Another new trend in Porn? "Drone-Boning"

[Supafly]

Of course, new trends and new tech always finds it way into porn. And for guys into voyeur porn, this is a logical step, so there you are

What do you call the first porn film shot using a drone? DRONE BONING

A team of filmmakers has created a surprisingly tasteful pornographic movie shot using a drone.

Drone Boning - produced by a company called Ghost+Cow - features stunning aerial views of beautiful outdoor scenery, spiced up by naked people, er, boning.

The artsy camera work and the ‘Where’s Wally’ effort it takes to actually see the copulating couples (and occasional trios) means it's not particularly graphic.

...

Source
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/what-you-call-first-porn-4573401

 

[BusterLoads]

The name is rather stupid. As a voyeur myself, the concept sounds interesting and sounds like it should be good in theory but I have two issues. I'm much more auditory stimulated than visually stimulated. I could listen to porn without video but I could never watch porn without audio. If the camera is going to constantly be in motion on a drone so high up and I can't hear them, then it's a fail. Also, as with pretty much all porn that's setup to appeal to voyeurs, it doesn't really work if the actors are staged. Then it just becomes professional porn, and all professionally shot "voyeur" porn is a fail in general. But still, I'll wait until I see some full scenes before I give my final verdict. I'm all for companies trying new things so hopefully this will be something new that takes off.

 

[Aaliyah Love]

it's probably a "normally shot" scene, with audio and all of that, with drone footage cut in here and there? Like when I do a bathtub scene and edit in underwater GrPro footage.. it couldn't ALL be drone footage? Wouldn't it also be too shaky?

 

[Supafly]

it's probably a "normally shot" scene, with audio and all of that, with drone footage cut in here and there? Like when I do a bathtub scene and edit in underwater GrPro footage.. it couldn't ALL be drone footage? Wouldn't it also be too shaky?

I think the footage COULD be very usable if the drones used were real military-grade models. I believe they have fantastic flight stabilities and software that cancels out the vivrations and wind draft etc

 

[D-rock]

The image stabilization would have to be fantastic for shooting with drones to work. Even in high budget mainstream stuff I see only certain shots being valid for drones for some time to come. A few seconds of vistas or broad landscapes if fine for them, but up close stuff can be done better with conventional cameras.

Also, as with pretty much all porn that's setup to appeal to voyeurs, it doesn't really work if the actors are staged. Then it just becomes professional porn, and all professionally shot "voyeur" porn is a fail in general.

Ummm...so just how the hell do you think it could work any other way? Of course porn is staged. It's also not like most sane people care if they watch this or any other type of movie and very well know the action isn't really happening.

 

[BusterLoads]

Because your such a doofus, I won't even begin to get into why your post was dumb. Hopefully someone else here will explain to you what voyeuristic porn is all about, and then MAYBE you'll understand why I made my post. I don't have much hope for you though. You seem to be so obsessed with trying to make me look bad, you wind up embarrassing yourself. Give it a rest man. Seriously.

 

[Aaliyah Love]

I think the footage COULD be very usable if the drones used were real military-grade models. I believe they have fantastic flight stabilities and software that cancels out the vivrations and wind draft etc

the audio would still be shot, tho. Either way, I would love to see if for myself. I don't know anybody in LA using drones in porn.. yet

 

[Johan]

Future porn : drones filming sex dolls fucked by fucking machines...

 

[fkknuckle]

I think I have to poop.

 

[thatbigsecret]

Not very interesting from what I've seen...Close-up is better.

 

[RASQ]

Not very interesting from what I've seen...Close-up is better.

^This.

 

[Supafly]

I think a definition of 'close up' is called for. Is it like a foot away, balls dingling in the camera? Or Prtrait range, soo, like two to five feet away?

I can't stand these close-ups, at least if they are more than just second-long glimpses

 

[Aaliyah Love]

Now if the scene started out with a Hollywood blockbuster-type shot (the kind that used to be done w helicopters) of coming over the mountains, the clouds in the blue sky, the amazing scenery, then slowly drops into a sex scene already happening, and it's an artsy, voyeur, surprising type of shot.. then it goes into the camera on the tripod (or handheld, whatever) and the scene begins.. well, then that might be kinda cool, and add production value. I could see Digital Desire, babes, maybe Wicked.. websites like that using it

 

[cornytone]

Let see how far they fly the fuckin drone until I can't tell dick from vagina.