slams the door on everything eric has posted about "chemtrails".

Yes, but because he didn't post it as a source, clearly that site has no credibility, so Eric doesn't need to speak to it, because he has proven the definitive thing by randomly using bold and using strong language.

 

[Chopper3000]

Eric shot himself in the foot the very moment he mentioned those two legendary and immortal words in one of his posts - 'David Icke'. I'm still laughing now.

 

[eric2136]

Red XXX[/URL][/B], post: 8177265, member: 55251"]The funny thing is .... I'm not the comedian in this thread

Don't sell yourself short Red Bean…you are much funnier than you give you think... LOL

 

[eric2136]

As for the rest of the peanut gallery still quoting ridiculous "debunk" sites, I refer you to my earlier comments :

"...As i have already stated several times, "debunk" sites have no credibility because they don't conduct their own research, nor do they have the weight of scientific and political evidence and testimony behind them. You can revisit posts #242, #255, #260, #262, #267, and #272 in starting to realize this fact.

And also realize that I have provided the best evidence by far, substantiating the thesis of this thread, and, as such, each and every statement made by me, in anyway relating to this topic, is 100% accurate, and my evidence is 100% rock solid and, as such, constitutes the absolute truth and reality of the situation.

Try again…"

 

[bobjustbob]

each and every statement made by me, in anyway relating to this topic, is 100% accurate, and my evidence is 100% rock solid and, as such, constitutes the absolute truth and reality of the situation.

Try again…"

How about that airplane you said could be rented? You provided no evidence?

 

[JaanaRuutu]

I want to rent an airplane.

 

[Anonyne#017]

eric when is the deadline for you to return this little chemtrails essay back to your school teacher? Also don't forget to give credits to freeone's members propely when you are finished...
:yahoo:

 

[Chopper3000]

Put on the straight jacket and off to the padded cell for Eric. Wibble wibble.

 

[lurkingdirk]

As for the rest of the peanut gallery still quoting ridiculous "debunk" sites, I refer you to my earlier comments :

"...As i have already stated several times, "debunk" sites have no credibility because they don't conduct their own research, nor do they have the weight of scientific and political evidence and testimony behind them. You can revisit posts #242, #255, #260, #262, #267, and #272 in starting to realize this fact.

And also realize that I have provided the best evidence by far, substantiating the thesis of this thread, and, as such, each and every statement made by me, in anyway relating to this topic, is 100% accurate, and my evidence is 100% rock solid and, as such, constitutes the absolute truth and reality of the situation.

Try again…"

Nah, I provided a site that had credible research. Doesn't matter who did it, it conclusively proved you wrong.

That's all I need to know. You're wrong.

 

[eric2136]

None of you morons have provided any sources anywhere near approaching in credibility what I have provided. Nor have you introduced any credible original independent scientific evidence, whatsoever, regarding anything. If you even think of asserting otherwise, you are either a liar, or a complete idiot. LOL I'm putting my money on the latter. LOL

"...As i have already stated several times, "debunk" sites have no credibility because they don't conduct their own research, nor do they have the weight of scientific and political evidence and testimony behind them. You can revisit posts #242, #255, #260, #262, #267, and #272 in starting to realize this fact.

And also realize that I have provided the best evidence by far, substantiating the thesis of this thread, and, as such, each and every statement made by me, in anyway relating to this topic, is 100% accurate, and my evidence is 100% rock solid and, as such, constitutes the absolute truth and reality of the situation.

Try again…"

 

[lurkingdirk]

Nope. You're still wrong. We provided adequate doubt. Your sites are no more credible than the ones that we provided.

I can use bold, too. Trouble is, I'm correct, and you're just blathering.

 

[bobjustbob]

I'm still waiting for your 100% rock solid evidence that $22,000 per day rental plane wasn't made up by you.