Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

[eric2136]

Yeeeah just what I thought, more dumb pics... You boys are definitely through…you're out of ammo, and your tanks are on empty…Time for me to go smoke my blizzo and let these girls sizzzo on my dizzzo. I'll let you pornboard pansies keep finger-poppin' each others assholes, and I'll check back on you trolls sometime tomorrow…

Hopefully, by then, you can scrape together some form of intelligent response that doesn't look like it was written by a remedial crack-head middelschooler…lol

Or just bow down and acknowledge domination by your intellectual superior (which you should have done in the first place)…I don't give a fuck, but either way I'll be back later tomorrow to see what you lames have left to contribute to the game lololol

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

 

[CptHa]

I just want my questions answered. All you did was dismiss them and call me names, that not intellectual superiority.

 

[Red XXX]

LOL Is this a little better Red Bean? Besides I'm not concerned with what color you decide to dye your hair from week to week.

I'm much more interested in that pretty smile and that rockin'bod :rofl:!

Oh ... bless. did it take you all day to find those Crayons :woot:

 

[Red XXX]

I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon. Your dumb little pic just further makes you look like the idiot class-clown who will never finish high school !

'Environmental Scientists' Eric ... I don't want to tip you over the edge - but I have a BSc (Hons) degree thingy in Geology which is classed as an Environmental science! I can't help it but so far you have not yet produced a single scientifically peer reviewed article that could seriously support this rubbish!

And by the way ... you can't even tell a Redhead when you see one :hairpull::hairpull::hairpull:

 

[Red XXX]

Yeeeah just what I thought, more dumb pics... You boys are definitely through…you're out of ammo, and your tanks are on empty…Time for me to go smoke my blizzo and let these girls sizzzo on my dizzzo. I'll let you pornboard pansies keep finger-poppin' each others assholes, and I'll check back on you trolls sometime tomorrow…

Hopefully, by then, you can scrape together some form of intelligent response that doesn't look like it was written by a remedial crack-head middelschooler…lol

Or just bow down and acknowledge domination by your intellectual superior (which you should have done in the first place)…I don't give a fuck, but either way I'll be back later tomorrow to see what you lames have left to contribute to the game lololol

It's just bull ...

 

[JaanaRuutu]

FUYS THERE WERE THESE GIANT WHITE THINGS IN THE SKY LAST WEEK AND THEN A BUNCH OF WHITE STUFF FELL DOWN BUT YESTERDAY IT TURBED INTO WATER AND NOW IT'S GOING AWAY?????????? WHAT IS THIS?????

Is the government poisoning me with magical sky powder?!

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Is the government poisoning me with magical sky powder?!

 

[Philbert]

Eric...there was a window there where you could have had some credibility granted by your tying up some loose ends, but you decided to "poop sculpt" some BS responses to direct and relevant questions, becoming an object of amusement to all.
Weird choice there.
Anyway...Dexter could show you in his lab the reality that there currently exists no metallic based lifeform on this planet...your home on Tralfalmadore probably has lots, but you're shit outa luck here.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

You must spread some reputation around before giving it to Philbert again.

 

[eric2136]

I just want my questions answered. All you did was dismiss them and call me names, that not intellectual superiority.

I responded in detail to you and gave you specific instructions as to how to proceed, if you are too dumb too follow those instructions, then that's your problem. Either do what I asked, or get lost. Your initial question was not up to a standard where I would bother to address you in detail.

 

[eric2136]

Ok I know you are a little slow on the uptake, so I'll explain it yet again. I have presented the overwhelming amount of corroborating testimonies, from persons with superior professional and political proximity to the geoengineering phenomenon to make statements of paramount credible significance. I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon.

Further, I have substantiated irrefutable evidence of aerosol chemtrail spraying of both bacterial and chemical agents being done in military covert operations around the world since at least the 1950's.


You have nothing to offer compared to that. As a matter of fact you have offered nothing whatsoever. I know you are somewhat simple, but even you should understand that I clearly have the overwhelming weight of the best evidence .

I really don't care what you have a undergrad degree in. That crap BSc is worthless and you make no money with it. We both know how you get your scrilla mah nilla. You have no credibility here. So if you have a point to make then get in line with the rest of the idiots and submit your opinion with complete evidentiary support, so you can continue to get owned like the rest of the buffoons.

'Environmental Scientists' Eric ... I don't want to tip you over the edge - but I have a BSc (Hons) degree thingy in Geology which is classed as an Environmental science! I can't help it but so far you have not yet produced a single scientifically peer reviewed article that could seriously support this rubbish!

And by the way ... you can't even tell a Redhead when you see one :hairpull::hairpull::hairpull:

 

[eric2136]

Yeeeah just what I thought, more dumb pics... You boys are definitely through…you're out of ammo, and your tanks are on empty…Time for me to go smoke my blizzo and let these girls sizzzo on my dizzzo. I'll let you pornboard pansies keep finger-poppin' each others assholes, and I'll check back on you trolls sometime tomorrow…

Hopefully, by then, you can scrape together some form of intelligent response that doesn't look like it was written by a remedial crack-head middelschooler…lol

Or just bow down and acknowledge domination by your intellectual superior (which you should have done in the first place)…I don't give a fuck, but either way I'll be back later tomorrow to see what you lames have left to contribute to the game lololol

LOL Again, just what I thought...Nothing but more web pics and bullshit…this is all you lazy simpleton bums have produced for me….i swear you lying little clowns are about as worthless as a 4 dollar bill lololol…where my lil Tatto Boy at, guess I crushed him so bad that he went running off like a little bitch with his tail between his legs..da plane da plane ! lol..

Somebody, anybody pull you head out of your asses and contribute something that doesn't bore me to death with it's stupidity LOL

 

[Philbert]

FUYS THERE WERE THESE GIANT WHITE THINGS IN THE SKY LAST WEEK AND THEN A BUNCH OF WHITE STUFF FELL DOWN BUT YESTERDAY IT TURBED INTO WATER AND NOW IT'S GOING AWAY?????????? WHAT IS THIS?????

Is the government poisoning me with magical sky powder?!

I must say, Eric has inspired some of the funniest responses I've seen in a while to his hysterical treatise on lab-created alien lifeforms.
Jaana...I share your terror...same phenomenon occurred here! People were running around all freaked and strapping things to their feet to traverse the white stuff...it's madness!

Abe B. has created a series of TV worthy scenarios of Chemtrail Evidence of existence...I am quite amused, as is the Queen I'm sure.

Not so, RedXXX? Did she comment when you went by for afternoon tea?

And as I'm sure Eric will not answer anyone's reasonable questions or refute anyone's direct disavowing of the simple-minded Chemtrail theory, this thread can continue to amuse any who drop in for some time...til the absolute boredom of Eric hiding behind his faux-derision get's a bit underwhelming and posters begin leaving in droves.

Thank you one and all!:jester::glugglug:

 

[Red XXX]

Philbert ... shall we snuggle up with a good book together!

 

[Philbert]

Absolutely! I'll gas up the car and be there asap!
Do you have off-street parking?

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

 

[bobjustbob]

Well, Bob, first and foremost, the case study fails to include individuals in the study who actually have physical evidence, either within their skin, or filaments which they have extracted, of their infection.

This fact alone makes the study borderline fraudulent because anyone who has studied this issue knows that the medical profession refuses to examine the lesions on patients containing filaments, nor will they extract the suspect filaments, or analyze the filaments that patients have extracted themselves..

Both of your statements show that you have no idea what you are talking about. Point by point I provide evidence of that your statements have no merit.


"the case study fails to include individuals in the study who actually have physical evidence, either within their skin, or filaments which they have extracted, of their infection."

Biopsies were done at the clinic and patient supplied samples were examined. See below from http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158

"A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria for this study: 80 received biopsies, 80 had self-procured skin specimens, and 52 patients received biopsies and provided specimens."

So there you go. You made the claim and I provided evidence with link to prove your statement wrong. Let's do it again.


"the medical profession refuses to examine the lesions on patients containing filaments"

Another one of your claims that is outright false. See the evidence below from this study. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029908

Here you see the patients lesions that were examined.

What was found in these samples supplied by biopsy or patient samples? See the tables below provided by this report link: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158


These are the biopsy results. Click the links to see the charted evidence.

http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/data/journals/derm/22498/m_dst15014t1.png

These are the patient supplied findings.

http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/data/journals/derm/22498/m_dst15014t2.png



I hope this satisfies your format criteria.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

 

[eric2136]

What is this bullshit!?!?!...I'm not clicking on any of your links Tattoo Boy. If you are claiming that filaments have been extracted and examined then state specifically what your sources medical findings are as to the composition and origin of said filaments. Provide this informations in quotes, and then provide citations so that I can examine your evidence. Is that too fucking difficult, that's the one thing that I told you to do and you still haven't done it. Get with the program Tattoo and stop wasting my time !

Both of your statements show that you have no idea what you are talking about. Point by point I provide evidence of that your statements have no merit.


"the case study fails to include individuals in the study who actually have physical evidence, either within their skin, or filaments which they have extracted, of their infection."

Biopsies were done at the clinic and patient supplied samples were examined. See below from http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158

"A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria for this study: 80 received biopsies, 80 had self-procured skin specimens, and 52 patients received biopsies and provided specimens."

So there you go. You made the claim and I provided evidence with link to prove your statement wrong. Let's do it again.


"the medical profession refuses to examine the lesions on patients containing filaments"

Another one of your claims that is outright false. See the evidence below from this study. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029908

Here you see the patients lesions that were examined.

What was found in these samples supplied by biopsy or patient samples? See the tables below provided by this report link: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158


These are the biopsy results. Click the links to see the charted evidence.

http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/data/journals/derm/22498/m_dst15014t1.png

These are the patient supplied findings.

http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/data/journals/derm/22498/m_dst15014t2.png



I hope this satisfies your format criteria.