I don't want to be negative, and really prefer to give kudos, but I'm amazed by how many things are wrong with the new website that have jumped out at me in just a few minutes of trying to use it.
1) I can't search for girls with natural breasts, only fake boobs (same goes for only selecting for tattoos and piercings, not excluding them). Are you kidding me? IS THIS WEBSITE AN APRIL FOOL'S JOKE??
2) You didn't bother to import the fake/natural info from your old database, so all the natural pornstars have profiles that say their boobs are "unknown".
3) The profile layout is a mess, making it unintuitive to quickly find any info --- what was wrong with a list of attributes on the left and their values on the right?
4) The search engine's age field (along with "date of death") is truly bizarre. I can only choose from preset demographics, or I have to use fifty mouseclicks to specify a range of DOB's. How about just letting me type in the "minimum age" and "maximum age"? Was that too simple?
5) There's no units for height/weight/everything. Sure, I'll figure them out, but it comes across as half-assed.
6) In "My Collection > Babes", I can sort them by "relevance", and that's it. Is "alphabetical" too much to ask?
7) There's some animated chick that keeps trying to get in the way of me using the search fields.
8) The "List view" is an afterthought. Their profile photo doesn't use the full height of the row unless I hover over it -- why, is it just to annoy me? To add insult to injury, the right two-thirds of the row is empty.
9) The forums on my desktop browser look like they're from a mobile browser or phone app.
Seriously though... the most frequent thing I used to do on this website (every visit) was to quickly go to "Advanced search", pick "The good news is that we are going to fix most of the things you mention in the next few months. some will already been done this week. And a few others in the coming weeks. Thanks for your input.", "pornstar", "natural breasts", and then sort the results by rank and look for any rising stars. And I can't do that now. Needless to say, that lowers my opinion of this redesign immensely -- it's a non-starter.
If you want to add a "cool search engine feature" though, one thing I'd like is to search by "cup volume", in CC's. So, for example, a 38B, 36C, 34D, and 32E all have the same cup volumes of 590cc, according to the table in this link:
https://www.laurengreenbergmd.com/breast/what-is-the-volume-in-cc-of-a-cup-size/
So the idea would be you could search for a particular (range of) size of tits without having to mess around with bra band/cup sizes.
