BioDefenseGrad
Banned
Some of these photos are photoshopped.
Best hips/Waist
- Thread starter denvrseven
- Start date
This girl is awesome !!
her name is Emily Jean, I just created a thread about this hottie :
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?725206-Emily-Jean-30G-model
Platinum Dior
http://www.modelmayhem.com/2124179
33D - 23 - 38
fake ass & boobs but a WHR of ... 0.60
http://www.modelmayhem.com/2124179
33D - 23 - 38
fake ass & boobs but a WHR of ... 0.60
The Hourglass ... and the Powerglass
Like many, I prefer the latter, the hourglass. And like yourself, I prefer wide hourglasses of 100-75-100cm (around 40-30-40") dimensions on 1.6-1.65m (5'3"-5'5") that are wide hips and wide chest, often with an enlarged bust and matching, but opposing, jutting rear.
Karina Hart (Boobpedia) is one poster woman of such, with a very, very small midsection/inflection point, especially when viewed from the side, compared to her other proportions. I call this specific figure+proportion the "Powerglass."
Understand I go one step further than the Wikipedia article and categorized select, rarer forms of hourglass women into four types: "Superglass", "Powerglass", "Ultraglass" and "Uberglass"
- http://board.freeones.com/entry.php?7623-The-Types-of-Women-That-Drive-Us-Insane (backup copy at Tumblr)
I also add a fifth type for stocky, top-heavy, apples which I call the "Shotglass." Again, many of these are rare women, far from the norm, for hourglass and apple shaped women, especially the wider implements.
- http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?68420-Full-fucking-hips-(and-tummy)
She was more of a "Superglass" in her early-to-mid 20s, very modelish dimensions. But eeven in her early 20s I predicted she would "bloom" into an unreal figure by her 30s. She very much has, even beyond my wildest dreams. She is an even sexier version of a "Powerglass" than Karina, and her width flirts with what I call an "Ultraglass," while still not being a BBW (with an oversized belly).
The biggest issue with Michelle is that her breasts overhang so much now, even more so than when she was younger and thinner, so one cannot see her tiny midsection/inflection point for her proportions, both then, and definitely more so now. She has to hold up her breasts to show how extreme her hourglass really is, although her sides now "pinch" more because she is wider and more "packed."
I know some guys define that as "fat." But in reality, the truest test of "fat" v. "womanly curves" is the stomach, how much it overhangs, or not. Most doctors agree that it's better than BMI, because some women do actually have a figure that cannot fit into an US size 8 or 10 without borderline anorexia. Most women widen with time, and lose their teenage and early 20s narrow forms, and quite often because of child birth, even if they go slender again -- still 5cm or more added in overall dimension.
I use Michelle as an example in my Tumblr article on this.
- http://profvolup.tumblr.com/post/39608156315/a-lot-of-people-talk-about-thin-busty-women
It's one thing to love women with "big tits." There are a lot of fantasies to be had. But to find a "Powerglass" or other woman with a serious set of curves toe-to-top is another matter entirely. At least for myself, it unleashes a deep, animalistic lust that is part eye-candy, part procreation-driven lust, and instils an extremely deep desire for not just intercourse, but intercourse completely meshed and intertwined with her body.
There is also this total level of bullshit out there that "wide" women are "built for comfort, not for speed." A lot of guys have fired off pre-maturely and knocked up a lot of women they thought were "fat" or otherwise not going to be "fast" once they got atop of them. There's a huge difference between a woman with a belly sticking out forward, and a woman with curves spread out wide and into a completely feminine presentation. I use the phrase "powerful thighs and cum siphoning hips," because hourglasses, especially wide Powerglasses, are nature's own turkey baster implement.
And there's a reason why the ensuring, even if often misused (at least today), term "voluptuous" means the overall potential for successful intercourse and procreation, and not just her mammary glands alone. Darwinism at its finest.
In this thread I full expect a contrast of women from pear/spoon shape to hourglass. When I stumbled upon the Wikipedia article "Female body shape", it was bare and quite useless. I massively reorganized it and added the first, factual (with citations) references, including the well publicized NC State study which broke down the four, major body types.
Like many, I prefer the latter, the hourglass. And like yourself, I prefer wide hourglasses of 100-75-100cm (around 40-30-40") dimensions on 1.6-1.65m (5'3"-5'5") that are wide hips and wide chest, often with an enlarged bust and matching, but opposing, jutting rear.
Karina Hart (Boobpedia) is one poster woman of such, with a very, very small midsection/inflection point, especially when viewed from the side, compared to her other proportions. I call this specific figure+proportion the "Powerglass."
Understand I go one step further than the Wikipedia article and categorized select, rarer forms of hourglass women into four types: "Superglass", "Powerglass", "Ultraglass" and "Uberglass"
- http://board.freeones.com/entry.php?7623-The-Types-of-Women-That-Drive-Us-Insane (backup copy at Tumblr)
I also add a fifth type for stocky, top-heavy, apples which I call the "Shotglass." Again, many of these are rare women, far from the norm, for hourglass and apple shaped women, especially the wider implements.
I'd nom(nomnom)inate this girl, if I knew her name...
Michelle Bond (Boobpedia) is extremely unique, I started a thread built heavily around her, back in her mid-20s when she was still thinner.
- http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?68420-Full-fucking-hips-(and-tummy)
She was more of a "Superglass" in her early-to-mid 20s, very modelish dimensions. But eeven in her early 20s I predicted she would "bloom" into an unreal figure by her 30s. She very much has, even beyond my wildest dreams. She is an even sexier version of a "Powerglass" than Karina, and her width flirts with what I call an "Ultraglass," while still not being a BBW (with an oversized belly).
The biggest issue with Michelle is that her breasts overhang so much now, even more so than when she was younger and thinner, so one cannot see her tiny midsection/inflection point for her proportions, both then, and definitely more so now. She has to hold up her breasts to show how extreme her hourglass really is, although her sides now "pinch" more because she is wider and more "packed."
I know some guys define that as "fat." But in reality, the truest test of "fat" v. "womanly curves" is the stomach, how much it overhangs, or not. Most doctors agree that it's better than BMI, because some women do actually have a figure that cannot fit into an US size 8 or 10 without borderline anorexia. Most women widen with time, and lose their teenage and early 20s narrow forms, and quite often because of child birth, even if they go slender again -- still 5cm or more added in overall dimension.
I use Michelle as an example in my Tumblr article on this.
- http://profvolup.tumblr.com/post/39608156315/a-lot-of-people-talk-about-thin-busty-women
It's one thing to love women with "big tits." There are a lot of fantasies to be had. But to find a "Powerglass" or other woman with a serious set of curves toe-to-top is another matter entirely. At least for myself, it unleashes a deep, animalistic lust that is part eye-candy, part procreation-driven lust, and instils an extremely deep desire for not just intercourse, but intercourse completely meshed and intertwined with her body.
There is also this total level of bullshit out there that "wide" women are "built for comfort, not for speed." A lot of guys have fired off pre-maturely and knocked up a lot of women they thought were "fat" or otherwise not going to be "fast" once they got atop of them. There's a huge difference between a woman with a belly sticking out forward, and a woman with curves spread out wide and into a completely feminine presentation. I use the phrase "powerful thighs and cum siphoning hips," because hourglasses, especially wide Powerglasses, are nature's own turkey baster implement.
And there's a reason why the ensuring, even if often misused (at least today), term "voluptuous" means the overall potential for successful intercourse and procreation, and not just her mammary glands alone. Darwinism at its finest.
Carmella Bing = Superbly lustttyyyy
Last edited: