Here's a crazy idea, but there is this site, Premium Link Upgrade , I know, its a small one and you may not have heard of it, but it actually has a ranking for each girl that is based on searches, links, clicks, and rating of their content, wouldn't that be a pretty good metric to go off?
Here you go, Jenna Jamesons ranking since she was first entered on the FreeOnes site Premium Link Upgrade
Now, keep in mind that there will be two spikes in the graph due to database hiccup, this is being investigated but does not affect any of the relevant long-time stats.
Also, as an indicator how very small our sample size is, did you know that at any given second of any given day there will be between 9000 and 15000 visitors on freeones, all dedicated to their favourite girls, so no interference from irrelevant information, now I know that the lack of interference may skew your results, but unfortunately thats all we have.
I'm sure most fans would agree that Jenna Haze deserves a much better ranking than 99 on the list of all-time most popular porn stars.
I'm sure most fans would agree that Jenna Haze deserves a much better ranking than 99 on the list of all-time most popular porn stars.
Actually, no, they wouldn't. What you don't seem to understand is that freeones has been doing for years what you've spent probably more time fantasizing about doing, and that's compiling real-time stats from a huge sample population. If anything could make you realize how futile and pointless your threads are, what FreeOnes_Anders just shared with you should, if not, nothing will. It's highly amusing watching you try to debate the merits of your threads with the actual real numbers FreeOnes has accumulated over the years, it doesn't get any more real than what you just got enlightened with.
I don't know what you are looking for here. Rank the 4? We'll do that. Ask us why? You will get our opinions. Are you looking to justify your personal choices as better than ours? Then you don't need our individual opinions. Or even a poll or survey of 20, 200, or 2000. Anders showed you how you can look up popularity daily through 10 years of searches. Let me do some homework for you. Jenna Haze has consistently ranked in the 20s and 30s. Sasha Grey had some spikes into the 20s and teens but mostly 30's and 40s. Tori black took 2 years to inch into the top 100 but since 2009 has been top 10 or 20 consistently. A few times in top 5 but not nearly as long or as often than Jenna Jameson. Jenna is 40 and Tori 25. At the same age in their careers Tori couldn't hold Jenna's **** bucket.
So there you go. You've got the numbers. Does it support your opinion? No. Do you feel the need to justify your opinion with numbers? Why? To believe that you are the ultimate judge of porn talent? Make this project for your own head. To judge others opinions to be inferior to yours won't happen. We don't care. We don't want to live in your world. Don't look to us to justify your self worthiness.
I will be polite to you, xfire, and simply say that you could not be more incorrect - and I can prove it to you quite easily.
For example, if today (June 3, 2014) you were to enter Madison Ivy into the link provided by FreeOnes_Anders, you would find her positioned #1 in terms of overall rank. No one in the world, not even Madison Ivy's biggest fan, would say that she's the most popular pornstar of all time. Although the Freeones link is a nice feature, it is clearly limited in its scope.
Numbers don't lie, nor do they have an opinion. What you're attempting to engage in is the definition of pseudoscience, there's no way you could ever get the access to the type of database that FreeOnes owns, the sheer volume would overwhelm you so you're reduced to starting statistically insignificant polls for the sake of trumpeting your opinion in an attempt to make yourself feel important. It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. And honestly, I don't care what you do, but don't pretend like you're some great compiler of important information, you're not, and there would be more people appreciate it if you stopped than if you continued.
2. Of course you have an agenda, you want to feel important, same motivation as your "HOF" threads, it's pretty transparent.
So much unnecessary animosity...but why? - I seriously believe a sizeable percentage of people here are in need of therapy.
It's just a poll for god's sake - the purpose being only to gauge the opinion of Freeones members as to which pornstar they like more. I have no agenda whatsoever, other than satisfying my curiosity and being informed.
So you created this poll to gauge which of the 4 porn star legends is the most popular? Is that the point here? And you felt that the 15 or so people (on a good day) who would vote in your poll would give you a better answer than the years of empirical evidence gathered by the FreeOnes database? If that doesn't scream self-importance, I don't know what does.
You're working with an incredibly small sample size. Your poll doesn't mean ****. It's not an accurate representation of anything. It's a waste of time. The results are meaningless.
No, no, no, no, no. It could have been simply a poll but you wanted to turn it up. Legends, statistics, validity of statistics, sampling skews, demographics. You brought all of this stuff up. If it looks like an agenda, walks like an agenda, quacks like an agenda then guess what? Just look at your defense of XROC Hall of Fame. Academy of Nude Photographic Arts. RMP-Int’l Nude Photo of the Year Tournament. We are not getting it because we are not buying into the self importance it emotes.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I will continue to initiate polls that I find interesting. Whether one person chooses to participate or 100, it doesn't matter... either way it's no skin off my back. Those who do decide to participate - thank you very much, I really appreciate it. Those who choose to get all bent out of shape over nothing, spewing venom unnecessarily, enjoy yourselves, I will not be apart of it.