Looks like the Cocker Spaniel got put out in the rain.
Wasserman Schultz resigning as party leader
That's an insult to Cocker Spaniels. :nono:
I find it ironically amusing that a Jewish woman would lead an effort to rig the nominating process in favor of a gentile White woman, while her organization devised a plan to use the Jewish heritage and faith (or lack thereof) of Bernie Sanders against him in the deep south. Who was going to assist them with this effort, David Duke? Me thinks that she would have made a good Kapo back in the day.
And it was Madeleine Albright and Gloria Steinem (both Jewish) who made statements a few months ago that it was the
duty of women to support Hillary, simply because she's a woman. Albright went on to say that there was a special place in hell for women who don't support other women (specifically Hillary). [NOBABE]Lena Dunham[/NOBABE] (also Jewish) has made similar statements or implications. She's even said that any and all criticism of Hillary is based on misogyny (a favorite word for the PC
Social Justice Warrior types).
All this to say that I am confused by the rules and bylaws of 21st Century political correctness. I did my best to keep up with political correctness in the 80's and early 90's. I didn't agree with it (at all), but I thought that I understood their rules back then. But now, there's just too many "if/then" statements. It's more confusing than 4th Year Econometrics: "if the gentile candidate is a woman, then you must support her over the Semite candidate, if he is a male". One has to wonder what Jill Stein thinks of this anti-Semitic, feminist foolishness.
Not a single thing about these warped, hypocritical people is what Dr. King spoke of, when he said that people should be judged (and supported) based on the content of their character, instead of the color of their skin (as well as their religion, gender, etc.).
Welcome to
1984, friends, neighbors and countrymen (er, country
persons).