Bush says some NATO allies let U.S. down in Afghanistan

[D-rock]

So lets see. Besides the US forces there was a very small token amount of other troops on our side from other nations, that we practically had to bribe or at least nag to be there for a lot of them, that had little to do with the planning of the conflict, that didn't have control of things in a strategic sense, that really didn't have much to gain from it, and somehow it's their fault and not ours and the person that was leading our armed forces, that things didn't go that well for us because we didn't have enough troops or a good strategy to carry it out.

Nice try Bush. :1orglaugh

 

[Mauser98k]

why won't somebody indict this idiot for war crimes? put all the shit in Iraq solely on his head and make him pay for it.

 

[Hot Mega]

Nice try Bush. :1orglaugh

I wouldn't even give him cred. for a 'Nice try..'. This psycho-babble amounts to little more than flap-trapping just to keep from being quiet. It's laughable honestly and more than anything it just demonstrates what we all know...these :yahoo:'s will say ANYTHING.

 

[vodkazvictim]

............said the leftist who'd never served anything but burgers and fries.:1orglaugh

That's a good point; it's better to fight, kill innocents and make a mess of the economy in the name of a shullbit cause than to contribute positively (even in a small manner) to the economy.

why won't somebody indict this idiot for war crimes? put all the shit in Iraq solely on his head and make him pay for it.

Because life is neither fair nor just.

 

[Trident1]

That's a good point; it's better to fight, kill innocents and make a mess of the economy in the name of a shullbit cause than to contribute positively (even in a small manner) to the economy.

So you're saying our people who serve in the military are out to murder innocents?

 

[Hot Mega]

So you're saying our people who serve in the military are out to murder innocents?

I think he's making the easily discernible case that it's the effect of the policy. How many innocent Iraqis (for example) have been victimized by our policy?

You wouldn't blame the 'gun' if a person sprayed onto a crowd killing 15 people trying to get 1 would you?

The weapon (our military) is just doing what it can to follow your command (policy).

 

[vodkazvictim]

So you're saying our people who serve in the military are out to murder innocents?

No, I'm saying that innocent deaths in the form of collateral damage are inevitable in todays modern urban warfare, that they are a bad thing and are even worse when there is no just cause for them.

But I'm also saying that on some occasions some us troops set out to kil linnocents.

 

[Trident1]

No, I'm saying that innocent deaths in the form of collateral damage are inevitable in todays modern urban warfare, that they are a bad thing and are even worse when there is no just cause for them.

But I'm also saying that on some occasions some us troops set out to kil linnocents.

Thank you. That makes more sense than Mega's chicken scratch.:hatsoff:

 

[Hot Mega]

Thank you. That makes more sense than Mega's chicken scratch.:hatsoff:

Wetnurse ...it equals the same thing....collateral dam. Or did you learn what an analogy is in your studies?